WrestlingRasta Posted January 26 Posted January 26 To fundraise 83.3 million dollars from the flock??
headshuck Posted January 26 Posted January 26 Imagine how many women will be lawyering up come Monday? 1
mspart Posted January 27 Posted January 27 How well will the decision hold up in appeal? If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great. She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen. If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened. Period. mspart 1
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 27 Posted January 27 13 minutes ago, mspart said: How well will the decision hold up in appeal? If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great. She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen. If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened. Period. mspart This was the defamation suit, not the assault suit. It can be so hard to keep Trump's legal actions straight. 1 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge
Paul158 Posted January 27 Posted January 27 11 minutes ago, mspart said: How well will the decision hold up in appeal? If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great. She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen. If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened. Period. mspart It is a shame that there isn't some sort of time limit that you can bring up these types of lawsuits. Maybe give the victim 2 weeks . This way the police could actually investigate and do their job. Was this like 25 years ago. 1
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 14 minutes ago, mspart said: How well will the decision hold up in appeal? If she can't remember the year she says this assault happened, I'm not inclined to think her chances are great. She got by this time, an appellate court might actually look at the thing. If I was a judge and someone came to me with a lawsuit saying Trump assaulted her, I would ask, when did this happen. If the answer is I'm unclear on when it happened but by golly it did happen, I would throw it out as frivolous or something. If you are assaulted, you would know what year it happened. Period. mspart It’s been in front of judges a whole, whole lot. Honest question, at what point do you stop and think, maybe the judges in the cases have better information about the whole case than the information I get from media? Also at what point to you stop and realize, I in fact do not know how every person on the planet’s mind works in response to a traumatic event. Honest questions not meant for argument.
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 1 minute ago, Paul158 said: It is a shame that there isn't some sort of time limit that you can bring up these types of lawsuits. Maybe give the victim 2 weeks . This way the police could actually investigate and do their job. Was this like 25 years ago. It’s nice to see you have such a big heart for the victims of sexual assault. To be so kind to give them a whole two weeks. I mean, that’s an ENTIRE pay period for some people. 1
mspart Posted January 27 Posted January 27 3 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: It’s been in front of judges a whole, whole lot. Honest question, at what point do you stop and think, maybe the judges in the cases have better information about the whole case than the information I get from media? Also at what point to you stop and realize, I in fact do not know how every person on the planet’s mind works in response to a traumatic event. Honest questions not meant for argument. True. We may not know much about the case other than she can't remember when it happened and that is the root of both cases. mspart
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 6 minutes ago, mspart said: True. We may not know much about the case other than she can't remember when it happened and that is the root of both cases. mspart Or….maybe that’s all we want to remember if it fits what we want. I guess if you were interested enough, you could look up the public records to find out why judgement after judgement has went against him. The ‘we may not know’ part is exclusive to those who don’t want to know. Or, you can stick with what you like hearing from the media. That is much easier after all.
Paul158 Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 17 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: It’s nice to see you have such a big heart for the victims of sexual assault. To be so kind to give them a whole two weeks. I mean, that’s an ENTIRE pay period for some people. Why didn't she report it the day it happened if it really happened? You have Clarence Thomas who had a high tech lynching. You have Brett Kavanaugh accused of rape and the women could not remember where it happened. These things get old. Edited January 27 by Paul158 missed a word 1 1
Wrestleknownothing Posted January 27 Posted January 27 52 minutes ago, Paul158 said: Why didn't she report it the day it happened if it really happened? You have Clarence Thomas who had a high tech lynching. You have Brett Kavanaugh accused of rape and the women could not remember where it happened. These things get old. Perhaps read up on the effects of sexual assault to understand why two weeks is unrealistic, never mind the same day. https://www.rainn.org/effects-sexual-violence 2 Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge
Paul158 Posted January 27 Posted January 27 20 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said: Perhaps read up on the effects of sexual assault to understand why two weeks is unrealistic, never mind the same day. https://www.rainn.org/effects-sexual-violence Just seems a little opportunistic to me. I guess I raised my 4 daughters a little differently. I have 9 granddaughters and all of them will know exactly what to do. 1
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 22 minutes ago, Paul158 said: Just seems a little opportunistic to me. I guess I raised my 4 daughters a little differently. I have 9 granddaughters and all of them will know exactly what to do. Imagine bringing your daughters and granddaughters into this, and then acting as if having them makes you any kind of enlightened authority whatsoever on how someone you don’t know at all would or should respond to a traumatic experience 1
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 1 hour ago, Paul158 said: Why didn't she report it the day it happened if it really happened? You have Clarence Thomas who had a high tech lynching. You have Brett Kavanaugh accused of rape and the women could not remember where it happened. These things get old. I can’t provide anything as to why she responded how or when she did. I am not her; nor have you ever been sexually assaulted. Even if I have been; my response would have no relative connection to what someone else’s response would be. Nor would I think I was in any position to say what their response should be.
Paul158 Posted January 27 Posted January 27 7 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: I can’t provide anything as to why she responded how or when she did. I am not her; nor have you ever been sexually assaulted. Even if I have been; my response would have no relative connection to what someone else’s response would be. Nor would I think I was in any position to say what their response should be. I'm sorry I just don't agree with you. I will let it go at that. 1
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 19 minutes ago, Paul158 said: I'm sorry I just don't agree with you. I will let it go at that. The beauty of it is whether or not we agree is completely irrelevant. What is relevant is 83 million dollars. And the donation site is live!!
Le duke Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Imagine bringing your daughters and granddaughters into this, and then acting as if having them makes you any kind of enlightened authority whatsoever on how someone you don’t know at all would or should respond to a traumatic experienceA phrase we use in my line of work:“Everyone wants to be a gangster until it’s time to do gangster shit.”No one knows how they will react in a horrible situation until it happens. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Paul158 Posted January 27 Posted January 27 6 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: The beauty of it is whether or not we agree is completely irrelevant. What is relevant is 83 million dollars. And the donation site is live!! ok. you win. 1
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 25 minutes ago, headshuck said: She’s a nut case and everyone knows it. That could very well be true. And, two things can be true at once.
billyhoyle Posted January 27 Posted January 27 33 minutes ago, headshuck said: She’s a nut case and everyone knows it. I mean she did win 83 million from a jury so if she's crazy this isn't an example of it.
WrestlingRasta Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 I wonder how Habba feels tonight after being brow beaten, because she couldn’t distinguish the jury panel from “The Five”
Husker_Du Posted January 27 Posted January 27 11 minutes ago, billyhoyle said: I mean she did win 83 million from a jury so if she's crazy this isn't an example of it. right because no rich people are nut bags. 1 TBD
Charlie Scanlan Bethlehem Catholic, Pennsylvania Class of 2025 Committed to Columbia Projected Weight: 157
Paris Kelleher Princeton, Texas Class of 2025 Committed to Central Methodist (Women) Projected Weight: 145
Megan Preston Wiregrass Ranch, Florida Class of 2025 Committed to Tiffin (Women) Projected Weight: 160, 180
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now