WrestlingRasta

Is Truly quoting actual full court transcripts, or is this just what Turley is saying on his website?

Can you find an example in history where an ex-President running for President has faced the level of charges/claims, in multiple states by multiple jurisdictions from multiple agencies, having passed through multiple appellate courts, of the individual's appointing,....to qualify this 'same thing' argument. Of course it is not the same thing, because there is absolutley no example whatsoever of the same thing as above to try and compare it to. Just because someone is an ex President running for president does not automatically mean charges and claims are false or nothing more than political motivation. (Again, look at the countless number of republican's, people on his staff, who are involved in some way in all of these many many many claims and charges) If you are all for someone being found guilty if they are guilty, then why don't you wait for the justice system to fully play out and form your opinions, instead of forming them as soon as he has to sit in front of one of his many many many claims and charges, because your news media told you it was political. Because lets be honest, you (I'm going to assume) have not and will not sit in a courtoom for one day of his many many many claims and charges, so the only information you have is from your news media. Which, you have agreed on here several times, is incredibly slanted and bias beyond all trust. But when its convenient or fits....

It is extremely regular to have alternate jurors, you don't have to take a law class to understand that. But......anything to stir the flock, and boy can they get stirrin easily..

While having full expectation that people answer your questions whether they are comfortable with them or not, you are at the same time making the following statement: "If the examples are worth their salt they should stand up to my scrutiny." Indicating yourself as the ultimate authority on whether or not a question/example in a dialogue is worthy. By doing this, you make it very easy to dodge questions/examples you may not be comfortable answering, all while expecting others to do just that, by simply claiming it is not worthy of your salt, which is very easy and self fulfilling to do if you don't want to put yourself in the discomfort of a particular question or example.

Careful.

Cannot, in anyway shape or form, agree with this.

So you’re literally putting a call for political violence on social media? Wow, you’re really putting your balls out there, over some ‘media’ headlines. There’s a few people you could ask how that works out in this country…may have to get on a Thursday waiting list though.

I like the notion that our democracy is in peril. Can’t argue with that. Not so sure can agree that it’s all coming from one side of the aisle.

Because by determining the only question worth answering is one that is 'worth their salt by standing up to my scrutiny', makes it real easy to not have to look internal and answer questions yourself simply by dismissing something you're not comfortable answering......all the while accusing the same of others. It's another one of those things interesting in human behavior.

When your lack of ability to comprehend what you are reading, brings out your complete obsession with someone in its most ugliest of forms, and you just can't help but continue to make a fool of yourself. #RentFree

Neither of the two have near enough impact on my life to hate them, just think they’re both worthless, dangerous in their own way, and neither should be anywhere near the presidency.

What I see here is the mentality of someone who just simply cannot think for himself. Well he says this guy is bad bad. And I also think he is bad bad. So this guy must be my leader. And I shall follow his every word. (As if a person can’t think both are worthless pieces of shit) The flock is consistent, if not only clueless. The flock is also very tight in the sphincter.

In all fairness, and it’s not secret around here my opinion of the guy, but saying “we’re going to look at that and put out a policy” is not at all saying we’re going to ban or restrict contraception. The policy could just as well be no ban/restriction, as it could be for bans/restrictions. But he didn’t say one way or the other, nor lean one way or the other. Honestly probably one of the better answers he’s ever given in his career as a politician. Subtle tip: just stick with what the guy actually says. He’s going to give you plenty of ammo. You don’t need to reach.

You may have finally caught on to something. The ability to wonder is a beautiful thing. It opens your eyes, and your perspective, to aspects of the world you never realized existed, and can enrich even the happiest of lives.... The Sense of Wonder | Psychology Today

I wonder if there are any educators amongst our friends here, who would be willing to start a reading comprehension thread, so some of our participants could practice their skills. It seems it could be useful.

You’re not wrong

Just got home from a long weekend in the SW Lake Michigan pocket. Lived in (just north of) that area for a bit before Florida. Nice refresher of how beautiful that part of the country is…

I don’t know what all those new buttons are supposed to mean so…..

Actually, I read one page, and then read the number ‘5’ in that little section that indicates number of pages. We’ve discussed this whole reading comprehension thing before, I hope for your sake you will soon take heed. Enjoy your weekend of happiness (It’s a long weekend, a little practice wouldn’t hurt)

And this, my dear friends, is a perfect representation of how people behave when they are completely “happy” with their life. Five pages worth of sheer happiness.

Nice move on the goal post. I love whenever someone throws out the “we are not a democracy”. None of that answers my question though.

Ahhhhh. So the next question is, are you purposely leaving out the entire series of events leading up to the ‘visits’, or do you just not know enough about the whole of the cases to have any clue what you’re talking about?

So states and feds forcing and denying celebrations the public wants is an okay matter that soldiers didn’t die for? I have a feeling soldiers in the revolutionary army would disagree.

Are you speaking to the entire timeline of events, or just picking out parts of each?

What other very similar situations are you referring to, when considering the entire timeline of events?