Ban Basketball

Did the little green men in your salt shaker tell you that? WOWZA!

One thing to consider. Yes, I jokingly have been saying this, but, as it turned out, it ended up kind of being true. I've wondered since seeing my first solar panel on a rook how they eventually replace shingles. My joking way of saying it was that years later the people involved in both industries (roofers and solar panel companies) will suddenly realize, "oops, one BIG thing we all kind of overlooked: how do you replace shingles?!" I never could find out online, but, as I suspected, I spoke to a guy who installs solar panels and his quick and easy answer for me was, "you can't replace them, once the panels are in." Apparently, that's why most who install them have a metal roof installed then install the panels. HOWEVER, another problem that I always brought up with those, to which no one disagrees: metal fades, so those metal rooks, many years down the road, are going to look ugly, like old steel and aluminum siding eventually does.

Yes, all of the courts agree with you.

Now I'm regretting letting go of my Bradley, but I have yet to use the smoking tube in the Traeger, so I'll see.

Still not convinced, eh?

There's no way that Deuce will be able to stay away from Twitter (or whatever he uses) to completely self-destruct.

What few years I've been doing it, I cook nothing without a thermometer. Too easy to under or over cook stuff, which then made me feel that I wasted hours of work.

Thanks for the helpful reply. As I said, I'm only using my Traeger for long smokes, but I have bought one of those smoking tubes. Haven't used it yet, but I'm told that they work well.

Defund the FBI (police)!

As HUD McVeigh Hannity says, you can't make this stuff up.

This could have been talked about earlier, so sorry for the repeat. For those who have Traeger's, do you find that they smoke meat enough? I've only done two long smokes with it, but mine is getting better as it seasons, but it's a far cry from my old Bradley smoker.

In the rare instances where it happens, that can be the case. Often times, studies are done with little fanfare or utility.

Sorry to disappoint! Not one of my "strong suits."

Long way to go before he gets to the level of the Schwab brothers.

This is spot on correct.

It'll be later in the evening, but I'll be in no shape to read, much less write.

I'll be around for a bit yet, but in the afternoon and evening I won't be able to check in, so I'll hope to read a report in the interim. Thanks!

So, it wasn't true that Deuce appointed more minority group members to his "team" than any President/"president" prior to him? If not, then someone on AM radio, Tattletale "News," and Deuce himself were lying to us.

If that was illegal, it would have been called out and deemed as such. It wasn't to fill a mythical "quota," was it?

A lot? I've been involved with science in varying capacities for about thirty years now. By a lot, can you document something for me, preferably by percentages, that I may not be aware of? If so, I could find it very useful in my work. Thanks in advance!

Yeah, but world leaders saw it as a clown show, just as someone claimed with Australians. Tit for tat, as we used to say in Minnesota.

Actually, you trust research for the very reasons contained in the article. If the peer review process doesn't catch it, something or someone else will. Just happened to Stanford's President as well.

Good looking cut of meat, and that's coming from an Iowan.

And this moment of dignity on the world stage. I wonder what made Deuce change his tune and fall in love with Kim?