More fraud

[1032004]

6 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I’ve never defended Scott. I’ve said nothing more than he wasn’t charged nor did he pay anything personally.  You’re lying.  

And yet you said Walz was guilty despite no evidence 

[JimmySpeaks]

8 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

But you’ve already stated Walz should go to jail, so clearly you think he knew about it and did nothing.  Which of course is a lie as his office tried to stop it.

Meanwhile, you’ve continually defended Scott even though his company was convicted and he resigned (which of course Walz hasn’t done).   And it wasn’t just “someone committing fraud someplace in the company,” it was the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history at the time.

Yep if Walz knew he NEEDS to be held accountable.  As does the state of Minnesota.  If Scott knew he needed to be held accountable as should the company.  In Scott’s case the company was held accountable but he personally wasn’t.   The jury is still out on tampon Timmy the taxer as there are people that have said they told him. 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

And yet you said Walz was guilty despite no evidence 

I said he should go to jail 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

And yet you said Walz was guilty despite no evidence 

You certainly change words a lot. Why??? 

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

And yet you said Walz was guilty despite no evidence 

• Whistleblower Claims:Dozens of current and former state employees have come forward claiming they were retaliated against or silenced by their supervisors when they tried to report the fraud internally.
• Evidence of Internal Misconduct: A legislative audit found that state workers in the Behavioral Health Administration fabricated and backdated documents to hide their lack of oversight from auditors.
• Ongoing Investigations:Federal authorities, including the FBI and the Department of Justice, continue to investigate the "industrial-scale fraud" and have hinted that more indictments are expected as they untangle the networks involving hundreds of companies.

[headshuck]

Walz - profound failure of executive oversight.

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

 

So you’re saying there weren’t any state employees that committed fraud?????? 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

 

• Whistleblower Claims:Dozens of current and former state employees have come forward claiming they were retaliated against or silenced by their supervisors when they tried to report the fraud internally.
• Evidence of Internal Misconduct: A legislative audit found that state workers in the Behavioral Health Administration fabricated and backdated documents to hide their lack of oversight from auditors.
• Ongoing Investigations:Federal authorities, including the FBI and the Department of Justice, continue to investigate the "industrial-scale fraud" and have hinted that more indictments are expected as they untangle the networks involving hundreds of companies.

More pesky facts that he’ll ignore. 

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I said he should go to jail 

 

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You certainly change words a lot. Why??? 

lol wut?  Are you in favor of sending innocent people to jail?  If you think he should go to jail that means you think he is guilty 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

 

lol wut?  Are you in favor of sending innocent people to jail?  If you think he should go to jail that means you think he is guilty 

As I’ve stated just above. If he’s guilty, and there are people that say he knew, then he should be locked up.  That’s wut 

[JimmySpeaks]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

lol wut?  Are you in favor of sending innocent people to jail?  If you think he should go to jail that means you think he is guilty 

You should read some of those pesky facts that Cav just posted.  

Edited April 6 by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

lol wut?  Are you in favor of sending innocent people to jail?  If you think he should go to jail that means you think he is guilty 

And yes I think he’s guilty.  Just like Braves thinks Scott is guilty.  What’s your point??? 

Edited April 6 by JimmySpeaks

[1032004]

7 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

• Whistleblower Claims:Dozens of current and former state employees have come forward claiming they were retaliated against or silenced by their supervisors when they tried to report the fraud internally.
• Evidence of Internal Misconduct: A legislative audit found that state workers in the Behavioral Health Administration fabricated and backdated documents to hide their lack of oversight from auditors.
• Ongoing Investigations:Federal authorities, including the FBI and the Department of Justice, continue to investigate the "industrial-scale fraud" and have hinted that more indictments are expected as they untangle the networks involving hundreds of companies.

 

6 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

More pesky facts that he’ll ignore. 

These aren’t facts, they’re a copy paste from AI and he just repeated the same stuff he posted a few minutes ago.  Some state employees were trying to cover themselves because an audit was happening, that doesn’t mean they committed fraud.  The rest is just hearsay.

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

And yes I think he’s guilty.  Just like Braves thinks Scott is guilty.  What’s your point??? 

You think Walz is guilty but won’t say the same about Scott, even though there is far more evidence against him.

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

 

These aren’t facts, they’re a copy paste from AI and he just repeated the same stuff he posted a few minutes ago.  Some state employees were trying to cover themselves because an audit was happening, that doesn’t mean they committed fraud.  The rest is just hearsay.

9 billion disappeared.  This is not just rando Somalians.   Government isn’t good at prosecuting itself either.   As they are corrupt af 

[1032004]

9 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you’re saying there weren’t any state employees that committed fraud?????? 

Any?  I don’t know.  But if there were they’re far down the list of perpetrators.

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

These aren’t facts, they’re a copy paste from AI and he just repeated the same stuff he posted a few minutes ago.  Some state employees were trying to cover themselves because an audit was happening, that doesn’t mean they committed fraud.  The rest is just hearsay.

So you have proof Timmy didn’t know??? 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Any?  I don’t know.  But if there were they’re far down the list of perpetrators.

How far down the list????  Please show us.  

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

9 billion disappeared.  

We don’t know that 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you have proof Timmy didn’t know??? 

I have proof he tried to stop Feeding our Future

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

You think Walz is guilty but won’t say the same about Scott, even though there is far more evidence against him.

AGAIN. I said Scott wasn’t charged or personally paid anything.  Please (third request) show me where I said anything other than that.   I’m waiting.  

[JimmySpeaks]

Just now, 1032004 said:

I have proof he tried to stop Feeding our Future

So the answer is no.  Got it. 

[1032004]

Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

So the answer is no.  Got it. 

The article you replied to said he should be charged because he knew about it “and did nothing.”  He didn’t do nothing, he tried to stop it.

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

AGAIN. I said Scott wasn’t charged or personally paid anything.  Please (third request) show me where I said anything other than that.   I’m waiting.  

I’m not saying you did. I’m saying you think Walz is guilty despite no evidence, but won’t say the same about Scott, despite evidence.

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

The article you replied to said he should be charged because he knew about it “and did nothing.”  He didn’t do nothing, he tried to stop it.

Which article is that?