scourge165

It's...incomprehensible. This seems like it was as much to get back at his wife more than anything...but who knows for sure. I hope he's alive and they find him...and he has to live with this every day the rest of his life.

No...killing your 3 little girls...is decidedly more selfish than airing out your grey matter. WTF is wrong with you? Also...incredibly disrespectful to the Military. Lots of guys have PTSD. They don't take their little girls out, zip tie them, put a bag over their head and let them slowly suffocate. And the girls were spread out...over 100 yards away from each other...which suggests to me...they started running when they saw what "dad" was doing to them. Eating a bullet is NOT as selfish as that is. You also constructed this...theory around the idea that he saw combat. I've yet to see anyone say he saw combat. What we know is he was going through a divorce and homeless at the time this happened.

No shot. Musk publicly supported eliminating the EV tax credit before Trump became President. I think Musk is self serving and realizes that if we continue down the path we've been on with regard to the debt, it's going to hurt everyone. I don't like either, but some of this is getting petty. Cutting the SpaceX contracts hurts everyone. This Bill is also going to hurt everyone. And there's not going to be a "68% tax increase" unless this bill goes through. That's...jus ridiculous.

Oh, so now we don't believe anything Trump says? LOL...he's talking about his FEELINGS. I believe he is "very disappointed in Elon." That's not the same as me believing Covid is a "hoax" or that there are "Millions of people over 120 receiving Social Security."

Strange then, given Trump's history Epstein, Acosta and after promising and now with the authority, he hasn't released it. Also strange how he wished Epstein's pimp well. He could just release it and end all doubt and we wouldn't have to just "believe" you and your 'the other side is bad,' argument.

Yup. "Shut up," is over my head...

Don't like that one? Blame Trump, not me. By the way, you quoted PART of that video in reposting Bennie Johnson, just one of the guys who took millions from Russia. Who's next? Tim Pool, Dave Rubin?

I might be inclined to bet on Kasak...but Taylor just won the National Championship and... he's a stud. Feels like the defending champ should be #1 Aside from the confusion over Ruth, just...no. You have McEnelly who pushed Starocci and Keck to the limit, scored on Starocci and he's #2. Rocco Welsh is #5? A guy who already took a 2nd as a True Freshmen? Ferrari certainly belongs in the mix, but...I don't see how you have anyone ahead of McEnelly and then Welsh at this point. I'm also confused how 1-5 is B1G and there's no Sinclair in there, but...that's not a B1G issue. Also, is Iowa really gonna waste a year of Arnold? I don't know how they avoid it unless Ferrari goes '97...which I don't know if he does if his Brother is wrestling(I don't know what's going on there). This is a BIG year for Iowa. I want to see Jordan Williams Wrestling a full 7 minutes and attacking. If he can do that, he's got MASSIVE upside.

1. Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) Founded in 1979 by John Tanton, the Federation for American Immigration Reform is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., that advocates for significant reductions in both legal and illegal immigration to the United States. FAIR's stated objectives include reducing overall immigration to 300,000 a year over a sustained period and opposing policies like birthright citizenship and the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. The organization engages in lobbying efforts and public campaigns to influence U.S. immigration policy. splcenter.org+4ballotpedia.org+4loc.gov+4bridge.georgetown.edu FAIR has been a subject of controversy. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has designated it as a hate group, citing its ties to white supremacist ideologies and its efforts to severely limit immigration into the United States. mediabiasfactcheck.com+1splcenter.org+1

Sure...it was a McConnell Bill(A hero of the Republicans by the way) because he appointed Lankford. Strange that the Republicans supported the Bill until Trump came out and explicitly said it'd hurt him in the election... If you don't get the bill, Trump doesn't get to run on the border.

Awe...c'mon! Make my argument for me!!!

There's no other response than "But Biden."

I don't know what you're talking about here. I didn't focus in on any wording...you're wrong. I've proven you wrong in this post and now you're just doing the 'nuh-uh, you are.' I'm not desperate, I'm just done. I pointed out the private companies Hitler did business with, I pointed out the Government run industries that he privatized, I've pointed out the likes of Friedrich Krupp and other industrialists who supported Hitler. YOUR argument is, 'but...it the National Socialist Party,' and I even addressed that. If you need to believe that Hitler, the MOST obvious example of the far right we've ever seen...is in fact not because you fall back to these lazy talking points, ok. Ignorance, unlike stupidity is a choice. Remain ignorant(though as I said earlier, I don't believe YOU believe your argument at this point).

Yes, it's a VERY common trait for socialists to come into authority and take Government runs industries and...privatize them! You're flailing here...badly. You're effectively arguing 'dictator=leftist.' I've provided ample evidence and now you're just trying to water down this debate and dumb it down. Hitler wasn't a socialist, he was on the far right.

I've addressed only the substance. You don't like the facts, so you will ignore the facts. That's...as expected.

