TNwrestling Posted December 19, 2024 Posted December 19, 2024 I'm not sure how anyone could argue against adding a weight class between 97 and 285. Club teams have a 235 weight class. It just makes sense adding one there.
1032004 Posted December 19, 2024 Posted December 19, 2024 28 minutes ago, TNwrestling said: I'm not sure how anyone could argue against adding a weight class between 97 and 285. Club teams have a 235 weight class. It just makes sense adding one there. 11 weights? I’m in! 1
nhs67 Posted December 19, 2024 Posted December 19, 2024 1 hour ago, 1032004 said: 11 weights? I’m in! Now I think we could all agree that 11 > 10 in that scenario. NCWA actually has a 235lb weight class (currently), IIRC. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
nhs67 Posted December 19, 2024 Posted December 19, 2024 Ragusin appears out for the season due to injury. That upsets me. 1 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
1032004 Posted December 19, 2024 Posted December 19, 2024 2 hours ago, nhs67 said: Now I think we could all agree that 11 > 10 in that scenario. NCWA actually has a 235lb weight class (currently), IIRC. In addition to the other 10?
nhs67 Posted December 19, 2024 Posted December 19, 2024 1 minute ago, 1032004 said: In addition to the other 10? Yes, they have 11 weight classes. "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
flyingcement Posted December 21, 2024 Author Posted December 21, 2024 Andrew Blackburn-Forst by fall over Michael Wolfgram 1
scourge165 Posted December 22, 2024 Posted December 22, 2024 On 12/19/2024 at 8:34 AM, TNwrestling said: I'm not sure how anyone could argue against adding a weight class between 97 and 285. Club teams have a 235 weight class. It just makes sense adding one there. I'd be more in favor of spreading them out a bit rather than adding one. Maybe start after '41. 149-152 157-163 165-174 174-190 184-205 There just arent' enough really good big guys to have a 235 and a 285. Or a 235 and even a 300-HWT(though that would make it easier for guys LIKE Dilian Johnson or Nash to Wrestle and play FB.
Gantry Posted December 22, 2024 Posted December 22, 2024 I still think the simplest (and admittedly not perfect) solution is to just 197 to 205. Easy to implement and an improvement. Could also go 165, 175, 185, 205 and 285 for round numbers sake. Easy adjustment in either case.
nhs67 Posted December 22, 2024 Posted December 22, 2024 Davis over Bailey and Barr over Little in thr Penn State-LRA dual. 1 "I know actually nothing. It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me
MNRodent Posted Sunday at 07:48 PM Posted Sunday at 07:48 PM UR Sam Cartella, Northwestern over #11 Kannon Webster, Ill 1
Gantry Posted Sunday at 09:51 PM Posted Sunday at 09:51 PM 2 hours ago, MNRodent said: UR Sam Cartella, Northwestern over #11 Kannon Webster, Ill That makes Webster 1-3 in his last 4 matches.
ionel Posted Sunday at 10:02 PM Posted Sunday at 10:02 PM 19 minutes ago, MPhillips said: Trees over the Tigers... Odd cause s can climbs correct? .
wrestlingfan22 Posted Sunday at 10:14 PM Posted Sunday at 10:14 PM 33 minutes ago, MPhillips said: Trees over the Tigers... Panthers over the Trees on Friday. Panthers are the superior big cat?
Gene Mills Fan Posted Monday at 03:27 PM Posted Monday at 03:27 PM On 12/19/2024 at 10:02 AM, 1032004 said: 11 weights? I’m in! On 1/7/2025 at 9:27 PM, 1032004 said: They usually don’t though. Weren’t you just suggesting to change 184/197 to 190/213? I’m on board with that. But we don’t need 197 + another weight before heavyweight. The competition would be extremely watered down change of heart??
1032004 Posted Monday at 03:40 PM Posted Monday at 03:40 PM 10 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said: On 1/7/2025 at 9:27 PM, 1032004 said: They usually don’t though. Weren’t you just suggesting to change 184/197 to 190/213? I’m on board with that. But we don’t need 197 + another weight before heavyweight. The competition would be extremely watered down change of heart?? In a perfect world sure I’d rather 11 weights. But that’s not happening
Gene Mills Fan Posted Monday at 05:03 PM Posted Monday at 05:03 PM 1 hour ago, 1032004 said: In a perfect world sure I’d rather 11 weights. But that’s not happening Dude you spent two days arguing it would water down the talent pool. Now you're saying in a perfect world there would be 11 weights with the 197 included.
1032004 Posted Monday at 05:22 PM Posted Monday at 05:22 PM 18 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said: Dude you spent two days arguing it would water down the talent pool. Now you're saying in a perfect world there would be 11 weights with the 197 included. It would water down the talent pool. But if the NCAA wants to award more medals then I’m all for it. My argument was referring to working within the confines of 10 weights.
MPhillips Posted Monday at 06:23 PM Posted Monday at 06:23 PM FFS boys! This isn't an upset.. Wasn't there like seven pages of this on another thread? 1 2 .
Natalie Klavetter Hudson, Wisconsin Class of 2025 Committed to North Central (Women) Projected Weight: 138
Taylor Dawson Collinsville, Illinois Class of 2025 Committed to Lindenwood (Women) Projected Weight: 145
Taylin Silco Lubbock Cooper, Texas Class of 2025 Committed to Wayland Baptist (Women) Projected Weight: 138
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now