Ban Basketball

If you follow the strict guidelines, you'll find this a harder exercise than you think. I still have only selected one, but second guess it all of the time. My son asked me last weekend, as he does many other music fans , that if there was a Mount Rushmore of musicians, which four musicians should be on it? Criteria to consider (which is what makes it so tough): Individuals, no bands. Your consideration must include everything: talent, impact on music, impact on the world, etc. Can (and should) include any style of music. He dropped it on a bunch of us at a family gathering last weekend. No one came up with all four at once, but here were some smattering of names mentioned at the gathering. Beethoven, Prince (what?!), Joni Mitchell (what?!), Bob Dylan, Ozzy Osbourne, Michael Jackson, Shania Twain (what?!), John Lennon, and Paul McCartney. My one and only pick, influenced by my other son, is Bob Dylan, but I question it every day.

Why has no one mentioned differences in size, or are we to assume that they are all the same size?

I personally thought that McKee looked sickly in this year's Big Dance. Other than Tomasello when he went back to 125, that may have been the most sunken in eyes I've seen.

Perhaps a legendary choker in the big match, but that's about it.

This was from the old mat.com that didn't make the transfer over. Ben Bennett

I've just finished a great book within the same area(s) that I tend to focus my reading on. In this book, the author repeatedly says that much of the M.O. of "truth" from the authoritarians today are one of two things: (1) it's "true enough" and (2) it's "plausible," therefore "true. Then, keep repeating any of the two combinations above, over and over for 12 hours on AM radio, and for 24 hours on Tattletale News, and, as the Nazis knew, it will become "true" because it's continually repeated. This case is a classic example; it's plausible.

In this case, a triplet of the Brands brothers. I've picked Tom as the pic, as the bass player looks more like Tom to me.

Coup! Witch hunt! Election interference! Fishing expedition! Weaponized DOJ! Free speech violation! Anything else stupid that I've missed?

Yet another that, in my mind, seems like this is his tenth season.

I love percolated (is that a word?) coffee myself. Don't have it very often these days, but an argument can be made that they still make the best cup of coffee out there.

I saw it on stage. It was killer.

Thanks, my friend. I'm not the man I was once-age has caught up with me-so I don't have the stamina for too much back and forth these days.

Plain old Mr. Coffee coffee maker, but I am a bit of a coffee snob so I buy good quality coffee.

I use "pernt" to say "point." Also, being from Minnesota originally-where pert near came into being-it's pert near, not pernt near.

If identifying as a communist qualifies in one's mind...GUILTY!

Wowza! Anti-woke has gotten itself to this pernt now? Well, actually, here's guessing you found this little touching moment hilarious as well.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-deposed-ny-ag-civil-probe-business-practices-rcna42355

"Sidewinder data?" What did you find incorrect about it? If so, take it up with the people that us professionals who trust it report to us every year.

As I asked when initially accused of doing it ON HERE, whom on this site have I called a name?

In this thread I called someone who posts on here a name?! Which one? As a word of note: KK Nuttinbutayahoo doesn't post here.

What names did I call anyone on this site?

Unfortunately and ironically, the data that you haven't looked at will tell you the exact opposite tale. Something that AM radio and Tattletale "News" doesn't tell you is that there are Jews in Israel who are critical of the Israeli gubment, including Nuttinbutayahoo. They certainly aren't anti-Semites, are they, sir?

Who is the group who reports to us these annual reports? If they are indeed part of this "central planning" scheme that you speak to, then that group is indeed the group trying to "centrally plan" for us all. As I said, ironically, it's folks like you that they are largely having to report to us. Enjoy being associated with hate groups? If not, then why do you oppose their reports?

No, you said that Jews are part of this supposed "central planning" scheme. Ironically, it's folks like you that they are detailing, among others, in their annual reports.