More fraud

[red viking]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Ok Comrade 

You're one of the biggest idiots on here by far. You swallow up all the fox news b.s. and I've literally never seen one indication of critical thinking from you. 

All u do is repeat rt wing talking pts. You've swallowed it all, hook, line and sinker. 

You probably have fix news on all day in the background at your house. 

Edited April 5 by red viking

[JimmySpeaks]

Just now, red viking said:

You're one of the biggest idiots on here by far. You swallow up all the fox news b.s. and I've literally never seen one indication of critical thinking from you. 

You probably have fix news on all day in the background at your house. 

As long as you’re here I’ll never be the biggest idiot. You’ve got that locked down.   

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

You're one of the biggest idiots on here by far. You swallow up all the fox news b.s. and I've literally never seen one indication of critical thinking from you. 

You probably have fix news on all day in the background at your house. 

You’re on record saying you never read/watch anything from the right side.  Guess that means you only take in the commie sheeple news on the left.  Oh the hypocrisy.  

[1032004]

On 4/2/2026 at 5:26 PM, JimmySpeaks said:

I can’t wait for you to say Tim Walz should be locked up for allowing fraud to happen in Minnesota.  

Actually you have said that.  Thanks for confirming your hypocrisy.

 

On 12/7/2025 at 1:33 PM, JimmySpeaks said:

https://www.kttc.com/2025/12/04/congressional-letter-claims-walz-fully-aware-fraud-requests-documentation/

 

Tampon Timmy the taxer about to get his due 

 

On 12/7/2025 at 1:36 PM, El Luchador said:

What a disgusting, corrupt con man. He better get arrested for this.

 

On 12/7/2025 at 1:52 PM, JimmySpeaks said:

Yep. He needs to do time 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

46 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Actually you have said that.  Thanks for confirming your hypocrisy.

 

 

 

 

You really are that stupid aren’t you ?  Context is a thing you  

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You really are that stupid aren’t you ?  Context is a thing you  

You don’t think Rick Scott was even aware of the enormous fraud in the company he was CEO of?  You’re a hypocrite, it’s okay you can admit it 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

You don’t think Rick Scott was even aware of the enormous fraud in the company he was CEO of?  You’re a hypocrite, it’s okay you can admit it 

So you’re saying Walz knew about the fraud in Minnesota then right?  Come on hypocrite say it. 

Edited April 5 by JimmySpeaks

[1032004]

16 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you’re saying Walz knew about the fraud in Minnesota then right?  Come on hypocrite say it. 

Way to avoid the question, lol

[JimmySpeaks]

11 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Way to avoid the question, lol

As are you.  It’s not my fault you didn’t understand why I was waiting for him to say Walz was guilty.  

[1032004]

59 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

As are you.  It’s not my fault you didn’t understand why I was waiting for him to say Walz was guilty.  

Except you already said Walz was guilty lol, you can’t keep track of your own arguments.  That was based on a partisan letter backed up by zero evidence, from a guy who has a history of writing partisan letters backed up by zero evidence and then never actually following up on his claims.

But sure, Walz probably was “aware” of some of the fraud…considering his office tried to stop it.  Remember when you thought Jim Jordan “owned” him in that clip where it was actually Jordan that was wrong?  That was referencing a time when Walz’s office tried to stop the payments to Feeding our Future.

So you think Walz should go to jail because of a claim he was aware of fraud and allegedly did nothing.  Do you think Rick Scott was aware of the fraud at his company and if so do you think he should have went to jail?  Please don’t answer with a question.

[JimmySpeaks]

5 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Except you already said Walz was guilty lol, you can’t keep track of your own arguments.  That was based on a partisan letter backed up by zero evidence, from a guy who has a history of writing partisan letters backed up by zero evidence and then never actually following up on his claims.

But sure, Walz probably was “aware” of some of the fraud…considering his office tried to stop it.  Remember when you thought Jim Jordan “owned” him in that clip where it was actually Jordan that was wrong?  That was referencing a time when Walz’s office tried to stop the payments to Feeding our Future.

So you think Walz should go to jail because of a claim he was aware of fraud and allegedly did nothing.  Do you think Rick Scott was aware of the fraud at his company and if so do you think he should have went to jail?  Please don’t answer with a question.

I said I can wait for HIM (braves) to say he’s guilty.  Damn you’re dumb.  

[JimmySpeaks]

5 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Except you already said Walz was guilty lol, you can’t keep track of your own arguments.  That was based on a partisan letter backed up by zero evidence, from a guy who has a history of writing partisan letters backed up by zero evidence and then never actually following up on his claims.

But sure, Walz probably was “aware” of some of the fraud…considering his office tried to stop it.  Remember when you thought Jim Jordan “owned” him in that clip where it was actually Jordan that was wrong?  That was referencing a time when Walz’s office tried to stop the payments to Feeding our Future.

So you think Walz should go to jail because of a claim he was aware of fraud and allegedly did nothing.  Do you think Rick Scott was aware of the fraud at his company and if so do you think he should have went to jail?  Please don’t answer with a question.

So you’re slow it’s funny.  

[1032004]

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I said I can wait for HIM (braves) to say he’s guilty.  Damn you’re dumb.  

I know.  You were implying you don’t think Walz is guilty, so you wanted him to bring him up.  Except in a different thread you said you thought Walz was guilty.  lol.

[JimmySpeaks]

4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I know.  You were implying you don’t think Walz is guilty, so you wanted him to bring him up.  Except in a different thread you said you thought Walz was guilty.  lol.

