Bigbrog Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 4 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said: You guys are all worked up because I made a corollary point about sources? Yeah because you post some of the exact same type of sources...ALL THE TIME!! And you don't address the actual issue and make it into a source issue...can't make this stuff up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Bigbrog said: Yeah because you post some of the exact same type of sources...ALL THE TIME!! And you don't address the actual issue and make it into a source issue...can't make this stuff up. Show me where I've posted sources (ALL THE TIME!! ) that have historically bad ratings about telling the truth. Are you saying I'm obligated to post here the way you want me to? Edited March 28 by Mike Parrish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJB Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 1 hour ago, Bigbrog said: Wow...so disingenuous from some of you and quite sad really. You are focusing on freaking sources and tip toeing around addressing what was actually said...and even trying to downplay it by saying "Killing is the thing that is illegal". Wow...some of you continue to show your disgusting bipartisan thought process. There should have been no other response except this guy is disgusting and shouldn't be let anywhere near our kids in college. LJB was spot on...do some of you freaking lick windows?? anything other than the bold and you should be ashamed of yourself... seriously... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 14 minutes ago, LJB said: anything other than the bold and you should be ashamed of yourself... seriously... 'Rando professor says something shitty' is something I am expected to comment on? lol You guys have some ground to cover following up with Trump then. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJB Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 4 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said: 'Rando professor says something shitty' is something I am expected to comment on? lol You guys have some ground to cover following up with Trump then. adorable, mike... trump... TRUMP... TRUMP!!!!! TRUUUUUUUUMP!!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mspart Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 (edited) 3 hours ago, Mike Parrish said: If the posted source lies about what the subject of article said, that's kind of a problem, wouldn't you say? It's hard to critique someone's words when the right wing press is flatly lying about what they said. Mike, I'll bite. What did the guy actually say that has been misreported? But here are some more links that you might find more credible. I'm pretty sure this is a thing. https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/wayne-state-professor-suspended-after-making-threatening-social-media-post/ https://www.wfmz.com/news/cnn/northeast/mi-wayne-state-university-professor-suspended/video_f75d18bb-acf1-5751-a266-f2b85ad03195.html https://apnews.com/article/wayne-state-university-professor-suspended-threatening-post-34ac52500b64142bc433755addf56568 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wayne-state-university-suspends-professor-over-social-media-post-allegedly-advocating-violence/ar-AA198UOj https://www.woodtv.com/news/michigan/wayne-state-professor-suspended-for-social-media-post-justifying-murder/ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wayne-state-professor-suspended-for-saying-it-s-admirable-to-kill-right-wing-speakers/ar-AA19blVB mspart Edited March 28 by mspart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 All I was commenting on was the credibility of the initial source. Trying to read more into what I wrote is missing the point I was making. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJB Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 3 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said: All I was commenting on was the credibility of the initial source. Trying to read more into what I wrote is missing the point I was making. exactly... trump... TRUMP... TRUMP!!!!! TRUUUUUUUUMP!!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mspart Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 38 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said: All I was commenting on was the credibility of the initial source. Trying to read more into what I wrote is missing the point I was making. 1. So now that there are other sources saying the same thing, what does that say about the initial source? You still did not answer my question. You said, and I quote: "If the posted source lies about what the subject of article said, that's kind of a problem, wouldn't you say? It's hard to critique someone's words when the right wing press is flatly lying about what they said." 2. What did the guy actually say that has been misreported? There are two questions here. A response to each would be much appreciated. mspart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Luchador Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 (edited) 7 hours ago, Mike Parrish said: You continually post stuff from sources that are found to routinely lie. If you have better sources saying the same thing, why you the source with historically poor veracity. No you continually reject quality news sources because they don't fit your narrative. When I post facts you attack the sources. You never address the issue. Just like you did here. Nothing different. Edited March 28 by El Luchador Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 Just now, El Luchador said: No you continually reject quality news sources because they don't fit your narrative. When I post facts you attack the sources. You never address the issue. Just like you did here. Nothing different. lolololol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Luchador Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 1 minute ago, Mike Parrish said: lolololol Smugness does mean your right. There's a reason you won't engage on the details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 Just now, El Luchador said: Smugness does mean your right. There's a reason you won't engage on the details. I think you a word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJB Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 4 minutes ago, Mike Parrish said: I think you a word. full disclosure... i chuckled at this more than i probably should have... