Lipdrag

Don’t they need ID to deal Blackjack at the casino?

I wondered whatever happened to Pippi Longstocking.

A democratic election process to select a candidate to run for office which is ignored with impunity by democrats.

Haven’t been to jail. Thank you for the insider knowledge.

Right! Where do these geniuses think Barney the T-Rex got the carbon? Did he have a carbon generator hidden under his really short arms? The carbon was already here! Barney was simply recycling: taking carbon lying - or floating - around and using it then putting it back. Carbon fuel is organic for goodness sake.

"Much of this money can be saved simply by not being spent", Fisher said. “The Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office is sitting on big piles of money,” “The government is throwing massive sums around, but the devil is in the details,” he said . . . "believed the purpose of these programs was more about rewarding friends than solar panels or high-speed internet or EV charging.” More Hoaxing with our tax dollars. Climateers, you can believe what you want to believe, make up fake science, drive what you want to drive, and do whatever you want WITH YOUR OWN SELF AND OWN MONEY. However, to use the power of the government to declare, force, mandate, regulate, spend MY GRANDCHILDREN'S MONEY, etc. is the hoax. The EPA, DOE(nergy), DOT, DOI(nterior), etc should not be used to bludgeon Americans and be crony reward systems.

Hoaxsters gonna hoax: "Biden officials have insisted there is “no turning back” on EPA-funded programs such as the $27 billion it dished out to nonprofits via the new Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund . . . has reported that much of this money has been awarded to outfits with strong ties to the Democratic party. “The situation at the EPA is troubling – it’s not an agency that is supposed to be in the spending, or giving out money business at all,” Bakst said. “It’s not like this is a small amount of money that the EPA is doling out, and much of the money is going to the creation of what amount to slush funds for nonprofits.”

Mark Mills, the Executive Director of the National Center on Energy Analytics (NCEA). “To pull this off, you would need something like $4 trillion worth of hardware, and that’s not counting additional power plants you’d need and the national grid to handle the expected growth in power demand. You’ve also got land issues – where are you going to put all this?” In other words, the national infrastructure plan rests on an “if we build it, they will come” dream, according to auto market experts and economists. Even the people at Climate Crisis acknowledged in November that “the dream of the $25,000 EV is dead.” Physics does not abide by mandates very well. Stoopid physics.

Maybe he is deporting all of the illegal aliens from the west coast to Greenland (they have environmental there, dontchaknow? It’s right in the name) and needs to send ‘em via the canal. Then, the next batch that comes along at the border he will just put ‘em on a train to Canada who seems to love denigrating America whenever possible, you know, like allies do. But first Canada must declare itself a sanctuary state and hate America even more than California does. It’s all basic logic.

I think it is more of don’t than can’t.

Call me Psycho. Nice Stripes movie speak drop. I actually have Sawyer cousins from Rhode Island. Absolute psychos.

This is the most reasonable and thought out mandate of this decade - perhaps of all time including the ten commandments. And will lead to less human misery than all of the other mandates combined.

Again we find the politicians of the EU coming out against the politicians of the EU. But the Euros still have no balls. Waiving fines does not argue against the fact that there should be none. It merely is asking for an indulgence from the pope rather than stating that the whole idea is corrupt and could only be propagated by a bunch of cotton headed ninny-muggins

Which is why we have sexist insurance rates that charge young men more . . . or perhaps that are based on actual science. And what the OP (I think you are referring to me in this case) means is that we don't need more dummies and that the lady in the video is a blowhard who is trying only to create hate and discontent where none is warranted. Women die at about half the rate as men on the roads of America. No more dummies costing millions of tax dollars "to study and develop" are needed. If the insurance industry or the automotive industry wants to use their shareholders' dollars to study and develop better dummies then let them do it.

Duke, Duke, Duke Duke Duke. Crash simulatons (FEA computer models) place the model for the 5th percentile female (i.e. tiny) and the model for the 95th percentile male ( i.e. gargantuan) occupants into the hundreds if not thousands of computer crash simulations run for every vehicle model. We don't need more dummies involved in this topic. Actual crash tests (not simulations) are used to validate the simulations. Those are extremely expensive and are mostly used to fine tune the computer models so more design space, options, conditions, and scenarios can be quickly tested for that itty bitty little lady.. Furthermore, we have real crash data. Lo and behold, vehicles are far safer for women than for men. Facts outweigh leftie sexist stupidity. Women are half as likely as men to die in a car crash. No more dummies needed in this conversation.

