You might want to read the article. Then, here’s this quote: “It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of the past on current society, including critical race theory.” What is your argument against that? Note: they aren’t doing it yet; this is about future instruction. They are using the tortured, conservative-definition of CRT, as opposed to what it actually is, in their position. Tell me: why do you have an issue with teaching accurate history? Is there a problem with saying that slavery was bad? Sure, those people were stolen from their homes, dying by the dozens en route, tortured, raped, mutilated. But they learned skills! Skills that earned them no money! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk