All Activity

Didn’t see the movie, but I did hear that Trump endorsed breathing.

Possibly be just an email. Bahahahahahahah. You can’t. You just can’t make this shit up.

Cam Steed and Alex Facundo at 174. Jett Strickenberger if he's still doing 133

That’s a typical liberal all right. U Bernie is the leader

Gives Ba’ath party purging vibes. Also pretty ironic that the administration that is so adamant on cutting costs and waste is going to have every officer from all around the world flown to VA to what could probably be just an email. Not to mention all our enemies know all of the brass will be at one time now

Something is happening. mspart

If AOC is fighting at 155 with day before weigh ins, I would bet he walks around 175+. Who knows what Deakin weighs... He looked like a 174 when he wrestled 157 and people said he made the weight easily. Had not heard Amine was considering retirement due to injuries. Great career if true! He is a competitor. I think Zain would be the strong favorite as well. Yianni looked so good before tanking against PJ. Will be interesting to see if getting his heart situation figured out yields different results. Glory probably would get throttled but its a throwback matchup. I agree with the Nolf take if he properly trains. The question is, would he properly train? Probably so. I believe that Sloan is back on the farm but I recently saw an alumni picture of him working out in the room at SDSU. Warner is done trying to pursue MFS world teams but so was Darian Caldwell and Lance Palmer.

Very instructive post. but I have "explain it to me like I'm a 6 year old" bias.

This is why we come here. Thank you Bias...

Figueroa and Romney

Well, this should make RV, UB and others happy...or no?? The suspected reason for the meeting is that Hegseth is going to make like a 20% cut to the top leadership of the military. Hegseth orders hundreds of senior military officers to Virginia for highly unusual meeting | CNN Politics

Ferrari to heavyweight

Well apparently you do....

If these are true...wow...the movie Ideocracy may actually be coming true.

They had a trial for the 125 spot at u23 worlds today. Lotfi lost to Mohamadnejad ( this year's junior world silver) 4- 0.

Well did anyone actually say that the ONLY ultimate qualifier was if it would hold up in court? If no one did, I am not sure I understand the point of your post?

.

Have to say I find interesting, and it's not solely related to this topic but other topics as well, that the ultimate qualifier as to whether or not someone's opinion on available information is logical, or total bias and mental gymnastics, is whether or not that information would hold up in the court of law. But yet, however on the other hand, when courts of law have in fact returned decisions such as felony convictions, findings of fraud, liable for sexual misconduct, etc etc.......that too is just total bias, hoaxes, and witch hunts.

What about these ? https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/3821265/liberal-pregnant-women-pop-tylenol-like-tic-tacs-after-trumps-autism-claim/ https://www.outkick.com/culture/pregnant-liberal-women-guzzling-tylenol-social-media-stick-trump https://www.aol.com/news/anti-trump-tiktok-users-large-182641574.html

This is the item I heard on the radio. She got the call at 4am, this is the one. From the X item: Pregnant liberal took so much Tylenol after hearing Donald Trump say it causes autism she’s now in the ICU and is going to die Executive Director of American Frontline Nurses got a “very frantic call at 4am from a husband whose wife is now dying of liver failure on a ventilator in an ICU, because she was trying to prove that Tylenol doesn't cause autism because of what Trump said” She’s going to die “Whether or not you believe the Harvard study or not is not, not the issue here. The issue is that she's somewhere between 23 to 25 weeks and she overdosed on Tylenol, and she's going to die” I would hope this is a crank. I would hope no one is that stupid. But it is believable because of the overreaction to anything Trump does or says. mspart

Ferrari at HWT will be interesting at a new weight and at a new school.

Access the internet and make your way to google dot com Type the following: TEAM GOES HERE wrestling forum Replace the part that says TEAM GOES HERE with the name of the team you want to find Press enter

Please show where Turley showed conservative idealism in his report that I cited. Then I'll take your critique more seriously. I find his legal explanations are none partisan. They are straightforward and professorial in my opinion. I'll give you some examples: “[Undocumented persons are being] deported without due process. Kavanaugh has said go for it, not constitutional problem.” I am not sure what Professor Klarman was referencing here. However, in cases like A.A.R.P. v. Trump, Justice Kavanaugh joined his colleagues in halting deportations to protect the due process rights of these undocumented persons. It was Justices Alito and Thomas who dissented to allow removal under the Alien Enemies Act. The majority stated that the Administration “erred in dismissing the detainees’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence stating: “The circumstances call for a prompt and final resolution, which likely can be provided only by this Court. At this juncture, I would prefer not to remand to the lower courts and further put off this Court’s final resolution of the critical legal issues. Rather, consistent with the Executive Branch’s request for expedition—and as the detainees themselves urge—I would grant certiorari, order prompt briefing, hold oral argument soon thereafter, and then resolve the legal issues.” In 2025, he did vote with the majority in a 5-4 decision on Venezuelan immigrants. It allowed for deportations to continue in ruling that the challengers erred in not bringing their challenges as habeas corpus claims. However, it also ruled that the alleged gang members need to be given notice of deportation and the opportunity to contest the deportation. Kavanaugh voted in favor of that position. I may be missing what Professor Klarman is referencing but Kavanaugh has repeatedly voted in favor of due process rights, even if it may not be as robust as Professor Klarman might have wanted. There are cases under this and prior administrations allowing for immediate deportations near the border that occur within a certain period of time. I cannot see any decision where he has effectively “said go for it” and deny any due process. 2. “Washington Post fired a journalist who simply reposted words from Charlie Kirk’s mouth” and “[Bezos] just fired a journalist for basically saying something that is true.” Professor Klarman made repeated claims about this controversy. It appears to be a reference to the termination of former Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah. However, it is not true that she was fired for “simply reposting words from Charlie Kirk’s mouth” but for making racially inflammatory comments in direct contravention of both Washington Post policies and prior warnings from her editors. Soon after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Attiah went on to Bluesky to post an attack on him with reference to his race. In one, she declared: “Refusing to tear my clothes and smear ashes on my face in performative mourning for a white man that espoused violence is….not the same as violence.” In a second posting, she wrote, “Part of what keeps America so violent is the insistence that people perform care, empty goodness and absolution for white men who espouse hatred and violence.” Those were the comments cited by the Washington Post for its actions. The Post stated “Your postings on Bluesky (which clearly identifies you as a Post Columnist) about white men in response to the killing of Charlie Kirk do not comply with our policy.” The Post prohibits postings that disparage people based on their race, gender, or other protected characteristics. Sources told the media that Attiah had been confronted multiple times by the paper’s management over her inflammatory social media posts. This includes one in 2020 where she ended up apologizing on social media for erroneously saying that a new French law targeted Muslim children. It is simply not true that the Post fired her for quoting Kirk. Please let us know how this is rooted in politics. In my opinion he is quite factual in his explanations. You may not think so and that would be interesting to hear. There are more examples in his report that you can look at. mspart

Other than the people taking it while pregnant on video?