Jump to content

If #9 seed Starocci wins it all, he must get OW, right?


Recommended Posts

Given that he will have beaten so many higher seeds (by seeds he will have to beat the 8 Kemp, 1 Lewis, 4 Griffith and 2 Devos), including two former NCAA champs AND been one of the lowest seeds to win a NCAA title?  How can that not be a shoe in for OW, if it happens this way?  It would be a true underdog story!

Edited by Jimmy Cinnabon
  • Poopy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Jimmy Cinnabon changed the title to If #9 seed Starocci wins it all, he must get OW, right?
31 minutes ago, RandolphTJones said:

If either MM or O'Toole win 165 & finish the season undefeated and don't get OW id be flabbergasted. 

165 is the Premier weight this year. All the top wrestlers are healthy and ready for battle. The winner should get outstanding wrestler award.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

I think Keegan/MM winning that weight would outdo him or Trent beating brooks.

agreed. 197 in general not a very deep weight. 174 is not that deep and some of the top guys are not 100 percent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ionel said:

Not even close to lowest seed to win.  

OK, in the spirit of @cowcards and his daily trivia, 24 unseeded wrestlers have won an NCAA title, but the lowest seeded wrestler to win was a #13 seed. Can you name that wrestler?

There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, in the spirit of [mention=16]cowcards[/mention] and his daily trivia, 24 unseeded wrestlers have won an NCAA title, but the lowest seeded wrestler to win was a #13 seed. Can you name that wrestler?
There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them.
Cody Brewer was the 13 seed. And he dominated his way through the bracket. He should have been seeded much higher, though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think MM would have to absolutely dominate his half of the bracket, which he is capable of doing (and then beat O'Toole, of course), to have a chance at OW. Reluctantly agreeing with JC that Starocci's path is actually set up for an OW run with two former champs in the way. O'Toole's path is difficult enough to compete with that depending on who is more... outstanding...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Crotalus said:
29 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:
OK, in the spirit of [mention=16]cowcards[/mention] and his daily trivia, 24 unseeded wrestlers have won an NCAA title, but the lowest seeded wrestler to win was a #13 seed. Can you name that wrestler?
There has also been one #10, one #11, and one #12. Bonus points if you can name them.

Cody Brewer was the 13 seed. And he dominated his way through the bracket. He should have been seeded much higher, though.

Well done.

  • Bob 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Given that he will have beaten so many higher seeds (by seeds he will have to beat the 8 Kemp, 1 Lewis, 4 Griffith and 2 Devos), including two former NCAA champs AND been one of the lowest seeds to win a NCAA title?  How can that not be a shoe in for OW, if it happens this way?  It would be a true underdog story!

Wrong.  Next stupid question.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ionel said:

Not even close to lowest seed to win.  

I still think if the 9 seed wins they are the OW unless a lower seed wins it all this year. If Carter wins he has to be OW in this scenario.

Edited by JimmyCinnabon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...