Wrestleknownothing

Dean "Guaran Damn Teed" Hamiti v Izzak Olejnik Hamiti attacking. gets on the right leg, but can't keep it. Hamiti back on the right leg, has it shelved on the edge, but can't keep it in bounds. DT pointing out Olejnik is good with the whizzer, but it isn't a position you want to be good at because it means guys are on your leg all the time. Olejnik with a stall warning. And the period ends 0-0.

Hertel reverses Novak in TB-2. Novak goes neutral looking for the TD. But still can't find the O.

Van Ness wins 5-1. The only TD was off a really good scramble. Novak v Hertel struggled to find their offense. 1-1 in regulation. in SV-2 now.

Time to reinvigorate this thread. Found this at Costco. A very smooth sipper. Little, to no burn. I think it was under $50. Drinking it while I watch the All Star Classic.

we can hope

sorry, not sure

> DT < CP

Carol Stream's Tony Ramos sighting.

Wkn loves all the people.

injury, I believe

maybe they could arrange a trade for a Big Boarder to be named later?

With the right discount rate and the right growth estimate we are all billionaires.

And for the ladies:

Putting this on the last page so we do not have to scroll through to look for the changes:

For completeness here are the outcomes in the consolation bracket: A very different set of results on the pinfall line in consolations than in the champinoship bracket. In the championship bracket as the pyramid narrows the number of pinfalls drops. I know. Hard to believe. In the consolation bracket it is fairly constant until you get to the blood round and placement matches. Things tighten up when all-american is on the line and when final places are determined. More wide open otherwise. I think there is something to that. It isn't just about parity on the back side, I think there is also room in the conversation for the change in pinfalls being due to risk taking.

Reading this it seems a little less thermonuclear and a little more tempest in a tea pot. Some might describe this lawsuit as an attempt to stifle free speech. What are the odds?

I would love to see that too. It seems to me that the matches end early more often with the speed some of these techs. You trap an arm or drop to a tight lace and the match can end in seconds.

I had no idea Musk was a Democrat.

@ionel, and everyone else getting me Weller 12 for Christmas, is good by me.

That sounded suspiciously like someone volunteering to add the superior decision era to my data set.

Yes, Taylor was a pinfalling and TFing machine. Only 6 of his 20 matches ended with a DEC or MD.

That is sharp.

Let's get this out of the way first. I am not looking to break the bank here. So, maybe a Weller 12 year. Winning three coin flips with a fair coin comes in at a 12.5% probability (0.5^3). But Lockhart's flawless coin technique has already been discussed, so let's bump that up to 12.6%. Now let's talk about the probability of 5 consecutive 1 point wins. Using the 1988 - 2021 results we want to focus on the product of the DEC 1 line. Based on this history there is a 0.02% probability (11.34% x 15.34% x 19.85% x 26.67% x 23.64%) of five straight 1 point decisions. Combined with the enhanced coin flip probability we are now at 0.0027% probability of five straight 1 point wins with 3 successful coin flips. I will toast you every time I tipple.

1988 - 2021 data. I have talked about this. Now if you are looking to extend the data before 1988 or after 2021, I am listening.