War just broke out

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

https://x.com/AlinejadMasih/status/2027398752886030508

The link could not be embedded because x.com does not allow embedding of that tweet.

I wonder why it’s not allowed?

From the tweet 

I am a woman from Iran. Let me tell you honestly how women like me see politicians like you in America, women who speak about freedom from the safety of Congress while sympathizing with our killers under Islamic regimes. You stand next to the American flag, speaking about freedom. Now you launch campaigns saying, “No War With Iran.” Now I want to introduce you to a brave Iranian woman who understood America better than you ever will. Her name is Sara Saeidi. Born and raised in Iran. 39 years old. A mother of two daughters, 19 and 6. She was shot in the head for the “crime” of peacefully protesting while wearing a sweatshirt that said MANHATTAN, with the American flag beneath it. While you stood in Congress under that flag, she carried its name on her chest, not as symbolism for a photo opportunity but as a dream. Three days after she was killed, her body was returned to her family only after threats and money were taken from them. They were banned from holding a proper funeral. Authorities falsified the circumstances of her death. That is the regime you refuse to confront clearly. She wanted the freedom Manhattan represents, the freedom to live without fear, without morality police, without a bullet in her head. The same freedom protected by the Constitution you swore to uphold. You speak of “No War With Iran,” but you refuse to condemn the war being waged against us, the Iranian people, by the Islamic Republic. More than 30,000 unarmed civilians have been killed. Women blinded. Teenagers hanged. Mothers executed. When American lawmakers like you reduce this reality to a partisan talking point, you do the regime’s work for it. Dictatorships thrive when moral clarity disappears and when lawmakers choose ambiguity instead of standing firmly with victims. You call yourself anti war. But where is your condemnation of the regime’s massacre? Where is your outrage at its war against its own people? You are anti-Iranian women. Peace without justice is surrender. Your hatred of President Trump appears stronger than your love for America, stronger than your love for Manhattan, for freedom, for women’s rights. That is why you sound sympathetic to the Islamic Republic while remaining silent about women like Sara, like me, and like millions of Iranians who are victims of this barbaric regime. You celebrating hijab day in Manhattan in beautiful New York and watching women get killed in Iran for not wearing hijab. I dare you to share the picture of Sara, and say no to the war being wage by Islamist terrorist on us, Iranians.

[El Luchador]

Can you imagine living so hopelessly, and the one possible hope comes from the country that your country swore to destroy. Literally begging for your enemy to liberate your people.

[JimmySpeaks]

Death to America, but please save us first. 

[Scouts Honor]

no walmarts in iran

only targets

[Lipdrag]

No attack on stolen land can be illegal. 

The Medes want all of what is now called Persia back.  These newcomer Persians just genocided the Medes who were a peace loving race of hunter gatherers and the Persians should now give it back.  With reparations.

Oh, and Muslims, too, have just taken the land of people there before them - Pagans, Jews, Christians, Hindus, and many other races and religions.  Everyone has to go back to where they were in . . . 10,000 B.C.  Jews back across the Red Sea, Pharaohs leading again in Egypt, etc.  Because that was the pure state of the world and the migration of people and everything that has happened since then must be erased and labelled as land stealing.  Neanderthals want their mountain caves back.

[Doublehalf]

17 hours ago, StillUndefeated said:

Oh man, war has started. There are huge explosions going off right near my house.

First and foremost- I hope you, your family and all those you know stay safe. Has to be very surreal and frightening when bombs are dropping near your home.

If you get a chance, can you share what the generals thoughts of this are from the Iranian point of view? Do they welcome this intervention? Did they want to take care of it themselves? Are they pissed as all hell?

Any information would be welcomed.

[Caveira]

 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

 

I wonder if he had time to eat that karma sammich 

[uncle bernard]

 

[1032004]

18 hours ago, Caveira said:

From the tweet 

I am a woman from Iran. Let me tell you honestly how women like me see politicians like you in America, women who speak about freedom from the safety of Congress while sympathizing with our killers under Islamic regimes. You stand next to the American flag, speaking about freedom. Now you launch campaigns saying, “No War With Iran.” Now I want to introduce you to a brave Iranian woman who understood America better than you ever will. Her name is Sara Saeidi. Born and raised in Iran. 39 years old. A mother of two daughters, 19 and 6. She was shot in the head for the “crime” of peacefully protesting while wearing a sweatshirt that said MANHATTAN, with the American flag beneath it. While you stood in Congress under that flag, she carried its name on her chest, not as symbolism for a photo opportunity but as a dream. Three days after she was killed, her body was returned to her family only after threats and money were taken from them. They were banned from holding a proper funeral. Authorities falsified the circumstances of her death. That is the regime you refuse to confront clearly. She wanted the freedom Manhattan represents, the freedom to live without fear, without morality police, without a bullet in her head. The same freedom protected by the Constitution you swore to uphold. You speak of “No War With Iran,” but you refuse to condemn the war being waged against us, the Iranian people, by the Islamic Republic. More than 30,000 unarmed civilians have been killed. Women blinded. Teenagers hanged. Mothers executed. When American lawmakers like you reduce this reality to a partisan talking point, you do the regime’s work for it. Dictatorships thrive when moral clarity disappears and when lawmakers choose ambiguity instead of standing firmly with victims. You call yourself anti war. But where is your condemnation of the regime’s massacre? Where is your outrage at its war against its own people? You are anti-Iranian women. Peace without justice is surrender. Your hatred of President Trump appears stronger than your love for America, stronger than your love for Manhattan, for freedom, for women’s rights. That is why you sound sympathetic to the Islamic Republic while remaining silent about women like Sara, like me, and like millions of Iranians who are victims of this barbaric regime. You celebrating hijab day in Manhattan in beautiful New York and watching women get killed in Iran for not wearing hijab. I dare you to share the picture of Sara, and say no to the war being wage by Islamist terrorist on us, Iranians.

