Bigbrog

There you go again...you just can't help yourself can you...get off your high horse...you aren't as smart as you think you are...and you certainly don't know what people's emotional states are; all the while calling them names while trying to play it off as "humor"...but hey...you do you...if nothing else it is entertaining

So many things to unpack...why does it have to be about who has money and who doesn't when it comes to a committing a crime?? Should we take into account how much money the victim makes then??? Second thought...no one has addressed the fact that victims are not taking into the consideration of this conversation/debate...why? Third thought is how does a self-prescribed layer on here only worry about what the aledged perpetrators rights are but gives no shitnits about the victim?? Money??? Who pays the bills? Hmmm?? Discuss

So I will say that the little bit I have read up on it, the cashless bail is not meant for the most serious of crime allegations such as murder, assault, deadly weapons, etc. I get the "idea" of "evening the playing field"; but to a point...we are talking about people being accused of a crime in which they had to be arrested and in jail. Think about that. Also, what about looking at it from the victim's stand-point...where are their feelings being taking into consideration?? Do they not mean anything in this equation? Or are they people who have resources?? To me, we should "fix the way we treat victims in our justice system, more emphasis/empathy for the victims then of those who commit crimes.

Funny...that is the first thought I had.

Disagree Could we say AOC is mainstream democrat at this point?

Of course!

What do ya'll think?

No I am agreeing with the idea that MTG is a whackadoodle. But also saying, politicians do disgusting things equally across both parties.

Equally disgusting as what some of the Dem idiots do at fundraisers...or even do on the lawn of the Whitehouse

SO now you are saying that Trump stole the election and was right by saying BIden stole the following election? Or is this somehow your attempt at "humor" again?? I know your "humor" is lost on every single other person on here, but just want to be clear.

So no one got it...including Husker...it's just "humor"....riiiggghhhtttt.....

Serious question Wrestlingknownothing...do you run a company? Smalll? Large? Not meant in any other meaning other than I am truly curious.

Weren't you the one just up on your pulpit in another thread talking about "respect for other people"...yet here you are...once again...insulting people and calling them names because you disagree with their take...typical hypocrite who thinks they are smarter than everyone...you called him a "dum-dum" and a "5 year old"...funny part is YOU are the one who comes off like those things.

LOL...seriously...THIS is your response?? Didn't address anything...why people may ask??!! Because YOU were one of those that tried to argue with me about Covid...and you know for a fact that most of your takes have since been proven false and yet mine to be true. Freaking hilarious that you respond with some crappy a$$ attempt at trying to assume who I am and what my intentions are with my post. You are the one who comes on here with your self righteous virtue signaling every chance you get, while calling people names and assuming you know who they are as a person based on an opinion on an internet forum. And...hey guess what...you aren't as smart as you think you are. And the other funny party of what you wrote is if you knew my posting at all you would know how many many times I have admitted I was wrong and admitted that I have changed my view on things based on back and forth with other posters. Unlike you and a couple others on here you like to insult people when they disagree with you. But hey...keep on keeping on GWN...and being wrong about Covid!

I saw that this morning...crazy!

So why is it that people and businesses are leaving California in droves than...the last two years their population has shrunk?? Because their the state is so rich and they hate all the money?? And why does it have to be a left vs. right thing to acknowledge that the state has some terrible policies and people are leaving that state as fast as they can?

But it's not over Plasi's head? Or Le Dukes?? Got it...

If we could go back and read all the things I said and others disagreed with I would surely like to know where I was incorrect...by all means everything I said was in fact correct and proven true.

Accountability SHOULD happen...but it won't as long as it doesn't serve the person in office any benefit...which it won't for the current one because they bought into all the hype and over-reaction. I would love for all those that argued with me about Covid on the old boards to come on here and admit they were wrong...their were a lot of them!! Covid mandates were one of the most ridiculous, harmful, and shameful things our country ever did...in regards to a virus.

Ugh!!!! So terrible!!

Huh?? How in the hell did you get that from what I wrote?? And the irony of YOU saying "We have reached a new level here. You cannot be helped."...weak AF. How do you say you lost a debate without saying you lost a debate....

Who are the ones that are "hurt" by words?? Pretty sure it isn't Offthemat

Come on Le Duke..get over the partisan crap

Your take is such a partisan one it is almost laughable. You do realize that the reason Suckafornia contributes so much is they are taxed WAY more than say, Florida due to each individual states policies. And the reason for a state to receive funding is vast and should be taken into account when making such statements of "blue states" fund "red states". It is a reach at best to try and make any sort of deduction about "blue" or "red" states from how much federal funding a state gets. Each state would have to be looked at individually as to their balance sheet. It actually would have been fine if you said something like "According to some formula a group of people used, 7 out of 10 states that receive the most federal funding typically vote republican. You can NOT make any sort of comparative to one state versus the other because of it. Heck you can't really make a determination of "good" or "bad" in terms of the individual state depending on how much federal funding it receives. Overall it is a stupid way to look at things and a laughable way to try and divide further.

Once again...very disengenous....come on bob...he was using it as a point not as something to take literal...but you knew that and didn't have any other argument than what you wrote.