Wrestleknownothing

My money is on Wade. 2010 285 consolation bracket

Missed them because for part of the time they were D1. Of course, from 1975 to 1987 they scored tons. That 1980 score would have been good enough for 8th. But the lower 1982 score would have placed 6th. And the lower still score from 1981 would have placed 5th.

It certainly used to be weird. But someone normalized it. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-rules-trump-illegally-deployed-national-guard-l-rcna224779

Clarion was in the non-D1 category for just a single tournament (1973). Sadly, that would also have been their only trophy. Had their points counted they would have finished fourth. Their next best finish came in 1987 (6th). The most successful non-D1 team was easily Montclair State. Montclair State and Pitt-Johnstown are the only non-D1 teams to crack 20 points three times. Of course, Pitt-Johnstown's team was a team of one each time. Nebraska Omaha led the way with 9 appearances in the 19 years this was a thing. I am still QA-ing the scoring data, so everything could be wrong. But hopefully not. But maybe.

Mea culpa. A laudable effort too.

That was a lot of words to say no you won't stop whining.

I promise to answer the question if you promise to stop whining if I do. Agreed?

I think you should stop whining about it.

To find a whinier first lady you have to go way, way, way back to the present. Remember her complaining about being questioned about refugee children when she was working her ass off on Christmas decorations? Or when she wore the "I don't care" coat while visiting a refugee camp? She sounds as whiny as you.

You very proudly stated you started this thread. That would make you the constant whiner. Self awareness, among a lot of other things, is not your strong point.

So if you are angry about an 18% tax rate you must be incensed by someone who claims to have 20x the net worth but had a 0% tax rate.

So what tax laws do you think the Obamas have broken?

Or in @Caveira's case, avoid the topic.

So Obama is smarter than you. No surprise there. What tax laws do you think the Obama's have violated?

You don't pay taxes on net worth.

I think saying nothing is better than saying something that is nothing.

Presumably this wrestler you can't remember was guilty of something. What if Starocci is not guilty of something (besides being a tool) what should Sanderson say then? Should he say anything? Or should he not lend credence to it? You speak as though you know Starocci to be guilty of these things and Sanderson owes you something as a result.

Certainly the school has had a huge scandal, one of the biggest, most awful ever. But wrestlers getting nailed for PEDs, drinking, and prostitution, does not rise to the level of scandal. Unseemly, sure, but not scandalous. The things alleged by the Bartlett's are criminal. It seems that crimes should be reported to the police and investigated by the police. And at least one was. The police found no evidence to support the claim. Maybe it happened anyway. Some thieves get away with it. And some accused of crimes, never commit any. Let's face it. Starocci is unlikeable. Bartlett is very likeable. Sometimes opinions flow from that.

If I had remembered who it was I would have. Thanks for sharing.

People keep trying to prove with the negative. The lack of evidence is suddenly evidence of something. Someone on here claimed they knew ESPN was looking into it. Maybe dig that guy up and ask.

How would I know? Sounds like a question for the reporters. Ask them and get back to us with their answers.

What question has a reporter posed to him? As near as I can tell, none.