It doesn’t seem like what Iran was doing to its people was really the reason for the attack though.

[Caveira]

44 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

It doesn’t seem like what Iran was doing to its people was really the reason for the attack though.

I know you know all.  What was it then ?

[Rassling]

don’t fall for it 1032004. It’s obvious where he wants this convo to go. Don’t go there.

[Bigbrog]

56 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

It doesn’t seem like what Iran was doing to its people was really the reason for the attack though.

[1032004]

56 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I know you know all.  What was it then ?

The stated reason was that we didn’t want them to have a nuclear weapon

[El Luchador]

11 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

The stated reason was that we didn’t want them to have a nuclear weapon

One of America's demands was the Ayatollah had to give up power.

[red viking]

21 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Why didn’t Dems use those files when they had four years to unleash them?  They spent four years trying to lock him up and convicted him of nothing.  No way theyd pass on using the files if there was anything of value in them.   

OMG can you be any dumber? There's obviously not enough there to convict him. That's not what this is about you moron. They already investigated the underage rape accusations against Trump and the woman with the most extreme allegations supposedly committed suicide. You need to be sure "beyond a reasonable doubt" to convict somebody and pretty close to that to even press charges. A lot less to get an indictment and that's why Trumptard is going that route to get democrats. 

However, we should shed the light on this thing so the people can decide for themselves whether Trump "likely" is a pedophile and rapist. Looks pretty clear to me that he likely is but let's look at even more of the evidence, including the media, so we can make a more thorough evaluation. 

[Caveira]

18 minutes ago, red viking said:

OMG can you be any dumber? There's obviously not enough there to convict him. That's not what this is about you moron. They already investigated the underage rape accusations against Trump and the woman with the most extreme allegations supposedly committed suicide. You need to be sure "beyond a reasonable doubt" to convict somebody and pretty close to that to even press charges. A lot less to get an indictment and that's why Trumptard is going that route to get democrats. 

However, we should shed the light on this thing so the people can decide for themselves whether Trump "likely" is a pedophile and rapist. Looks pretty clear to me that he likely is but let's look at even more of the evidence, including the media, so we can make a more thorough evaluation. 

 

[El Luchador]

35 minutes ago, red viking said:

OMG can you be any dumber? There's obviously not enough there to convict him. That's not what this is about you moron. They already investigated the underage rape accusations against Trump and the woman with the most extreme allegations supposedly committed suicide. You need to be sure "beyond a reasonable doubt" to convict somebody and pretty close to that to even press charges. A lot less to get an indictment and that's why Trumptard is going that route to get democrats. 

However, we should shed the light on this thing so the people can decide for themselves whether Trump "likely" is a pedophile and rapist. Looks pretty clear to me that he likely is but let's look at even more of the evidence, including the media, so we can make a more thorough evaluation. 

When you going to answer how we should deal with those he have evidence on? It's amazing how you constantly refuse to apply your disgust for this behavior only to the man with no proof he did anything and lots of prof he didn't.  

Should we apply your justice plan to the Great Prince or  former president Bill Clinton? Or are you just a raving hypocrite?

[red viking]

23 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

When you going to answer how we should deal with those he have evidence on? It's amazing how you constantly refuse to apply your disgust for this behavior only to the man with no proof he did anything and lots of prof he didn't.  

Should we apply your justice plan to the Great Prince or  former president Bill Clinton? Or are you just a raving hypocrite?

WAY more evidence against Trump than Clinton. 

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, red viking said:

WAY more evidence against Trump than Clinton. 

 

[red viking]

44 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

You're a huge idiot if u think Bill Clinton would determine what Trump didn't do at epstein Island. 

[El Luchador]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

WAY more evidence against Trump than Clinton. 

Not even close to true. He has been named specifically by known girls who were trafficked, and had been advised to stop going to the island. His Secret Service had complained he was endangering himself by traveling to the island without his security. There are photos of him in compromising scenarios and of course his name on FAA flight logs. There is more evidence against Bill than any other person. 

So how should we handle Bill? 

Edited March 1 by El Luchador

[red viking]

51 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Not even close to true. He has been named specifically by known girls who were trafficked, and had been advised to stop going to the island. His Secret Service had complained he was endangering himself by traveling to the island without his security. There are photos of him in compromising scenarios and of course his name on FAA flight logs. There is more evidence against Bill than any other person. 

So how should we handle Bill? 

Trump was directly accused by a victim ( with sick details) and under investigation. Clinton wasn't, for either. 

Epstein files also make it obvious he was the pedo rapist. 

Edited March 1 by red viking

[red viking]

[red viking]