VakAttack

Finally something good happening for those guys.

This would be hilarious.

Let me seriously apologize on this one, I misread what Diaz wrote. It is very much an expansion, which is what it was always intended to do (the main point of what we were debating about on this subject, since you were saying it only applies to K-3) to cover through 12th grade. it still doesn't define anything for the teachers, such as what "discussion means" and is creating again an environment of fear. It's stil a curtailment of people's free speech rights. It's still all of those things. But it's an expansion.

I just gave you literal facts. The year before that it was Kem vs. Hidlay at 174 , with a relative wash but advantage NC State because of the head to head win, 184 clear advantage NC State, 197 clear advantage Iowa (all of this is discounting heavyweight, where Iowa holds a clear advantage. That year UNI went 2-2 at 174, Keckeisen took 3rd, and DNQ at 197 again. The year before that (2021) Kemerer took second at 174 while NC State DNQ and UNI went 0-2. Hidlay took second at 184, Brands went 1-2, and Keckeisen took 3rd. At 197, Warner took 4th, NC State went 0-2, and UNI again didn't qualify. Two years before that (Due to COVID) Iowa DNQ at 174, NC State went 1-2, and UNI also DNQ. At 184, Wilcke went 2-2, Reenan went 0-2 for NC State, and Foster won it for UNI. At 197, freshman Jacob Warner took 7th, Malik McDonald went 1-2 for NC State and UNI again DNQ. The year before that, Joey Gunther went 0-2 for Iowa at 174, Daniel Bullard went 1-2 for NC State, and Taylor Lujan lost in the blood round for UNI. Mitchell Bowman went 2-2 at 184, Pete Renda went 2-2 and lost in the blood round for NC State, and Drew Foster went 1-2 for UNI. At 197, Cash Wilcke went 3-2 and lost in the blood round for Iowa, Mike Macchiavello won it for NC State and Jacob Holschlag came in unseeded but placed 5th. 7 All Americans for Iowa, 5 for NC State, 5 for UNI.

Are Gabe Arnold and Keegan O'Toole in the transfer portal?

You're just trying to bag on Iowa for some reason. Iowa at those weights just went 5th-DNP-5th. UNI has Keckeisen and then did not qualify at either of the other weights. NC State has Hidlay, but went 0-2 at 174 and 1-2 at 197, both of their guys losing to their Iowa counterparts. Your blinded by your biases.

Listen man, lets not get crazy. I would expect Penn State to be favored to land most any transfer or recruit they actively seek, but the bolded part is just asinine. The only reason a wrestler in that weight range would go to Iowa is because NOBODY ELSE would take them? It's the second most successful college program going right now, has the biggest fanbase, and has world class coaches. Not being better than Penn State is not the same thing as being bad.

I'd favor Brooks in that stylistic matchup.

I wanted to correct the record, my apologies @mspart. I led you astray. This law hasn't been expanded to up to 8th grade. It covers all the way up to 12th grade (so that's all of school) and this is just a clarification, not an expansion. According to the DeSantis administration official quoted here, it has always applied to all grades. https://apnews.com/article/desantis-florida-dont-say-gay-ban-684ed25a303f83208a89c556543183cb

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/04/19/florida-desantis-travel-records-00092969 We continue the degradation of the separation of powers as Florida's legislature is now little more than Puddin' Fingers' little rubber stamp.

Important to notebthese aren't definitely happening as of yet.

Is this the guy you were talking about after the tournament?

The charge is sexual battery. In Florida, that incorporates rape under sexual battery, but Oklahoma law appears to differentiate that.

https://www.flowrestling.org/articles/10889313-ncaa-rules-committee-proposes-massive-changes And there are a BUNCH of them. 3 point take downs, 3 nearfall points for a 3 count, no riding time point unless you get back points, changing the requirement of top wrestlers that they have to be working to turn/pin rather than just ride, removing the "no reaction time" rear standing TD....plus more!

It all depends. She may be changing her story, or not actually remember a lot if there was alcohol involved (I have not read any of the specific factual allegations in this case, or if I did, I don't remember them). So what if she's telling the prosecutor [SOMEWHAT GRAPHIC LANGUAGE] "well we were drinking, and I sort of blacked out, but I do remember him being on top of me...I don't remember feeling him inside me, but when I woke up the next day I was definitely sore like after I have sex..." That scenario it seems VERY LIKELY that, if true, there was sexual contact, but will a jury believe it beyond a reasonable doubt? That's the question a prosecutor is asking. Criminal cases are fluid, and you very often will have alleged victims who are gung ho at the state, but then change their mind as you get into the actual trying of the case. It also doesn't have to be as big a change in charge as that, even. I will often negotiate my clients pleading to lesser felony charges and getting probation.

Oh yeah. But defense attorneys ask for lesser charges all the time. "My guy is charged with crime A; you may have some difficulty proving crime A, but he's willing to plead to crime B, which is a lighter charge."

It could be that, but it cold be multiple other things. Oh that's easy. Probation on a misdemeanor battery. I make that request all the time.

It doesn't mean anything. Even that trial date is malleable, they get moved all the time. Now, for the record, I don't practice in Oklahoma, obviously, but for example here in Florida, trial dates move in cycles. We have Pre-Trial hearings that have an "assigned" Trial Term, so the court dockets show a case that is set for a April 19 pre-trial date and also set for trial on the next trial term in May. However, especially post-COVID shutdowns with a big backlog of cases, the odds of a case actually going to trial that quickly after the Pre-Trial date would be astronomically low UNLESS the Defendant insisted and demanded his right to a speedy trial. It's neutral, at least under Florida criminal practice. It's noteworthy, though, that the docket seems to show that the trial was set by the Ferrari's request, so it's possible he intends to fight this all the way out...or he could be playacting trying to get a good deal.

To...themselves?

Here we have a member of the DeSantis administration just threatening the company to "make nice" with DeSantis. You know, like in a functional democracy....no wait that's how they do it in Russia.

I don't care. Neither do most normal Floridians. When I go to Lake Buena Vista, the streets are well-maintained and clean, so that's a plus. I know I'm definitely against my tax dollars being used so that a wannabe tinpot dictator can exact revenge on people and entities that criticize him. Or being used to move undocumented immigrants from one non-Florida locale to another non-Florida locale for a photo-op. Or many other wasteful things that do nothing to improve my life or the state.

It is undeniable that Penn State has had, by far, the best recruiting in terms of NCAA success. Multiple classes with at least 3 or 4 top 10 p4p guys. But....that's not an insult? That's a huge component of the job, arguably the biggest.

I'm sure glad my tax dollars are going to yet another DeSantis quagmire. He's stating here that he's literally going to change a law (or multiple laws) to go back and then invalidate the Disney agreement, implicitly admitting that what Disney did is perfectly legal. Meatball Ron, big "small government" guy.

Unlikely. Looks like it's just a pre-trial/scheduling date. Unless he's taking a plea tomorrow, nothing of note is likely to happen.

His attorney filed a Motion for Discovery. Standard practice, basically you're telling the prosecutor "hey, you have to turn over any evidence you have to me so I can prepare my defense." The other language appears to be related to disclosure of the actual document being barred because it references some kind of protected or sensitive information, typically something like social security numbers or witness/victim's addresses, etc. Nothing noteworthy, at least in what you've shared there.