Deportation Bill

[mspart]

6 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Does, or does not, a law already exist on the books to do just that?

Immigration law, as written and codified, is not being followed.   That's why we have an illegal alien problem.   There is already law to not let that happen but when the executive branch is derelict in their duty to uphold the law, you need to re address the situation.

mspart

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, mspart said:

Immigration law, as written and codified, is not being followed.   That's why we have an illegal alien problem.   There is already law to not let that happen but when the executive branch is derelict in their duty to uphold the law, you need to re address the situation.

mspart

Not to mention sanctuary cities flipping their noses at federal law 

[mspart]

Yes, I would create a bill to give no federal assistance to cities, counties, and states if they are not assisting federal law enforcement with regard to illegal aliens.  It would withhold all funding.   I doubt anyone will do that but it should be done.  

mspart

[Wrestleknownothing]

It surprises me, though it really should not, that you guys just cannot recognize the flaw in your thinking. You claim that the existing law is not being enforce therefore it makes sense to have a new, nearly duplicate law.

If existing laws are not being enforced then what difference does it make if you have one, or a dozen new identical laws? Since you are struggling with the concept I will answer for you. It makes no difference.

If it makes no difference then why are they doing this? My guess would be that they are playing a game of gotcha to generate selective outrage. If so, Mission Accomplished.

Now as to whether the existing law is being enforced. How are you sure it is not? https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-275-noncitizens-sex-offense-convictions-during-nation-wide-law

[mspart]

You are correct.   But with that logic, why have any laws at all if the exec branch can determine which ones they will enforce and which ones they will not.   But by passing a new law with support of most of the people int he country it sends a message.   Anger will follow if it is not enforced.   I think that is the power in a new law. 

mspart

[Wrestleknownothing]

49 minutes ago, mspart said:

You are correct.   But with that logic, why have any laws at all if the exec branch can determine which ones they will enforce and which ones they will not.   But by passing a new law with support of most of the people int he country it sends a message.   Anger will follow if it is not enforced.   I think that is the power in a new law. 

mspart

But the existing law IS being enforced.

[mspart]

Hence we have millions of illegal aliens that have crossed the border from 2021 thru 2024.   It is only recently being more enforced because the tide turned on that fiasco and the American people finally woke up.  They are woke some might say but not in the way it is usually used. 

mspart

[Wrestleknownothing]

6 minutes ago, mspart said:

Hence we have millions of illegal aliens that have crossed the border from 2021 thru 2024.   It is only recently being more enforced because the tide turned on that fiasco and the American people finally woke up.  They are woke some might say but not in the way it is usually used. 

mspart

You are changing the subject. If you want tl debate a different thing, fine. But I am talking about the original topic.

[mspart]

The original topic is the Deportation Bill.   You said we already have laws.   True, but not being enforced.   I just gave you a reason why it might be  necessary to have a new Deportation Law (the current4 bill and topic of this thread) and you say I am changing the subject.   Perhaps I'm changing what you want to talk about but I am perfectly on topic. 

mspart