I'll just keep repeating this and you can reconcile how an Ethnocentric Nationalist who took Government owned industries, privatized them and then worked with private industry...was a Socialist.

Please define Conservative and Progressive for me, will ya bud? Because it's NOT Democrat or Republican. How do you have such a rudimentary understanding of even the most basic terms? When one side wants to PRESERVE life in a Country as it currently exists, they are...what? When one side wants CHANGE, they are...what? Can you answer this most BASIC question?

LMFAO!!!!! wallbuilders.com! Oh god... you should not be allowed to talk about higher education any more; You've already lost this debate when you use the Barton family. Again, the Germans literally PRIVATIZED industry, banned unions and leaned on industrialists in order to thrive. I like the argument that despite Hitler emphasizing personal property rights, THIS little snippet proves he...didn't honor them' Yes...BECAUSE HE WAS A DICTATOR!! They seized all Jewish owned property and business and transferred it either to the state or to PRIVATE industry... which is PRETTY tough when you're a socialist!

This VERY sentence tells me you don't understand "Left" and "right" to begin with. It was America's CONSERVATIVE wing that was legislating segregation. You don't even know what conservative or progressive means! The PROGRESSIVES were against segregation.

LOL...dude, what are you talking about? NOBODY said he was a globalist. He was an Ethnocentric Nationalist! That...IS about as Right Wing as you can get. He also took STATE owned industries like Steel, Mining, Banking and PRIVITIZED them in an attempt to garner support from industrialists and stimulate economic growth. It was PRIVATE INDUSTRY that propelled the Nazi Party to prominence starting in 1932. He banned labor unions, he threw socialists(and communists) in Prison! That you keep arguing he was a "Socialist" in the face of ALL the evidence at this point means you KNOW you're wrong, you can't admit you're wrong, but you're going to double down and keep arguing because you don't understand where and why they were named the NAZI party and as long as you can repeat that one line...again, despite ALL historical and empirical data, you can just keep cutting and pasting that same reply! I'm honestly getting embarrassed for you. Err...but...he wasn't a Globalist and... and it says NAZI, so he was a leftist! He is the definition of "FAR RIGHT," and I really can't believe this is even being debated... It really says a lot about you that you not only don't already know this, but that you're so insecure about Hitler's politics being far "right," that you have to argue this hard. It says even more that you have to call me a Communist to begin with or assign the beliefs of Mao or Lenin to me. It's an intellectually lazy argument people who aren't capable of independent thought fall back on(sorta like calling everyone they don't like a NAZI)... but I'm pretty sure yo KNOW you're wrong here, you're just not willing to admit as much.

I can see the more direct contact now in the replay at 17:40. Originally it just looks like a glancing blow. That doesn't change my initial point though. That's just part of the sport. Fix is standing there on the edge, head down. Vito shoots a blast double. I'm not sure what you want him to do. You asked for a stoppage. You can always get a stoppage on a shot to the head. But do we ban the double? Squared stance, head down...it's just not a big deal to me.

You're talking about right after Vito gets out, it's 2-1 at that point(I think) and Vito shoots him out, right? LOL...yeah, I'm saying his head doesn't "collide directly into Daton's face." Also, there IS a stoppage when there's a hard head to head collision(just as with the eye pokes) IF the Wrestler reacts. You'd think if he shot him straight into the face there, you'd think Fix's head would snap back...or at least some reaction.

LOL...I'm going to tell you he doesn't "blast through Daton's face on this shot." I'm not going to tell you he didn't "intentionally lower" his head and shoot because...THAT'S PART OF THE SHOT. You have to lower your levels. This is basic Wrestling. I don't care about the commentary, but using this example just because the announcers said something is silly. That was nothing. I don't know what you want. To ban a blast double? You want to plant your head right in someone's chest and run through him. If the opposing Wrestler is going to drop his head...he's going to feel it. We're not playing patty cake. This is part of the sport, it's always been part of the sport. It's physical. Vito is shooting him off. I'm kinda shocked anyone would have a problem with that shot. What would you have the sport do? Have a ref determine who is going for a legitimate shot and who isn't?

Yes, I am...and thank you for again confirming that was as shallow as your thought process on Hitler's policies went! It's... honestly amusing when I've explained the origin of the "NAZI" title several times. Also, how do you not just KNOW this? You took TWO runs through College. Jesus...YES, Hitler was vehemently opposed to Socialism... I don't know what your argument is OTHER than there's NO examples of extreme right wing ideologies that are bad...and you're so ignorant, you can't wrap your head around Hitler being one of them.

Not even a little bit. I'm saying we KNOW Trump was at the Island... ergo, he'd be in the "Epstein files," but merely being present at the Island wouldn't be enough to conclude he was abusing children. I don't now how you concluded that I arrived at the "probability" of anyone's guilt. Irrespective of the Epstein files, I thought the Acosta nomination in and of itself should have been disqualifying(particularly using MAGA standards).