Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, jajensen09 said:

Wrong again! Minto was more aggressive! And was better in almost every scramble. Psu just needed another  bail out!

🤣 🤣 🤣

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted (edited)

McEnelly really going after it during the tiebreakers suggests to me that eliminating OT in favor of criteria would be a good idea. I'd love to see that type of energy in regulation.

Also, I'd love to see step outs result in shot clocks. Some of these guys are not taking many offensive risks, and then they're ending up in the tiebreakers. 

Edited by peanut
Posted

Max gets called stalling when obviously circling in during the first period.  Welsh runs for :57 seconds in overtime and not a warning until :06 seconds left.  Total home cooking.

Posted
1 minute ago, peanut said:

McEnelly really going after it during the tiebreakers suggests to me that eliminating OT in favor of criteria would be a good idea. 

Also, I'd love to see step outs result in a shot clocks. Some of these guys are not taking many offensive risks, and then they're ending up in the tiebreakers. 

Seems like the lesson for Mcnelly is to believe in his offense a little more, he should get that one should they wrestle again

Posted
1 minute ago, MNRodent said:

Max gets called stalling when obviously circling in during the first period.  Welsh runs for :57 seconds in overtime and not a warning until :06 seconds left.  Total home cooking.

It’s standard operating. Stalling isn’t called as often as it should in general. At this point just cut the BS with the token stalls - it’s a mockery. 

Posted

Awful call.  Tired of tiebreakers though.  Just do a full SV period, and if still scoreless,  another SV period with step out points awarded.

Posted

Anyone else think there might have been a slam after the whistle during the first TB period?

Craig Henning got screwed in the 2007 NCAA Finals.

Posted
1 minute ago, LemonPie said:

Awful call.  Tired of tiebreakers though.  Just do a full SV period, and if still scoreless,  another SV period with step out points awarded.

I like this. (Also mat side weigh ins and our sport is perfect)

Posted
2 minutes ago, LemonPie said:

Awful call.  Tired of tiebreakers though.  Just do a full SV period, and if still scoreless,  another SV period with step out points awarded.

Yes!

Full of un-bias blasphemy. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...