How in the world did the government spending get so far off the tracks? In less than a month Elon will and his 20 year olds will pry 1 trillion dollars out of the politicians cold dead hands. will

[Scouts Honor]

39 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

If a random private investigator from Erie PA says it, it must be true

why do you trust the govt agencies? 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Scouts Honor said:

why do you trust the govt agencies? 

I don’t always, but I probably trust them more than a random private investigator from Erie PA.  

[1032004]

 

 

[RockLobster]

5 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

why do you trust the govt agencies? 

Oversight.

Doesn't mean any of us trust them, but oversight is an absolute 100% minimum to qualify for any trust at all. It costs more, but it's well worth it.

If there is no oversight - there should be no trust. When money is involved, people tend to be wicked that way.

[Husker_Du]

oversight like losing billions of dollars or oversight like being trillions in debt or oversight like not being able to pass an audit? 

[Paul158]

4 hours ago, Husker_Du said:

oversight like losing billions of dollars or oversight like being trillions in debt or oversight like not being able to pass an audit? 

Yes, that one.

[Gene Mills Fan]

When money is involved, people tend to be wicked that way.

Agreed   But that sort of says the bigger the government the more the possibility of skimming of the top! 

Edited February 28 by Gene Mills Fan

[Scouts Honor]

6 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Oversight.

Doesn't mean any of us trust them, but oversight is an absolute 100% minimum to qualify for any trust at all. It costs more, but it's well worth it.

If there is no oversight - there should be no trust. When money is involved, people tend to be wicked that way.

there has been oversight the last 50 years... and you still dont see that there is no oversight

[Scouts Honor]

11 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I don’t always, but I probably trust them more than a random private investigator from Erie PA.  

why would you say that is?

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Scouts Honor said:

why would you say that is?

Because there are a lot more eyes on the government than a random private investigator from Erie PA

Edited February 28 by 1032004

[Scouts Honor]

oversight

just the latest disappearance of $24billion

 

[Scouts Honor]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Because there are a lot more eyes on the government than a random private investigator from Erie PA

lol 

[WrestlingRasta]

On 2/24/2025 at 7:47 PM, Husker_Du said:

it don't matter who was put in that role, the left would hate them all just the same. 

And that is different with the MAGA folks…..how exactly? 

[1032004]

3 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

lol 

Do you disagree with my statement?

[Scouts Honor]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Do you disagree with my statement?

yes i do.

everyone knows who the PI is... most people don't know the career bureaucrats in govt

[RockLobster]

16 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

there has been oversight the last 50 years... and you still dont see that there is no oversight

... and just imagine, if you can, how worse it would have been without any oversight at all.

[RockLobster]

16 hours ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

When money is involved, people tend to be wicked that way.

Agreed   But that sort of says the bigger the government the more the possibility of skimming of the top! 

Maybe. But I think maybe not.

Consider a gang of thieves:

• With a small gang, a few could influence and kill off others in order to keep the loot for themselves.
• As the gang gets larger, that same plan starts to become impossible. Too many people, too many eyes.

If we haven't learned that the government is a gang of thieves yet, we haven't learned a thing.

[Husker_Du]

16 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

And that is different with the MAGA folks…..how exactly? 

fair point. normally nothing. but in this case, the role didn't exist.

i realize both parties spend like nuts, but there is only one party that put in place a team to curb lesbian peacock research in Port-au-Prince and economic effects of climate change on sex workers in Thailand.

honestly, we definitely win this one. smooch! 

[1032004]

This is not ideal

 

 

 

[1032004]

On 2/15/2025 at 10:32 PM, pokemonster said:

Nothing wrong with getting a bj in the oval office. Who wouldn't. He wasn't slinging babies around to grow up in single parent households tho. 

Elon really slinging out the babies these days

 

 

 

[jross]

@1034004

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

This is not ideal

 

 

 

The twerp has no brains based on how he went about this reporting.  He is smart enough to recognize something as potentially "sensitive" and then stupid enough to amplify the specific details. 

There is a better way to handle and report on the risk.

[Gene Mills Fan]

6 hours ago, RockLobster said:

Maybe. But I think maybe not.

Consider a gang of thieves:

• With a small gang, a few could influence and kill off others in order to keep the loot for themselves.
• As the gang gets larger, that same plan starts to become impossible. Too many people, too many eyes.

If we haven't learned that the government is a gang of thieves yet, we haven't learned a thing.

 With a small gang, a few could influence and kill off others in order to keep the loot for themselves.

If the small gang kills off the others there is no more gang. A few get the loot and the game is over. There wasn't a need to have a lot of loot laying around to steal.  Losses at a minimum.

The larger gang of theives needs a fiscal collection to steal from and an amount of theft to support themselves.  The bigger the gang the bigger the amount that needs to be stolen.  Then the gang of thieves starts to demand even more of the entire fiscal collective.  

Is corruption a quantified group or possibly an inherent per centage of a group? I'm not sure.

If we haven't learned that the government is a gang of thieves yet, we haven't learned a thing.

So you know they are a gang of thieves and you want more of them? and you know to pay more eyes to watch every eye; the Government(gang of thieves) need more tax dollars.  Our dollar has to be backed by product and substance not legislation and bureaucracy.  

gang thieves.docx

[Scouts Honor]

8 hours ago, RockLobster said:

... and just imagine, if you can, how worse it would have been without any oversight at all.

lol

30 trillion in debt... how could it be worse 

[Paul158]

1 hour ago, Scouts Honor said:

lol

30 trillion in debt... how could it be worse 

Its 36.5 trillion right now. It goes up 2 million dollars every minute of every day. it just went up 2 million dollars as i wrote this. Pretty sad.

[Scouts Honor]

so im lookin to retire... any of you guys billionaires