Jump to content

Le duke

Members
  • Posts

    2,961
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Le duke

  1. BBC, Al Jazeera, NYT, WaPo. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. He’ll be the 5th best guy if Gable comes back and if Vito doesn’t take an OLY RS. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. /s is common internet parlance indicating sarcasm. Having worked at USAFA and being friends with several others who work there, I can assure you that the combatives program is a waste of time for an athlete of Wyatt Hendrickson’s caliber. It’s for the average cadet at USAFA, checking a box for combat-ish readiness training. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. So, the Democrat controlled Congress didn’t have a single anti-230 bill make it out of committee in either house. What is the point you are trying to make? But, here is our favorite former wrestler with HIS plan to kill off 230: https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/house-republicans-draft-bill-to-strip-big-tech-companies-of-section-230-protections.amp Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. Wait. So he didn’t clamp down on production through EO, bill signedbjnto law, government agency, etc.? What you said was…wrong? Got it. Like I said. The domestic oil production three month rolling average has increased every month he’s been in office. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. Section 230 lobbyists? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. Clampdown on oil production? Where? How? Industry statistics show a three month rolling average that continually increases. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/crude-oil-production Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. The president can’t end 230 without congress. As we learned in a recent court case, the president doesn’t make the law. Which is why Facebook lobbies Congress hard, on both sides of the aisle, to maintain 230. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. The legal consequences being the end of Section 230 if someone decides to sue them and succeeds. That was pretty clear to me. My commanding officer has legal authority to ask me to do just about anything within the bounds of the law. If I disagree with an order’s legality, I better be ready to back that up with a damn good reason as to why I feel it is illegal. The executive has no power over companies other than enforcement of the law. The government can ASK anyone to moderate their content; they cannot FORCE Facebook to do it. I haven’t seen anything indicating that they were planning to arrest anyone at FB for failure to comply. No hints of developers being arrested, etc. An originalist/textualist reading of this would have to conclude that there is no government-on-person injury here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. I’m sorry, but please tell me you meant to put at /s at the end of this. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. The evidence in the case begins in 2017. It seems absolutely insane that they are suing Biden for the actions of several companies. Particularly when those companies did many of these things when he wasn’t president. Also, the funny thing in the MO AG’s statement is that it uses the word that is the fatal flaw in their case: “ask”. The government didn’t censor anyone; it *asked* social medial platforms to control misinformation, which they did, willingly. I imagine this will get crushed 6-3 at SCOTUS. The entire case is built on non-existent case law. There’s nothing to support this. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Don’t you know? Those are the secret ones the cabal don’t want you to know about. /s Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. Oh. I like it. Let's add different modes of running on the track. The 100m and 200m backwards run. The 100m and 200m skip. The 100m and 200m jumping jack. The 4x100m forwards/backwards/skipping/jumping jack medley.
  14. "That's messed up, man!". -Zain to Berger after being headbutted. I don't get the impression that Zain would be one to lose his cool.
  15. Picture floating around various corners of the internet with Trump and Nauta together today, despite a judge’s order that they not see each other. Yet another charge added to the docket. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. Why would the USGOV harm Twitter in any way? It’s an intel goldmine. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. If I have $1 in my bank account, get paid $10 on Friday, and pay $2 to my student loans on Monday, are we pretending that it didn’t come from the same pool of $11? Really? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. Here’s a bit more: https://theintercept.com/2022/11/09/student-debt-relief-lawsuit-ppp-myra-brown/ A woman who can’t pay off her private loans gets free money for…things…from PPP, for her own home business. That money then goes, sooner or later, towards her student loan payments. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  19. Do what one of the plaintiffs did: Pay off your student loans with a PPP loan for your arts and crafts business you run out of your home. Get $48,000, then get $47,996 of that loan relieved and use $17,000 of it to pay off your private loans to SMU. https://original.newsbreak.com/@kevinjamesshay-1698260/3046310329832-business-group-plaintiff-that-filed-lawsuit-before-scotus-to-block-student-loan-relief-received-ppp-loan-forgiveness Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. SCOTUS has ruled that police have no legal responsibility to protect (and serve) you. Castle Rock vs Gonzalez, 2005. Which is kind of horrific. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  21. Please explain how Missouri had standing here. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  22. This is the way that admissions are moving for a lot of higher end schools. If you're #1 in your class of 50, with a 32 ACT, from a less-than-great school on a New Mexico reservation, you're a more impressive candidate than a kid who is #50 in his class of 500, with a 34, from a wealthy Chicago suburb (everything else being similar).
  23. I thought Nick Lee was listed as going? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  24. The UC system has already demonstrated a way to get a diverse, highly qualified student body. Also, the number of Americans actually impacted by this is very small. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  25. Are we talking about the same Joe Biden who hasn't refused the FBI access to any of his properties or storage facilities? Whose lawyers found documents and voluntarily turned them over to the government? Now, compare that to Trump, who has apparently intentionally and purposefully moved classified documents multiple times after being asked to return them by the federal government. Do you understand the difference between the two situations? One is a mistake, which Biden worked with the feds to correct and make right. Pence? The exact same thing. Worked to make it right. Invited lawyers from the DOJ into his properties. Trump, on the other hand, was asked multiple times to hand over the classified records in question, and not only refused, but moved those records in an attempt to evade the DOJ.
×
×
  • Create New...