Jump to content

WrestlingRasta

Members
  • Posts

    2,983
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by WrestlingRasta

  1. Come ooooon. You know better. You know it has zero effect on their future usage.
  2. So, when you ‘correct’ them, you believe that your are changing their ways, and that is the last time they will ever use ‘you guys’ again?
  3. That makes no sense. Don’t know if a person is male so automatically give them a female moniker. Combined with you only give names to people you are at issue with. I had kinda assumed it was something to make you feel better about yourself. Bringing in your job again combined with those other two factors helped to confirm. Appreciate ya.
  4. Which leads me to another question: what is it you feel you are accomplishing with the names, ma’am, etc?
  5. I mean, I don’t know about all that storm front or whatever. But…yeah…it is in fact okay to be white. Another question: why do you always feel the need to give us your resume?
  6. That’s my point. The words are meaningless. ‘Saying’ does nothing. It’s the actions.
  7. When I said no one I was referring to people engaging here on this platform. Across the entirety of the United States, I agree ‘no one’ would not be accurate. The rest of the post however is my point. Saying MAGA and truly meaning make America great are not the same thing.
  8. No one is against the idea of making America great again. It’s the perspective of what makes America great that is being challenged. It’s also the idea that just because someone is wearing or hat, or standing at the podium in congress like it’s a stripper pole, belting ‘we are ultra maga” doesn’t mean they are really working to make American great. Then there’s the idea that America is still great, tremendously great. Not perfect but…
  9. I never understood people’s problem with fact checking, other than those are the people that are really much more interested in the narrative than the truth. Can there be any other reason someone would have a problem with other people seeking out to see if something is actually true?
  10. Yeah, that tends to happen a good bit when you’re a congressman. When you need to be elected to maintain your job, public opinion is kind of a ……thing.
  11. I know a congresswoman was attempting to subpoena him while this was going through that process of the related bill, but of course that subpoena was blocked by the committee chair.
  12. I don’t see a court date coming up soon?
  13. Where in the hell did I state, or even imply that? Someone’s frustration with me in another unrelated thread has carried over to a topic I haven’t even opined on Get some rest.
  14. Maybe someone who knows someone else knew had a direct conversation with that someone else, told them, and therefore knew they knew?
  15. I don’t know how good of a tool that is, in a lot of areas where both styles are very popular, internet is not as accessible, nor is the time available to watch YouTube. All that aside, there is going to be a very heavy American skew of the numbers in terms of where the views are coming from.
  16. The information is available. Fair question, what numbers have you seen on an international/world level scale that have had you convinced otherwise?
  17. So what about those numbers at international events that are not world championships. What about numbers at different nations national events. Tournaments specifically not the world championships have been referenced as well. Isn’t that all indicative? Those numbers are available.
  18. My posting of the picture was more for those who are not defending Hamas but being ‘attacked’ (probably poor choice of word here) as if they are.
  19. Unfortunately there are some victims who have directly said yes he absolutely knew.
  20. Just out of curiosity, what would be convincing if overall participation numbers is not?
×
×
  • Create New...