Lipdrag

I write this as a legitimate question: There are known actual cases of babies surviving an abortion attempt, being born, but not leaving the room alive. Are there an equal number of people (actually 2 or 3 times the number of dead babies because at least 2 and maybe more people were in on the illegal death) in jail for it? Of course, the actual reported number is probably very much lower than the actual occurrence due to the conspirators having every incentive not to report it. Did that monster from Philadelphia several years ago (Gondell?) go to jail for killing babies after they were born? Or for some other crime? I did find this bit of data: "Importantly, even with only 10 states having ever required reporting, there are 277 known cases of infants born alive following an abortion."

And Donna Brazile. Isn't it crazy when the Dems actual behavior is more reprehensible than even the conspiracy theorists can conjur?

I hear the Springfield families have invited Trump to a memorial with them in the pet cemetery. No cameras allowed.

She says that because she loves you. She tells me something different.

Once a society/culture/ethnicity convinces its girls that being a mother is not the most important and precious thing in the world then it is lost. We often talk about rights and freedom. But responsibility is a thing. And choosing not to have children is to choose to abdicate the responsibility to provide a stable and sustainable culture. Outsourcing procreation is to commit societal/cultural/ethnic suicide. There are some small minority groups of Western-Culture based people get the mix of rights and responsibilities right. However, Isrealis and religious Westerners (the only groups currently reproducing at or above replacement rate of 2.1 births per woman) are not sufficient in number to maintain a birthrate sufficient to perpetuate Western culture.

W'Rasta - your points are interesting. However, I see things slightly differently. Trump has never enjoyed the full weight of the Republican party. The Never Trumpers on the right in 2016 and 2020 were loud and proud. If conservative voters are aware enough to even know of nearly invisible bureaucrats about presidential fitness I think they are more likely to stay home or write in Mickey Mouse than vote for the most leftist candidate in history. I think the number of stay-at-homes / 3rd party voters on the right will be quite a bit fewer than the following who will move to Trump: marginal rates of BIPOCs moving to Trump marginal rates of single women who resent men in their bathroom marginal rates of soccer moms who now have to buy generic Mac'n'Cheese rather than Kraft Deluxe marginal rates of young single men (historically a very low voter turnout) who are sick of being told about all their privilege I know we are talking about popular vote over/under prognostications so, without doing actual population growth models and forecasts (I leave that to our esteemed colleague and noted swimming expert, WrestleKnowNothing) I stand by my seat of the pants call: Trump - 80 million votes: Harris - loses if 86 million and wins if 87 million. However, to veer a bit to an electoral college analysis: Many of these individuals live in urban/suburban areas so they have an exaggerated effect in swing states. If they simply lower the margin of victory of Harris in 5 or 6 counties (those containing Milwaukee, Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Las Vegas, etc). Just like last time: It all comes down to when the polling station counts are suspended on election night, what the Trump lead is, and if the reserve ballots can be counted to get her over the top in these cities. Now, what is your call for the number of votes Harris needs to win?

Birth more Koreans.

I don't think Trump will get 86 million. Trump got 63+ million in 2016 and 73+ million in 2020. Just by population aging factors (older Americans are more conservative) I suspect that about 80 million Trump votes is not unreasonable. My point, however, is that in order for Kam-eleon to win the swing states to get an electoral college victory the Dems will have to produce about 87 million ballots with her name marked. I guess they can produce fewer if they double count 'em like last time. So, the pool bet I am proposing is the number of ballots the Dems will need to be able to COUNT marked for Harris to defeat Trump. I think the over/under is 87 million.

Hmmm. Further "no evidence" of democrats (Dallas is all dem now) committing election fraud.

Biden got 81 million ballots (maybe, unless we remove the double tallied ballots). He got no where near 81 million individual American citizens who cast a vote for him. There is MASSIVE evidence that this happened all over the country. No need to be an election denier to accept this fact. Let's see how much MORE popular than Biden and Obama the Kam-eleon is. What is her over/under for ballot count. I think the Dems will need to generate 87 million ballots marked for Kam to overcome Trump's actual votes. Shall we start a betting pool on this?

Hamas - the government of the Palestinians which invaded another country and took Americans as hostages - is still solely responsible for every death in Gaza. I am not surprised that Israel is pursuing release of its hostages and the exterrmination of Hamas. I am aghast that America is not going after Hamas also for their war crimes. Just like the Ayatolla and his friends had their "come to Jesus moment" (see what I did there, clever) as Reagan was inaugurated in 1981 with the hostages Iran took does anyone think that Hamas' might get an attitude adjustment if Trump is about to be Inaugurated again in January?

