uncle bernard

hit translate on the hebrew tweet if you want to see confirmation of what i’ve been saying this whole time. hamas is the pretext. this is really about the land and israeli settlement.

Rugby star Ilona Maher is dealing with a lot of the same harassment. It's shameful.

Because I'm not a retiree who spends his entire day on the internet. I work for a living. start caring about the ones who are actually born and then we'll talk.

I didn't see the Hezbollah bombing and it's a crime against humanity. Lucky for me, I've been 100% consistent on this. I don't just condemn barbaric acts when they're done by states I don't like. *and Israel* I'm glad you're finally taking an interest in murdered children. These 12 murders are a tragedy. Let me know when you're ready to talk about the 15,000+ Israel's killed. It should be noted that this happened in the Golan Heights, annexed illegally by Israel, where most of the population is not Israeli and do not recognize the area as part of Israel. They consider themselves part of Syria. This kind of tragedy is exactly why we need a ceasefire. Millions of innocent people are caught in the middle between barbarians.

"She is further left than Bernie Sanders and that is saying something." That is ludicrous lmaoooo. I wish though.

I think your answer is "No, they should not be punished" because that's what you wrote.

Buddy, you literally said it. That's how English works. To quote you: "IF....and that is a big IF...any of these reports are true AND [my emphasis] this goes against Israel's protocol for interrogating prisoners..." That's what you wrote. Words have meaning. But maybe you just don't understand English, so I'll give you a straightforward chance to clarify: If these soldiers were ordered to rape the prisoners by their superiors, should they still be punished?

So, if they *are* supposed to be doing them (gang-rape in this case), then they shouldn't be held accountable? This was, and I mean 100% literally, the Nazi defense at Nuremberg. "I was just following orders."

You literally said that. "IF...any of these reports are true and this goes against Israel's protocol for interrogating prisoners"

the perfect metaphor

this reporting has nothing to do with hamas. but it’s exactly this kind of thing that empowers hamas and brings people to its cause. this is the result of 75 years of telling their own citizens that palestinians aren’t human. israel’s civil society is in a very dangerous place right now. and much the same can be said for the other side, the way palestinians have been trained to hate Israelis. that’s why we need a different approach long term if this is going to get any better.

do you even know what you’re mad at anymore?

pretty impressive for the left to rig the election when they were out of power and republicans oversaw the elections in 2/3 key states. maybe they just wanted it more? don’t the republicans have a personal responsibility to try harder?

I'm sorry, rape and torture would be okay as long as it doesn't go against Israel's protocols?

Republicans have no answer for “These guys are weird.” It’s malpractice the Dems took this long to do this. Thank you Tim Walz. Doesn’t help when AP is running fact checks on whether your VP pick “***ducked** a couch” lol

Looking forward to the usual crew who condemn Hamas as barbaric, condemning this barbarism too…I won’t hold my breath. @Bigbrog is not allowing Israeli soldiers to rape and torture prisoners anti-semitism?

If Harris picks Walz, she will win.

This is the country you blindly defend. Soldiers in mutiny because they think they should be allowed to rape and torture prisoners.

Dems are running with it to prove their “threat to democracy” line but the reality is even funnier imo. He means he doesn’t care if they come out to vote after this election as long as they vote for him this time. It’s not about an agenda or the party. It’s just about him winning. That’s all he cares about. It’s always just been a game to him.

race continues to shift

No, he was committed to debating Biden September 10th on ABC. Now, he has withdrawn his commitment to that debate. September 10th on ABC.

Semantics and cope. He went from agreeing to debate Harris to "well, I'll decide after the DNC." There was a second debate scheduled and he is not committing to that debate.

Why'd he pull out of the debate?