Bigbrog

Does it ever get old playing the victim all the time?? Do you ever look at your own behavior that causes people to react the way they do towards you? By chance do you know what a narcissist is??

I'm not confusing anything...I think you are. I literally asked what the end goal was of the thought process of giving people "support" so that everyone starts at the same starting line? If you say it isn't so that people have equal outcomes than what is the reason?

Ummm...what?!?! You say she literally said the exact opposite than in the very next sentence you say she said exact what I wrote. If poor people need more support than rich people...why do they need that support other than to give them the same starting point as others who don't need said support?? Did you even read my post or just instantly jump into argue mode??

Why are one person's needs met by their own doing and the other person's needs are met by receiving something they didn't work for? Don't you think those are the questions that should be asked and answered?? That will truly get to the exact reason why there will never be true equality in this world. There will always be people that will be smarter and work harder than others, by choice. So no matter how they start, at equal spots or not, there are going to be people that have more than others based on work ethic, intelligence, drive, etc. Sorry...but there are people out there that are not willing to do the same work and put forth the same effort as others...and guess what...that is okay.

So UB, Kamala, and others, truly think every single person born, regardless of the situation they were born into, should be given the exact same resources and opportunities?? Seriously?!?! How crazy and asinine of thinking is that! If equity of outcome isn't the end goal of that thought process, what is the end goal??

And yet crickets from the likes of UB, RL/TPT and its other personalities.

Mic drop

LOL...what do you think the answer is?? By the way...Humas is still responsible for this war

Man you are exhausting...I am not in the argument about what is moral or not moral when it comes to abortion...I have repeatedly said that...abortion is WAY to much of a complicated subject that I choose to withhold my overall opinion on it as it could probably change hour by hour. You asked my why I choose the "line" of life starts at a heartbeat...period!

Lol...I totally agree...not sure why I choose to wade in it on this thread

Yes I do...because 99% of your opinions are completely crazy. I draw the line at heart beat as that is one of the critical biological functions of humans. The other reason I say it is the beating heart and not, let's say the brain, is because humans can still be alive even if their brain isn't functioning (I am not getting into a moral debate about being brain dead here)...people can not be alive if their heart is not beating. You can call it whatever you want...a line or arbitrary line all you want, it is the distinction I make when thinking of a human being a living thing. It has nothing to do a moral distinction of anything other then when I think life begins. So nice try but you can't twist/extrapolate/confuse it with making any sort of comment about abortion.

Please tell me that was just a bad attempt at humor!!!???

OMG...LOL!!!! You literally just did it when I ask you why you do it...how in the world did you come to the conclusion I am whining???

Hey dum dum...that is the moral argument...aka, when does life actually start....it is an argument that the scientific and medical field struggle with all the time. I personally think the fetus is a living thing once the heart starts beating...but that is my personal opinion based on my scientific training and education...again, it is not an indication of my stance on abortion but rather an opinion on the moral debate of when life actually starts.

So you just want to argue...got it. If you honestly think I, or anyone is saying that than you have the mental capability of a gnat.

Wow are you a true whackadoodle...are you seriously trying to lecture on what happens to a woman's body during pregnancy?? LOL By the way you have no idea what my stance even is on the whole abortion thing...I was merely pointing out where, once again, you try and turn something someone said into something they didn't say. Why do you constantly do that???

Where is @PortaJohn when you need him??

Pretty sure you are the only one calling it a punishment. Living with the consequences and taking responsibility for actions isn't punishment, but rather an important attribute to be a value add to society.

I personally agree with the flag burning thing...and quite frankly that isn't that crazy of an idea. And really isn't too controversial. It'll never happen unfortunately because of the first amendment, but I bet there are ways around it such as charging these morons with causing damage to public property, or starting a fire in an unauthorized area, hence not protected by the first amendment. The whole police immunity thing is a little weird...especially when I tried to look it up and there really wasn't much converge about it other than liberal rags...not to mention I can't find the full video of him saying it other than snippets. IF he truly meant full immunity from criminal prosecution than I disagree with him on that...however, if it is for financial liability, police are already protected from that. I personally would like to see more support given to police as the VAST majority are amazing people and an amazing job....too bad we let the media drive perception of a whole profession because the terrible/horrible cops (which is the minuscule minority) get all the attention and are glorified to villainize the rest. Bottom line, which is no surprise, we have drastically different definitions of "crazy" and "SCARY!!!".

Man you are dense...if they aren't supposed to be doing those things and IF they are in fact doing them, they should be held accountable....PERIOD!! What part of that don't you get?? How is me saying that so "controversial"?? Or do you just want to argue to argue...if so, at least just admit it.

That isn't a conspiracy...they all have literally admitted it...LOL

Not a Trump fan but would love to hear what remarks you think are "getting crazier and crazier"?? I am serious...I would love to hear them, or at least hear which statements YOU think are crazy. I have a feeling if Trump said the sky is blue you would play the mental gymnastics in your brain to make it "crazy" in your mind. And if you could, describe where you don't like his judgment on things...give specific examples?

So people (on all sides of the political spectrum) came out and complained that google wasn't filling in with predictive search options for Trump assassination attempt, google said yeah, our bad we have an outdated algorithm, and your take away is above?? Literally makes me laugh out loud. There wasn't a conspiracy theory, nor knowledge gaps being filled with the craziest idea possible...get a grip.

That is what you got out of my post?? LOL Seriously, take the terrorist loving sunglasses off.

What makes this a conspiracy theory?? Google actually came out and admitted they needed to update their algorithm for predictive search recommendations. And pretty sure "right-wing" people were not the only ones googling Trump Assassination attempt. So yes, your post is a joke.