There is nothing stable about this. Unless one considers death of an ethnic and cultural as a long term state of stableness. I guess the Neanderthals have been stable for several millenia now. https://archive.is/dGiQX

The debate was pre-taped secretly. Here is part of Trump's closing:

According to our leftie colleagues on this board illegal aliens are so much more law abiding than regular 'muricans that all crime will soon disappear if we keep replacing 'muricans with illegals. Therefore this report of crime by an illegal alien must be disinformation perpetrated by this little girl acting from her position of privilege and as an oppressor against BIPOCs.

Wait . . . how is the DOJ working plea deals when there is NO EVIDENCE of election fraud. It's not happening. Just suggesting that it is happening can get you in trouble with the White House and put on there "please censor this guy" list sent to social media companies. Is the White House now going to censor the DOJ?

Nothing is protected if the lefties want something else more. Conservationist greenies have met their match in climateer greenies. The fems are learning this the hard way now that chicks have lost their special status to the transits. You’re special and a protected class until someone specialer than you comes along.

Garland and the FBI. Liars Lie. Crime statistics: FBI statistics vs Victim Reports. Correlated in the past. Now . . . Garland says all is getting better. Victims being more victimized! “What you find is that these two measures, prior to 2020, generally moved along together, but, since 2020, they’ve moved in opposite directions in each year, often by very large amounts,” he added. “If you take 2022, which is the last complete data that we have final data for both of those two measures, while the FBI showed a 2 percent drop in reported violent crime, the National Crime Victimization data showed a 42 percent increase in violent crime.” Indeed, in 2021, the FBI reported 387 violent crimes per 100,000 people. The figure dropped to 380.7 per 100,000 people in 2022. Yet, the National Crime Victimization survey found that reports of violent crimes increased 42 percent, from 16.5 incidents per 1,000 people in 2021 to 23.5 per 1,000 people in 2022.

That pesky Constitution. It keeps getting in the way of people who know they are smarter than everyone else enacting their plans to make everyone else do what they want. I see the Constitution as a straightjacket for the midwits. It stops them from hurting others and themselves. And they are pissed off about it!

Science is sexist!! Don't be sexist. Broads hate that.

Objective measures are RACIST!!!! And SEXIST!!! Numbers have no feelings so therefore they do not feel the Kam-eleon's truth. And her believed truth is that she secured the border when she wasn't the border czar in charge of root cause analysis. Oh, by the way, the root cause analysis concluded by her and her compatriots on the Hate/Blame America First left have determined that the people were crossing the border to get into America illegally in record numbers is because America sucks. Joy.

Isn't that an actual job? I guess cattlemen consider that white gold if from a champion bull.

It is not like they could accidently receive ballots which could then be accidently filled out and accidently used to 'correct" any un-approved outcome of the election results by the citizens. That would be absurd. The illegals getting ballots due to being illegally on the voter roles will legally return those ballots to election officials declaring the they may not vote due to be illegals. THAT'S why those county election officials refuse to clear the voting rolls of all illegals. Natche Next question. (Maybe one of our leftie friends can tell us why they won't take illegals off the voting rolls. Lefties declare their own Replacement Theory to be a conspiracy so there is no goal for illegals to vote illegally so no valid reason to leave them on the voting rolls from a leftie principle standpoint.)

And we all thought Chris Farley was the clownish oaf of the family. Nope. Ford's Farley has made Tommy Boy look like a genius.

"By now there is little doubt that the policies most commonly adopted to address climate change and curb greenhouse emissions — enormous subsidies for green energy and ever-tighter restrictions on the use of fossil fuels — have not been effective. After a quarter-century of increasingly clamorous alarms about CO2 and the imposition of sweeping laws and regulations to curtail greenhouse gases, governments can report very little accomplishment. "Global fossil fuel consumption and energy emissions hit all-time highs in 2023," Reuters reported in June. Renewable energy is up a little, thanks to all those subsidies, but its growth has been in addition to conventional fuels, not instead of them." https://jewishworldreview.com/jeff/jacoby090524.php3 https://www.cato.org/blog/iras-energy-subsidies-are-more-expensive-you-think Yet governments and greenies double down. "Ban ban, regulate, strangulate" is the greenie energy policy that is not only ineffective but worse, costs money and freedom and liberty and gives the government authority that does not exist in the Constitution. That makes it less than useful: it is destructive.