The triggering talk is true. And likewise there are a handful of other folks who people get all up in a fuss over, and you know what they were not doing today…..visiting a probation officer. But, but……
(We’re seeing on a few of these threads what happens when you attach your sense of self, and get conned, to a con man.)
I’m not sure that 2.4 to 2.2 equals less action, there could be a lot of other factors in such a small variance….most notably the emphasis this year on allowing for reaction time in neutral. How many times did we see a sequence this past year not result in a takedown, that would have been a clear takedown the year before? And knowing and adjusting to that tends to lead the wrestlers wrestling through situations more, which, creates more action.
(just playing devils advocate)
Completely agree….intelligence officials, members of congress, governors and state legislatures, DOJ officials……across the board.
Again, it boggles my mind that anyone would vote for either one of these clowns, let alone try and defend them.
Dude, when you can pull an Animals reference out of your hat like that, even getting as specific as the three different ones…….winner winner chicken dinner.
Don’t twist my words in your bid to argue at all cost.
I didn’t post the departments justification, or anything of the sort. I posted how it was obtained, and the primary use. Of course it will be used for other things. It is a MUTLI FUNCTIONAL vehicle.
We don't have to always, by any means necessary, find something to bitch about. Especially when it involves very quickly moving off your own topic when you come to the understanding your original topic was in fact nothing to bitch about.
Just saying, it's okay to relax. It's even healthy.
People getting so upset in here and making it obvious they didn't take five minutes to read up on it before responding. The town didn't pay a dollar for the vehicle. It was obtained by a fedreal program on a year to year usage agreement. The number one use for it in that area is high water rescues (look up floods in the area), and use in neighboring communities. It may be in Prosper next year, it may be somewhere else.
It seems, and this comes from friends out there more than anything else, that it's more the California legislature than it is Newsome. Conservative friends who find him much more moderate than the legislature.
I don't doubt this in the slightest, its what we find the sources reliable to that I question.......reliable to accurate information, or reliable to our predetermined biases.
What I know about the trial has nothing to do with media hot takes or what pundits want to make you think.
You’ve been very transparent in your time here, on how you fall in line there. And this never works out well for you.
It’s both. It’s a ‘talking point’ because it has absolutely nothing to do with the facts and evidence that were presented to grand and trial juries. It’s talking points to rub people’s emotions.
Guliani ran on a platform of going after and getting specific criminals. Does his success in that effort make it any more or less….matters of law?