GreatWhiteNorth

There... there it is! A sighting of the rare Husker_"Zero substance"_Du in the Idaho Bates Motel! "En vogue" - yes, it is using its natural camouflage. Hiding behind words it doesn't understand in hopes you don't either. Clever. Don't underestimate this one. Follow the smell of oven-baked meat. Bring your varmint rifle just in case. The Motel does seem infested. Strange that this creature tries to portray itself as intelligent and others that disagree with it as children. Not smart, but cult-leader type sneaky.

Gotta say - this reads like Husker is auditioning for a job at Fox news.

Yep - but I always preferred to put it in the fridge for a while and let it cool and settle while I finished chores.

Ahhhh... yes. That creepy area does appear to be particularly conducive to this species. Kootenai County, Idaho it would appear. No grills or smokers available - just ovens. Good eye, ionel. Well done. If anyone comes across this area, stay well clear. It is far more dangerous than it appears. If you have an AR rifle, you might want to bring it. No doubt vermin lurk here.

I found it to be an interesting exercise. Just for fun, maybe take a swing at it...

...and then Husker_"Zero substance"_Du chimes in with the usual silliness. Pointed out the lack of a rebuttal, even though the rebuttal was actually produced 2 hours prior. Shhhhh... let's keep a safe distance away and watch this creature in its natural habitat. Amazing really. Best not to disturb it, it can get quite angry very quickly. And is perilously unpredictable. Doesn't have a lethal bite but is equipped with very sharp teeth. Wouldn't want to accidentally trip over this one.

Did I miss your post with your suggestion(s) for Music Mount Rushmore?

Ummm... you seem to be sinking lower. Seriously. Alex Jones is a verified nut. The 'suck' thing you posted about liberals is just angry and weird.

Good advice. The back-and-forth insults escalate into nothing good, yet we all seem to get caught up in them sooner or later. Discussion is the only reason I'm here... but it's difficult to avoid the insults. And there it is, just as we are speaking of civility.

The fact is, that I didn't say that. You are posting nonsense and it is disturbing how bad you are at this. Calm down. Read my post again, more carefully.

you're... <insult> you're... <insult> you're... <insult> Listen, it's a discussion board. We're here to discuss... kind of the point of the board to begin with. I really do expect more from you. Your posting recently has been truly disappointing.

Bongino is a nut. Reality isn't a dumb action movie. The Secret Service won't be murdering a floor of civilians. Just crazy talk.

So, your actual name is Felicia? Cool.

"So many words"? What? You give an excuse why you can't read a short post - then, proceed to post one just about the same length in response? I'm very much OK with discussing topics, but if you want to jump around the topics like a politician to avoid actually discussing any of them. Well, that's your choice. You be you. If you get to the point where you want to honestly discuss a topic, look me up... or don't. Discussion, as a catalyst to mutual understanding, is something I appreciate. But not everyone needs to think that way.

If you don't follow him much, you might not know it - but Willie Nelson has been a prolific songwriter. Wrote pretty much all his stuff, and then some. List of songs written by Willie Nelson - Wikipedia Ever heard of Patsy Cline's "Crazy"? It was written by Willie. There's a pretty interesting story about that one, in particular. I don't regularly listen to Dylan, Jackson, or Elvis. But that doesn't get in the way of my attempt at unbiased perspective. It is, after all, not about my favorites. Being worldwide celebrities, changing what music and musical performance is for future generations, etc. These are the things that weighed heavily on my choices.

I'm not defending Ban - he's doing his thing. You're doing yours. I'm doing mine. My take here is that you are referring to THE POLICY as if it were a real thing. It's not. I just isn't. Democrats don't think criminals should be getting a free pass - except the fringe. The rest don't at all. It isn't a "lower class obstacles" issue for the majority of D's. It's a crime problem we need to rectify. D's aren't that far from R's. We're all living the same way. It shouldn't surprise anyone to realize that we all feel basically the same way about issues and policies. Sure, some R's believe in flat-earth, ivermectin, fake moon landing, etc. But just the fringe. Most are levelheaded. It is weird that you insist on making this a blue vs red standoff. When it isn't one. Moderate R and D basically agree. Fringe R and D don't... but they are both kooks.

Way to chime in like some weird kid spectator who is a little too infatuated.

Way to man up and take responsibility for insulting me. You are a beacon of good will.

More nutty conspiracy theory garbage... "documents, emails, and his own words"... as if it's some kind of proof. Does anyone else realize that you just asked me to find the proof you don't have? That is a terrible way to make an argument. Imagine that in a court of law - "I've got all kinds of proof - photographs, cancelled checks... well, just not with me. But you just look into it." Pffff... your argument is a just pathetic. (Which would explain your name calling. Always the lowest common denominator.)

Don't purposely be obtuse, you know what my post meant - and if others don't, they can read it again. It was clear. Posters here sometimes purposely hide their gender. Which is 100% cool. It's an anonymous BBS. When other posters refer to them using gender-specific terms based on what they read from their posts, how the heck are these other posters supposed to know they are using incorrect terms? Answer = they can't possibly know. And it's "over the line" to accuse them of wrongdoing when they can't possibly know. So - who here thinks it's a good idea to attack posters for not knowing someone's hidden gender? Answer = nobody. But, for whatever reason, you've decided it's a cause you should take up. So, just you on the attack. You are posting exactly like someone who is "woke"... mad as a cut snake because the wrong pronoun was used. Ooof.

Great, more dumb conspiracy theory posts... Just what we all need.

That's juuuuuust a bit over the line. Many of us know posters here who are women, but who don't openly share that information. Makes sense to me. I have no problem with anonymous posters remaining anonymous - including not sharing their gender. But it isn't quite fair to call others out for not "knowing" another poster's gender. And if you want to start with the "you should use the recommended pronouns", don't look now - but you're starting to sound like a progressive liberal. Pretty "woke" of you.

Fauci and Osterholm were not a small part of what got us through the pandemic. They were instrumental. Weirdo groups will be weirdos. It's what they do. Doesn't change anything in the real world. We should all check Osterholm if we have any questions. No better source.

Really good post! I'll use this story (and the 'Overgrown Pocket Watch' part in particular) again.

So, what's with the checkered background? Does that represent your 'checkered' past? Or just that the original was a PNG with a transparent background that could have been cool, but you butchered it into a lame JPG to post it here. I don't know. I'm guessing the latter. C'mon Ionel! If you're going to go the humor route, go 100% or don't go at all. Presentation matters. On a silly BBS like this - it's all you've got.