nhs67
-
Posts
9,570 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
70
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Teams
College Commitments
Rankings
Authors
Jobs
Store
Everything posted by nhs67
-
I once predicted that Brooks, Beard, and Nevills would have six at Penn State. Had I just committed to the weight class of the years they were eligible I would have been correct (Dean instead of Beard one year and Kerk this year). My take was still well off, though.
-
What does this mean for Salazar? Even if he beats McEnelly in a wrestleoff, does Minny give him to nod or his walking papers to ensure four years of McEnelly?
-
PK is going 184. The question is if Starocci will go 184 or 197. He didn't even mention 184 in his Pre-OTT interview. He mentioned 197 then said "I don't know... I like ruling 174." He also said Haines doesn't like the cut to 157, so him at 174 is an option. Maybe less of an option after he just lost to Facundo at OTT, but still an option.
-
A ) Brooks hasn't beaten DT twice (yet). B ) Yazdani is currently injured. It is unknown if he will be healed in time.
-
Good. A National Team without JB doesn't seem right.
-
No. It is the winner to face JB for True 2nd in the Challenge Tournament, which is 3rd on the ladder. The bracket is already there to physically look at. Edit: See SS below
-
JB didn't weigh in today. Whoever wins the 3rd place match between Mesenbrink and Jacques will be 3rd on our ladder and win the 'True 2nd' match over JB via forfeit - which will be 3rd on our ladder at 74 KG.
-
Ben: Hire my brother and you will basically get me, too. UW: How about you or nothing? Ben: ... UW: * BONO GETS AN EXTENSION *
-
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
-
How many calls in both of those matches were overturned because of challenge calls?
-
Did you watch the same match? The ref won that match, not Brooks.
-
You know my statement is true.
-
Clearly biased refs were clearly biased against both Burroughs at 74 KG and Valencia at 86 KG. That was bullshit.
-
Why was Session 1's thread 'Official' and this one is not?
-
Dear J'den Cox, Thank you. Sincerely, The USofA
- 13 replies
-
- 15
-
-
.png)
-
-
The criteria has been the same for eight years now. They won a medal at a weight that the IOC doesn't allow, not UWW. USAW is respecting UWW in this regard.
-
Perhaps they should have tried to win a medal at a non-Olympic weight last year.
-
Starocci will be at 197lbs for them next year.
-
Cox - Moore up top and Aiello - Trumble on bottom at 97 KG.
-
Wow. Aiello just steamrolled Macchiavello in the 2nd period. It is looking like he gets Trumble next. Not sure, but pretty sure that Aiello has owned that series.
-
Cox with a horseshit of a match win there. 1-1 criteria wins should result in both losing and their next round being a 'bye' or 'forfeit' victory for the next guy up.
-
Damn. Hard for me not to root for Thicclay, but I was definitely rooting for Starocci there.
-
Back and forth with Thicclay... Thicclay is currently up 5-3, but Starocci has answered every time thus far.
-
It's starting to look like Starocci is going to get that rematch with Marsteller...
-
Furthermore, aside for Brooks, there wasn't a single 197lber that showed to be in Thicclay's class, either. If Starocci goes up, he will be just fine.
