Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How well will the decision hold up in appeal?   If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great.    She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. 

If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen.   If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. 

If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened.   Period. 

mspart

  • Fire 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, mspart said:

How well will the decision hold up in appeal?   If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great.    She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. 

If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen.   If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. 

If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened.   Period. 

mspart

This was the defamation suit, not the assault suit. It can be so hard to keep Trump's legal actions straight.

  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
11 minutes ago, mspart said:

How well will the decision hold up in appeal?   If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great.    She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. 

If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen.   If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. 

If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened.   Period. 

mspart

It is a shame that there isn't some sort of time limit that you can bring up these types  of lawsuits. Maybe give the victim 2 weeks . This way the police could actually investigate and do their job. Was this like 25 years ago. 

  • Clown 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, mspart said:

How well will the decision hold up in appeal?   If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great.    She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. 

If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen.   If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. 

If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened.   Period. 

mspart

It’s been in front of judges a whole, whole lot. Honest question, at what point do you stop and think, maybe the judges in the cases have better information about the whole case than the information I get from media? 
 

Also at what point to you stop and realize, I in fact do not know how every person on the planet’s mind works in response to a traumatic event. 
 

Honest questions not meant for argument. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

It is a shame that there isn't some sort of time limit that you can bring up these types  of lawsuits. Maybe give the victim 2 weeks . This way the police could actually investigate and do their job. Was this like 25 years ago. 

It’s nice to see you have such a big heart for the victims of sexual assault. To be so kind to give them a whole two weeks. I mean, that’s an ENTIRE pay period for some people. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

It’s been in front of judges a whole, whole lot. Honest question, at what point do you stop and think, maybe the judges in the cases have better information about the whole case than the information I get from media? 
 

Also at what point to you stop and realize, I in fact do not know how every person on the planet’s mind works in response to a traumatic event. 
 

Honest questions not meant for argument. 

True.  We may not know much about the case other than she can't remember when it happened and that is the root of both cases. 

mspart

Posted
6 minutes ago, mspart said:

True.  We may not know much about the case other than she can't remember when it happened and that is the root of both cases. 

mspart

Or….maybe that’s all we want to remember if it fits what we want. 
 

I guess if you were interested enough, you could look up the public records to find out why judgement after judgement has went against him.  The ‘we may not know’ part is exclusive to those who don’t want to know.
 

Or, you can stick with what you like hearing from the media. That is much easier after all. 

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

It’s nice to see you have such a big heart for the victims of sexual assault. To be so kind to give them a whole two weeks. I mean, that’s an ENTIRE pay period for some people. 

Why didn't she report it the day it happened if it really  happened? You have Clarence Thomas who  had a high tech lynching. You have Brett Kavanaugh accused of rape and the women could not remember where it happened. These things get old.

Edited by Paul158
missed a word
  • Fire 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Why didn't she report it the day it happened if it really  happened? You have Clarence Thomas who  had a high tech lynching. You have Brett Kavanaugh accused of rape and the women could not remember where it happened. These things get old.

Perhaps read up on the effects of sexual assault to understand why two weeks is unrealistic, never mind the same day.

https://www.rainn.org/effects-sexual-violence

 

  • Fire 2

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
20 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Perhaps read up on the effects of sexual assault to understand why two weeks is unrealistic, never mind the same day.

https://www.rainn.org/effects-sexual-violence

 

Just seems a little opportunistic to me. I guess I raised my 4 daughters a little differently. I have 9 granddaughters and all of them will know exactly what to do.

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Just seems a little opportunistic to me. I guess I raised my 4 daughters a little differently. I have 9 granddaughters and all of them will know exactly what to do.

Imagine bringing your daughters and granddaughters into this, and then acting as if having them makes you any kind of enlightened authority whatsoever on how someone you don’t know at all would or should respond to a traumatic experience

  • Fire 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Paul158 said:

Why didn't she report it the day it happened if it really  happened? You have Clarence Thomas who  had a high tech lynching. You have Brett Kavanaugh accused of rape and the women could not remember where it happened. These things get old.

I can’t provide anything as to why she responded how or when she did.  I am not her; nor have you ever been sexually assaulted.  Even if I have been; my response would have no relative connection to what someone else’s response would be.  Nor would I think I was in any position to say what their response should be.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I can’t provide anything as to why she responded how or when she did.  I am not her; nor have you ever been sexually assaulted.  Even if I have been; my response would have no relative connection to what someone else’s response would be.  Nor would I think I was in any position to say what their response should be.  

I'm sorry I just don't agree with you. I will let it go at that. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

I'm sorry I just don't agree with you. I will let it go at that. 

The beauty of it is whether or not we agree is completely irrelevant. What is relevant is 83 million dollars. And the donation site is live!!

Posted
Imagine bringing your daughters and granddaughters into this, and then acting as if having them makes you any kind of enlightened authority whatsoever on how someone you don’t know at all would or should respond to a traumatic experience

A phrase we use in my line of work:

“Everyone wants to be a gangster until it’s time to do gangster shit.”

No one knows how they will react in a horrible situation until it happens.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Fire 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The beauty of it is whether or not we agree is completely irrelevant. What is relevant is 83 million dollars. And the donation site is live!!

ok. you win. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, headshuck said:

She’s a nut case and everyone knows it.

I mean she did win 83 million from a jury so if she's crazy this isn't an example of it. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, billyhoyle said:

I mean she did win 83 million from a jury so if she's crazy this isn't an example of it. 

right because no rich people are nut bags. 

  • Confused 1

TBD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...