Now Nazi tattoos are cool

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Why are you and your ilk going out of your way ton defend a literal Nazi who liked Nazism so much he got it tattooed to his man breasts?

Not to mention he has some other significant character flaws...

It’s solely because he is running against someone with a R at the back of their name… which I had to google cause I didn’t know 

Edited June 2 by Caveira

[1032004]

21 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

How you know it was a Nazi tattoos:

If it wasn't, it wouldn't have been covered up.  He would just show it to people and say "no it is just a really ugly skull tattoo I got back in the day."

Instead, he covered up the evidence and hoped it wouldn't get to this point.

"But he's more of a communist now, not a Nazi." I would argue that being a Nazi at any point in his life is the type of decision that should make him absolutely unqualified for public office.  Someone who makes a bad decision of that magnitude can't be trusted to make our nations laws.  Find another job.

He covered it up because he got backlash about it, that doesn’t mean he thinks it was an actual Nazi tattoo.  He says he’s been shirtless around Jewish extended family and passed multiple military tattoo screenings.

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

He covered it up because he got backlash about it, that doesn’t mean he thinks it was an actual Nazi tattoo.  He says he’s been shirtless around Jewish extended family and passed multiple military tattoo screenings.

If there is nothing to hide, why cover it?

[1032004]

12 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

If there is nothing to hide, why cover it?

Because he’s a lib that doesn’t want to offend people even if he doesn’t think they should be offended 

[Caveira]

On 5/11/2026 at 7:45 AM, 1032004 said:

terrorists claiming to be journalists

 

[1032004]

5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

1) I’ve acknowledged that some terrorists posed as journalists.  But they all didn’t, including numerous well known ones who were specifically threatened and targeted for their journalism.

2) Who even is this and do we know this isn’t photoshopped?  Keep in mind the IDF quite literally admitting to photoshopping a photo of a journalist they claimed was a terrorist

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

1) I’ve acknowledged that some terrorists posed as journalists.  But they all didn’t, including numerous well known ones who were specifically threatened and targeted for their journalism.

2) Who even is this and do we know this isn’t photoshopped?  Keep in mind the IDF quite literally admitting to photoshopping a photo of a journalist they claimed was a terrorist

 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Because he’s a lib that doesn’t want to offend people even if he doesn’t think they should be offended 

Now this guy is worried about offending people?  Nothing in his history says that- in fact, he seems to out of his way to offend, at least before he filed his papers.

Is he what your generation would call an "edge lord?"

[jross]

What has Platner accomplished that warrants trading off the bad parts we know about?  I don't see the emotional OR the transactional case to support him.  Is this a "Not Collins" play?  Is there nobody to compete with Platner to go against Collins?    

[1032004]

1 hour ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Now this guy is worried about offending people?  Nothing in his history says that- in fact, he seems to out of his way to offend, at least before he filed his papers.

Is he what your generation would call an "edge lord?"

I think there’s a difference between fellow sh1tposters on Reddit and the real life general population.  But yes, even publicly now he doesn’t seem to mind offending people that he doesn’t like.   

[Caveira]

8 minutes ago, jross said:

What has Platner accomplished that warrants trading off the bad parts we know about?  I don't see the emotional OR the transactional case to support him.  Is this a "Not Collins" play?  Is there nobody to compete with Platner to go against Collins?    

They won’t say it’s a not Collins play…. But it is 

[1032004]

33 minutes ago, jross said:

What has Platner accomplished that warrants trading off the bad parts we know about?  I don't see the emotional OR the transactional case to support him.  Is this a "Not Collins" play?  Is there nobody to compete with Platner to go against Collins?    

I don’t think it’s as much “not Collins” as “an outsider that’s not part of the establishment” so I think that’s part of why people like him.  In addition being a veteran and being born and raised in Maine appealed to Maine voters.  He also traveled throughout basically the whole state talking to people directly showing that he cared.

[Bigbrog]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I don’t think it’s as much “not Collins” as “an outsider that’s not part of the establishment” so I think that’s part of why people like him.  In addition being a veteran and being born and raised in Maine appealed to Maine voters.  He also traveled throughout basically the whole state talking to people directly showing that he cared.

So you like him or claim people like him all because of superficial reasons and no actual policy...got it 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

So you like him or claim people like him all because of superficial reasons and no actual policy...got it 

No I think people do also like him because of his policies.  Just not necessarily because of his “accomplishments”

Edited June 2 by 1032004

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

50 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I think there’s a difference between fellow sh1tposters on Reddit and the real life general population.  But yes, even publicly now he doesn’t seem to mind offending people that he doesn’t like.   

So you are hinting that there are some posters on the internet who say stuff to people that they wouldn't say in real life because they know they would be pummelled verbally and/or physically?

[Bigbrog]

12 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No I think people do also like him because of his policies.  Just not necessarily because of his “accomplishments”

So he hasn't accomplished anything...got it. What are his policies that you like?

[Offthemat]

The only sentiment I’ve heard from him is it’s not right that some people are rich and some people are not.  

[1032004]

5 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

So he hasn't accomplished anything...got it. What are his policies that you like?

No more taxpayer money to Israel, no more pointless wars 

[Bigbrog]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

No more taxpayer money to Israel, no more pointless wars 

That's it...got it

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

That's it...got it

Just a sampling.

[Caveira]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No more taxpayer money to Israel, no more pointless wars 

The spot he is running for has zero ability to accomplish this 

[1032004]

12 minutes ago, Caveira said:

The spot he is running for has zero ability to accomplish this 

False

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

False

Congress hasn’t declared war since 1941 ish.  Riddle me how he’s gonna impact that 

[Scouts Honor]

4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Because he’s a lib that doesn’t want to offend people even if he doesn’t think they should be offended 

lol

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Congress hasn’t declared war since 1941 ish.  Riddle me how he’s gonna impact that 

There was a vote last month about weapons purchases by Israel