I was implying that if he’s going to say one is guilty then so is the other one.  lol. U r  F u k I n g s l o w 

[1032004]

10 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I was implying that if he’s going to say one is guilty then so is the other one.  lol. U r  F u k I n g s l o w 

As I said earlier…being a CEO of a company that actually commits the fraud is different from being a governor where fraud is committed by people living in the state.

But what are you saying?  Walz is guilty but Scott is not?  Lol.

[JimmySpeaks]

17 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

As I said earlier…being a CEO of a company that actually commits the fraud is different from being a governor where fraud is committed by people living in the state.

But what are you saying?  Walz is guilty but Scott is not?  Lol.

Being the ceo of a company that commits fraud is no different than being the governor of a state that commits fraud.  Fraud was committed under the lead ship of both.  Either could have known about it or didn’t know at all about it.   
 

I worked for a very large corporate company.  If someone committed fraud someplace in the company chances are very good she wouldn’t have known it was happening until someone else found out and told her.  

Edited April 6 by JimmySpeaks

[red viking]

12 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Being the ceo of a company that commits fraud is no different than being the governor of a state that commits fraud.  Fraud was committed under the lead ship of both.  Either could have known about it or didn’t know at all about it.   
 

I worked for a very large corporate company.  If someone committed fraud someplace in the company chances are very good she wouldn’t have known it was happening until someone else found out and told her.  

"The STATE" committed fraud? Please explain

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

"The STATE" committed fraud? Please explain

And those that work for the state have a ceo. It’s called the governor.   
 

Oh and it was people that committed the fraud.  

Edited April 6 by JimmySpeaks

[1032004]

14 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Being the ceo of a company that commits fraud is no different than being the governor of a state that commits fraud.  Fraud was committed under the lead ship of both.  Either could have known about it or didn’t know at all about it.   
 

I worked for a very large corporate company.  If someone committed fraud someplace in the company chances are very good she wouldn’t have known it was happening until someone else found out and told her.  

But you’ve already stated Walz should go to jail, so clearly you think he knew about it and did nothing.  Which of course is a lie as his office tried to stop it.

Meanwhile, you’ve continually defended Scott even though his company was convicted and he resigned (which of course Walz hasn’t done).   And it wasn’t just “someone committing fraud someplace in the company,” it was the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history at the time.

[1032004]

13 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

And those that work for the state have a ceo. It’s called the governor.   
 

Oh and it was people that committed the fraud.  

So you’re saying the fraud in Minnesota was committed by state employees?

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

But you’ve already stated Walz should go to jail, so clearly you think he knew about it and did nothing.  Which of course is a lie as his office tried to stop it.

Meanwhile, you’ve continually defended Scott even though his company was convicted and he resigned (which of course Walz hasn’t done).   And it wasn’t just “someone committing fraud someplace in the company,” it was the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history at the time.

I’ve never defended Scott. I’ve said nothing more than he wasn’t charged nor did he pay anything personally.  You’re lying.  

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

So you’re saying the fraud in Minnesota was committed by state employees?

Based on recent reports, investigations indicate that Minnesota state employees in the Department of Human Services (DHS) mismanaged funds, fabricated documents to hide actions during audits, and ignored warnings about massive fraud in programs like Feeding Our Future

. While external, complex fraud rings primarily stole the money, state workers are accused of enabling it through negligence, failure to act, and, in some cases, collusion. 

 

Key findings regarding state employee involvement:

• Fabrication of Records: A legislative audit found staff in the Behavioral Health Administration (a division of DHS) backdated and created new documents to conceal mismanagement of state money.
• Negligence and Mismanagement: State employees are accused of ignoring fraud warnings, with auditors noting that staff tasked with oversight were failing to detect fraud.
• Conflicts of Interest:Reports indicate that a manager who approved a large, fraudulent payment to a provider later became a paid consultant for that same company.
• Whistleblower Retaliation: Over 400 government workers claimed they warned leadership and Gov. Tim Walz of the fraud but were met with retaliation, threats, and a failure to act. 
   

While the Feeding Our Future scheme involved external fraudsters stealing hundreds of millions, the scandal highlighted a breakdown in oversight within state government, causing many to claim the state was complicit in the massive fraud

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

So you’re saying the fraud in Minnesota was committed by state employees?

Where did I say that?   I said people committed the fraud.  Which again is a fact.  You’re terrible at this.  
 

that being said people that work for the state are kinda the state aren’t they.  

Edited April 6 by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

Based on recent reports, investigations indicate that Minnesota state employees in the Department of Human Services (DHS) mismanaged funds, fabricated documents to hide actions during audits, and ignored warnings about massive fraud in programs like Feeding Our Future

. While external, complex fraud rings primarily stole the money, state workers are accused of enabling it through negligence, failure to act, and, in some cases, collusion. 

 

Key findings regarding state employee involvement:

• Fabrication of Records: A legislative audit found staff in the Behavioral Health Administration (a division of DHS) backdated and created new documents to conceal mismanagement of state money.
• Negligence and Mismanagement: State employees are accused of ignoring fraud warnings, with auditors noting that staff tasked with oversight were failing to detect fraud.
• Conflicts of Interest:Reports indicate that a manager who approved a large, fraudulent payment to a provider later became a paid consultant for that same company.
• Whistleblower Retaliation: Over 400 government workers claimed they warned leadership and Gov. Tim Walz of the fraud but were met with retaliation, threats, and a failure to act. 
   

While the Feeding Our Future scheme involved external fraudsters stealing hundreds of millions, the scandal highlighted a breakdown in oversight within state government, causing many to claim the state was complicit in the massive fraud

Those pesky facts.  

[1032004]

4 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Where did I say that?   I said people committed the fraud.  Which again is a fact.  You’re terrible at this.  
 

that being said people that work for the state are kinda the state aren’t they.  

 

20 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

 those that work for the state