Wrestleknownothing

You are very morbid.

And Musk's lawyer hilariously calls it Twitter.

This reminds me of my favorite line from How I Met Your Mother. Robin is a news anchor and her lead in to commercial was, "Is your baby trying to kill you? The answer may surprise you."

Free speech absolutism strikes again: https://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-lawsuit-cchd-twitter-x-hate-speech-extremism-434a80631f9e76833ee30387c04dd290

I know you kid, but that will absolutely be the new argument people use instead of admitting they are wrong.

We have seen. Yes.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CvS0jL8vAgN/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

For me its The Salt Lick in Driftwood, TX near Austin

And all is right with the world.

That seems off topic. But I can't be sure anymore.

You have conveniently left out so many key details. The u visa was created as part of the attempt to prosecute human trafficers who have brought people hear against their will. You only qualify for a u visa if you help law enforcement prosecute a specific set of crimes, like if you were kidnapped and brought to the US against your will. The new law does not allow illegal immigrants to become cops. It allows non-citizens who are legally authorized to work in the US to apply to become cops.

If they have a visa they are not illegal.

Nope. That is not the source he copy pasted from.

What source are you copy pasting irresponsibly from?

I swam competitively at a decent level though I never took a lesson and cannot float, fellow rock.

Does swimming count? I will show myself out.

God, I love ice cream.

I like it better without that. The trailing wrestler has a bigger incentive to score that way. If he doesn't score he gets -30 points for his team, but if he does score he gets 31 points for his team for a 61 point swing. With your way of awarding points to the losing wrestler it goes from -22 to +22, still a big swing, but I like the bigger swing.

The soccer player in question.

There can be a marked increase in the incidence of something, but still be a low risk. For example, in the study from the armed forces on myocarditis they found the risk to be low (23 cases from 2.8 million doses), but elevated relative to expectations for military receiving a second dose (19 from 0.5 million vs expectation of 0 to 10). From the study: "The observed number of male military members who experienced myocarditis after their second dose of mRNA vaccine, while relatively small, is substantially higher than the expected number."

I love option 2

That was DJT's first proposal above.

I think this is the study you are referring to (if not, let me know): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2781601 It shows the expected rate of male military incidence as 0 to 8, with the observed rate at 19, fitting your 250%. The rate among female military members was zero, which would be lower than expected.

I see this as a very cynical bill. They know it has absolutely no chance of going anywhere, but they can tout that they tried.