VakAttack

Dean Peterson retweeted this, so it seems official.

Great minds, sir.

The same argument applies to Welsh, you weirdo.

Why is it all the more reason to hold his ground? You just saying that doesn't make it so. "Look, your girlfriend cheated on you but she's SUPER hot, so you have to suck it up..."

You just keep saying things are facts that aren't facts to try to give your argument more credibility, lol. Like, Rocco Welsh saying something doesn't make the content of the statement a fact. You're just twisting yourself into knots to defend against something that doesn't require a defense. It's not illegal what Penn State did, but they almost definitely did it. At least you're starting to admit that some of your "facts" are actually opinions, although you're just trying to shroud them in "widely held opinions are facts" as if this is some data-driven science experiment.

"Why won't this person show loyalty to this program that, in this instance, has not shown loyalty to him?" Penn State did what they thought was in their best interests with the intent to try to keep Ryder. Ryder has to do what he thinks in his best interest. This kid specifically is somebody who moved to PA and skipped wrestling his senior year, he was all in on Penn State, and was hurt by this.

Now we're being ridiculous.

So are you confirming the commitment?

I think CSUB announced he won some sort of scholarship award for good grades.

Wait, what?

AJ in the lab trying to come up with a way to combine a Tar Heel or a Ram into his trademark 5/7ths of a split celebration.

Hmmm...weird guess, but so weird it seems to know something.

Saint feels...not quite strong enough. Omniscient deity is more like it. That's the thing. You are calling things facts that are not facts. They are you interpreting circumstances in the way that is most favorable to your pre-decided position and then calling those interpretations facts. For example: Neither of these things are facts, they are opinions. After that, you're most relying on the statement of Welsh himself and insisting they are facts even though there's no evidence other than the word of Welsh, who is highly incentivized to make himself and his new institution look as good as possible, and dismissing disinterested parties, like Willie Saylor or Justin Basch (although you could argue Mr. Basch is a somewhat interested party) making the immediate reports. Everything after that just seems like window dressing to most of the rest of us, since he never actually met with anybody, but more ofa reaction of it looking bad that he had already committed to Penn State immediately after being in the portal. And I want to be clear, I'm not stating that what I am saying is fact. Clearly I'm stating my opinion based on what we're seeing; I would just posit that most of the non-Penn State fanbase would say my interpretation is the more likely and logical way it played out. Later you accuse me of being salty about previous accusations against Iowa, but no, I believe Iowa probably did a lot of the things we're talking about here, too. That's the game now, whether you like it or not, and Penn State is playing it, which you appear to be doing everything in your power to convince yourself they are not.

No. You are choosing to interpret things in the way that most aligns with what you want to be true.

And why are you hypothesizing this, the best possible version of events for Penn State?

Totally.

Sure. Any day now....

If this is correct, than I think it's a pretty clear win for Smith.

So to be clear, only one side of this war was tariffed, and it wasn't the side who initiated the war?

Hmmm....who is on the other side of that war? Were they tariffed?

Penguins are the most liberal bird, everybody knows this.

You're never gonna guess---ok, you can probably guess which country it is, comrades. https://www.axios.com/2025/04/02/trump-tariffs-russia-ukraine-ceasefire