I like the direction this is going.
When I first read that there was a time when the ref decided the winner I thought, "wait, is this ice dancing? Or wrestling?"
Now I am getting more curious about the history of the RD amd SRD. In the Kemp situation was the reasoning that Kemp had plenty more time to win more, so lets give it to the other guy? What caused the rule change away from RDs? Was there a precipitating event or was it a long period of discontent and discussion?
Who can answer my questions?
The conclusion you have jumped to is incorrect on two fronts. No red line when typing on my phone. And no red line when the wrong word is spelled correctly. Perhaps your boogie man, Sanderson, is to blame for that too.
Following the examples of others. The PSU fans did not set the presedence, but when all you have is a PSU hammer you only see PSU nails. Round out your arguments. Try playing a second note.
Interesting that we can hear the same thing differently. Having never wrestled and literally knowing nothing about it, I very much appreciate the coaching. For me it is not over.
It was less about the inside scoop and more about an encyclopedic knowledge of positions, what to do with them, and how to explain them. For example, in the D2/D3 match he was "coaching" the wrestlers through the positions (i.e. telling us what they needed to do to score). And when they failed to do what he was advising he did not turn critical. He also explained these things well and clearly while letting CP run the show.