Good on the original spending bill failing. And further good on the debt ceiling not being raised. Now, a pox on both your (dems and repubs) houses until you balance the budget with a component of debt ceiling reduction built in over time to get my grandchildren and their children out of perpetual hock. All at zero inflation.

of being distasteful to New York democrats. Nothing more. Paraphrasing the jury instructions, "If you are not sure of the crime - because we literally made it up - but don't like him anyway then he's guilty." Let's consider other people who were convicted by "juries of their peers" or the equivalent in history yet seemed to be deemed able to lead a country (or more) by those paying attention: Nelson Mandela George Washington et al William Wallace Jesus Christ The only jury that matters - the American Electorate - disregarded that farce for what it was and returned a verdict of duck you to the New York DA, judge, and jury. In other words, "OVER RULED". P.S. Before anyone gets the vapors; I am not comparing Trump with any of these individuals. I am debunking the concept that a conviction by a corrupt process says anything about the character of the "convicted".

A parking lot is for parking while using the services of the establishment. Fuel cars elsewhere. Like normal people/cars do. I do consider the opposing argument that these spots are simply for the mentally handicapped to mirror the spots for the physically handicapped.

Let me get this right: Your argument is that the insurrectionist expert criminals who became FBI informants were planted in a peaceful protest to incite an insurrection - one without guns, of course. They then did criminally incite such insurrection in accordance with their expert criminality but had prior arranged immunity from the consequences of inciting such insurrection? isn't that exactly the "conspiracy" that those you are ridiculing say came true?

And none investigated, arrested, charged, jailed, convicted, etc. These "informants are criminals and members of criminal groups" did no crimes in the biggest federal crime of the past 160 years?!? What are the odds??? Really, what are the odds? . . . Bueller . . . Bueller. Do FBI get blanket immunity - like Hunter Biden - for everything they have done or may do? Or only for the things in which they are helping out the FBI? Does an informant about money laundering get immunity against insurrection? I suspect the immunity is for a narrow band of crimes and time and crimes outside of their particular expertise are still able to be prosecuted. Or were all these insurrection informants - even the 23 supposedly not on the clock?

Yes. That is why only 32 different states, DC, and several US territories have selected women leaders. And women hate women in red states. Especially the ones that have had women governors like Texas, South Carolina, Kentucky, Montana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Kansas, South Dakota, Iowa, Wyoming. The latest two republican women governors preside over the he-man women hating testosterone dens of New Hampshire and Puerto Rico. Here are the states never to have had a woman governor. Note the world famous true blue chick havens such as California, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota. They must really hate their women to love their women so much yet not be able to find their way to make one governor. Or, maybe . . . just maybe, genitals have nothing to do with elections any longer. Representing the goals and needs of the electorate is more highly correlated with electability than chromosomes. 18 states have never had a female governor: California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

How many of those 26 "non-agents just happening to be on the mall that day minding their business" got arrested and prosecuted? I am sure one of our data flinging savants on these boards can give us the probability that of any random group of 26 people in the J6 crowds not one of them get even a visit from the feds. I suspect that we can prove a statistically significant difference in behavior of the DOJ and FBI to these "non-agents not acting in any official capacity" from those in the crowd right next to them. If there is a difference in the official behavior toward those 26 "non-agents" then it is right and proper to presume they were acting in some official capacity. It's just math but my math has been declared bad so I defer to my math-betters to do the calc.

Also known as a crime. So, what is going to happen? Were the criminals democrats? Then nothing. Were the criminals in the DOJ republicans (let's wait for the laughter to subside . . . . . )? Then solitary confinement while awaiting federal courts to work their way to create 37 or more felonies from a single action that has never been prosecuted before and has no victims and is beyond the statute of limitations and will be tried in a jurisdiction that has more than 90% of people who think that republicans are evil incarnate presided over by a judge who makes up the rules as he goes along and says "if the prosecution did not prove a crime was committed you can still convict the defendant if you generally don't like him". How can anyone doubt the DOJ and its standing as an ethical institution serving the citizenry of the US? Those people must be conspiracy theorists.

We have proof they also get very agitated and will attack you personally if you disagree with them. Especially if you do so providing facts, logic, data, and experience.

Another self-inflicted wound leading to a manmade disaster. Nissan went all in on full EVs and completely neglected their customers' desires for other powertrain configurations (traditional hybrids like the Prius and/or PHEV). So, now they are f'ed and trying to figure out how to get back to making cars people want.