Call It The Dresser Dump

[Wrestleknownothing]

I was looking at the new Selection Criteria Grid for this season and I noticed this addition:

Eligible Matches

Only results from nontraditional events that are registered in the NWCA Optimal Performance Calculator (OPC) system by September 1, and contested before January 1 of the respective academic year, shall be considered for selection and seeding for the Division I Wrestling Championships.

Additional Comments

This modification clarifies that the committee will not consider results from nontraditional matches that have become more common later in the season. This is consistent with the value the committee places on traditional formats, (dual meets, individual/dual advancement tournaments), and conference tournament participation to meet the selection criteria.

Edited February 13 by Wrestleknownothing

[1032004]

Does this count “extra matches”?

[Wrestleknownothing]

18 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Does this count “extra matches”?

Corby thinks it is about extra matches

[flyingcement]

Very interesting!  not a bad workaround IMO

[wrestle87]

Please help, I don't understand what this is referring to...

[flyingcement]

2 minutes ago, wrestle87 said:

Please help, I don't understand what this is referring to...

Iowa State created a tournament at the end of the season I thought that was for the benefit of inflating match counts for those in need.  If it's extra matches in question, that's not it, but that's what I thought was being alluded to.

[Hammerlock3]

15 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

Iowa State created a tournament at the end of the season I thought that was for the benefit of inflating match counts for those in need.  If it's extra matches in question, that's not it, but that's what I thought was being alluded to.

Yeah it was basically scheme to counterfeit RPI

[1032004]

1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Corby thinks it is about extra matches

Ok reading it closer I think you’re right.  But it says that a tournament is a “traditional match,” so seems like Last Chance Open is still legal?

[Wrestleknownothing]

5 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Ok reading it closer I think you’re right.  But it says that a tournament is a “traditional match,” so seems like Last Chance Open is still legal?

I think it may be both

[Phantom]

Nice play... cant help but think about "The Dresser Dump" producing a gilbillion state champs in Grundy and Christiansburg..

[bnwtwg]

tl;dr Last Chance = good for world team, fargo, etc. but bad for NCAAs

not oversimplifying in the slightest  

[ionel]

Where is @PortaJohn ?   

Edited February 13 by ionel

[PortaJohn]

9 hours ago, ionel said:

Where is @PortaJohn ?   

You down with OPC?  Who's down with OPC?

[666]

11 hours ago, Hammerlock3 said:

Yeah it was basically scheme to counterfeit RPI

Kinda sorta. But I'm cool with it. NCAA should update it's RPI to reflect reality, until then I'm okay with "last chance" tournaments. 

[Hammerlock3]

1 hour ago, 666 said:

Kinda sorta. But I'm cool with it. NCAA should update it's RPI to reflect reality, until then I'm okay with "last chance" tournaments. 

yeah the NCAA should just update that and then its killing it.

[Wrestleknownothing]

2 hours ago, 666 said:

Kinda sorta. But I'm cool with it. NCAA should update it's RPI to reflect reality, until then I'm okay with "last chance" tournaments. 

The NCAA did update the criteria for what gets included in RPI.

[Hillbilly Jim]

A follow up question to this:  when considering At-Large NCAA bid after conference tourneys, when they consider win percentage, is that before or after the conf tourneys where most guys needing at large bids will take 2 more losses?

[Wrestleknownothing]

28 minutes ago, Hillbilly Jim said:

A follow up question to this:  when considering At-Large NCAA bid after conference tourneys, when they consider win percentage, is that before or after the conf tourneys where most guys needing at large bids will take 2 more losses?

after

[1032004]

On 2/12/2025 at 10:45 PM, Wrestleknownothing said:

I think it may be both

But isn’t it just saying the tournament needs to be on the schedule by 9/1?  So if Dresser just plans for a Last Chance Open every year he’d be fine?

[Wrestleknownothing]

16 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

But isn’t it just saying the tournament needs to be on the schedule by 9/1?  So if Dresser just plans for a Last Chance Open every year he’d be fine?

It also says it needs to be completed by Jan 1.

What I am unsure about is who the registration requirement applies to, the event or the school attending the event. The notes from the meeting suggest the budgetary impact is that schools will not have the added expense of sending athletes to something that had not been budgeted or planned for. Since these last chance events are "pop up" events, I imagine they are not on anyone's schedule. This makes me think they are targeting the events through the schools' registration of schedules rather than the event being registered. But I may be reading too much into that unclear wording.