Wrestleknownothing

Do you think a person who has a history of doing exactly what he is accused of doing, and just fired three people he accused of leaking information about what he has done, is more likely, or less likely to have done it more than once?

They do not name the sources but say it is "according to four people with knowledge of the chat. Also from the article: "Unlike the chat in which The Atlantic was mistakenly included, the newly revealed one was created by Mr. Hegseth. It included his wife and about a dozen other people from his personal and professional inner circle in January, before his confirmation as defense secretary, and was named “Defense | Team Huddle,” the people familiar with the chat said. He used his private phone, rather than his government one, to access the Signal chat. The continued inclusion following Mr. Hegseth’s confirmation of his wife, brother and personal lawyer, none of whom had any apparent reason to be briefed on operational details of a military operation as it was getting underway, is sure to raise further questions about his adherence to security protocols."

After updating the scoring model I decided to looking into why the shifts that occurred had occurred. I was really focused on the seeds in the twenties and thirties as there was some expected smoothing out in that area. And sure enough, the #22, #23, #25, and #29 seeds all had their best ever performance. Though the #27, #31, and #32 had their worst performance ever. But what really jumped out was the #4, #5, and #6 seeds had their worst performance in the 16+ seed era. And it wasn't even close for the #5 seed. This year the 5 seed produced only 3 All-Americans. That is tied for the lowest total ever in the 8 AA era (1979 - 2025). In 1980, when there were also only 3 AA's from the #5 seed they finished second, fourth, and eighth. This year they finished fifth, fifth, and eighth. No #5 seed beat his seed. This year the #12 seed had more AA's (5) than the #5 seed (3). That had never happened before.

DEI hire Pete Hegseth needs to go. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/20/us/politics/hegseth-yemen-attack-second-signal-chat.html

When Trump read his Chinese Bible he thought Pontious Pilate was the hero of that story. Just kidding. Trump has never read a Bible.

Not 100% sure if it is all, but it is a lot more than what UWW lists. That total is from his wikipedia page.

Sometimes it does

Meh

To ne clear (because the OP is rarely clear), if it is a scholarship then it is not taxable. If a third party pays, it may be taxable to some extent.

If so, so is every freestyle wrestler ever.

Freestyle wrestlers do not wrestle often. In 12 year Sadulaev has 163 matches and has gone 10 months to 1 year between competitions 4 times.

You do NOT have permission to use my picture.

And is that Tom Brands saying "Whoa" as Mike Caliendo jogs past?

Drew Henson seems to be doing OK

And a new one this year. Taking a barbell approach, the most interesting results are often the extremes. So, here I have the probability of being in the final two versus the probability of going 0-2, BBQ.

Next comes the probability of All-American by seed.

I spent a little time yesterday folding the 2025 results into the model. First, expected points, including bonus, per seed. Not a lot of big changes, but the hump in the 26/27 range has begun to flatten out a bit. The other interesting thing is, despite the change in scoring there was not a noticeable change in bonus. While it is higher than the previous two years, those years were very down. I am looking at 11 years of data (the 16 and 32 seed era), and across that range 2024/25 bonus scoring does not stand out.

Yeah, those stats range between hard, and impossible, to come by.

Hell, I am not knowledgeable enough to start the topic, but here we are.

692 views and only 36 votes. Call me confused.

If by alleged you mean admitted, then sure.

Ok, the story says alledged. Many people have been accused of many things that turned out to be false. That the Trump Administration is now attempting to win in the court of public opinion when they canmot win in multiple courts of law means nothing to me. But it sure does to some people.

What article? Do you mean the screenshot of a headline from the ny post?

Oh, yes it can. It does it all the time through its control of the world financial system. That theater in the White House was orchestrated by Trump. The funniest punchline was when a guy who calls himself a charismatic dictator said he had no power to return him. And he did it with a straight face.