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mspart Posted March 28 Author Share Posted March 28 Mike, Primary to your assertion that the original source was suspect is that you think they misrepresented what the idiot professor said. I am now asking a third time, what did he say that the original source got wrong? Please note all the other sources I supplied. mspart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Luchador Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 1 hour ago, LJB said: full disclosure... i chuckled at this more than i probably should have... I couldn't figure it out at first, do suppose Mike couldn't figure out what I was saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJB Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 11 minutes ago, El Luchador said: I couldn't figure it out at first, do suppose Mike couldn't figure out what I was saying? mike is above average intelligence, but, with the politics of a 13 year old white girl from the south side... he got it... he was just being a prick... and i laughed and felt a little bad about it... but... anything is worth it for a joke... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Parrish Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 3 hours ago, LJB said: mike is above average intelligence, but, with the politics of a 13 year old white girl from the south side... he got it... he was just being a prick... and i laughed and felt a little bad about it... but... anything is worth it for a joke... Prick? That was gentle ribbing about a typo. You guys sure are snowflakes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreatWhiteNorth Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 15 hours ago, El Luchador said: Would you like a few more sources? There are never any shortages of internet sources that will back whatever you want to believe. Seeking them out is a waste of time, and potentially harmful. 15 hours ago, El Luchador said: And this is why I reject arguments from anyone willing to go outside their safe space. Outside "safe space" on the internet? That is ill-advised. Much better advice would be - "If it isn't a trusted web site, don't go there." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plasmodium Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 Guy should be disciplined by Farcebook not Wayne State. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreatWhiteNorth Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 10 hours ago, mspart said: Mike, I'll bite. What did the guy actually say that has been misreported? But here are some more links that you might find more credible. I'm pretty sure this is a thing. https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/news/wayne-state-professor-suspended-after-making-threatening-social-media-post/ https://www.wfmz.com/news/cnn/northeast/mi-wayne-state-university-professor-suspended/video_f75d18bb-acf1-5751-a266-f2b85ad03195.html https://apnews.com/article/wayne-state-university-professor-suspended-threatening-post-34ac52500b64142bc433755addf56568 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wayne-state-university-suspends-professor-over-social-media-post-allegedly-advocating-violence/ar-AA198UOj https://www.woodtv.com/news/michigan/wayne-state-professor-suspended-for-social-media-post-justifying-murder/ https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/wayne-state-professor-suspended-for-saying-it-s-admirable-to-kill-right-wing-speakers/ar-AA19blVB mspart Art, I realize this wasn't directed at me - but I do have a couple things to add. I can't imagine taking the time to scour through so many sites in order to identify the inconsistencies between the legitimate ones and the illegitimate ones. And then trying to make sense out of the whole mess. Liars have learned how to hide - weeding them out isn't a quick or simple task. And even if we attempt to do this today, there'll be more tomorrow, they multiply. Bad guys monitor the stuff that is being read, and if it is popular - they continue to push it through other BS sites. It's what they do, they play us, and they get paid well to do it. I strictly recommend that everyone consider the web site you intend to view before visiting it. And if you find yourself at a site you aren't familiar with, then close out. Trying to judge what illegitimate sites have to offer is dangerous (potential infection of virus, malware, ransomware, etc.) and a tremendous waste of time. Simply best to avoid them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Luchador Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 7 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said: There are never any shortages of internet sources that will back whatever you want to believe. Seeking them out is a waste of time, and potentially harmful. Outside "safe space" on the internet? That is ill-advised. Much better advice would be - "If it isn't a trusted web site, don't go there." Are you still trying to say it is fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbrog Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 8 hours ago, Plasmodium said: Guy should be disciplined by Farcebook not Wayne State. Wow...SMH... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbrog Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 14 hours ago, El Luchador said: Smugness does mean your right. There's a reason you won't engage on the details. This is so his MO isn't it...once he gets pushback on one of his illogical posts...he deflects, deflects and deflects. He won't engage in any meaningful conversation at that point. I agree with what LJB said, he seems like a halfway intelligent guy except he has teenage level political viewpoints (no logic, all emotion)...AND, he loves stirring the turd and calling people names...I know he does it on purpose and probably sits back and giggles to himself while snapping his gum and twirling his hair, and sometimes I get caught up in it, but I eventually realize that is his schtick when he knows he can't argue his point any longer so I disengage...oh and his other schtick of turning every topic to be about Trump and then posting stupid links about Trump and Elon ad nauseum. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quinlan Morgan Mounds View, Minnesota Class of 2024 Committed to South Dakota State Projected Weight: 197, 285
Dominic Heim Eden Prairie, Minnesota Class of 2024 Committed to Northern Illinois Projected Weight: 285
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now