Fair enough, maybe it’s not many “people.” @bnwtwg definitely though.
Yes, 197’s often do better at heavyweight. Using Bastida as an example for not is pretty funny, considering he was undefeated going into NCAA’s including wins over the guys that ended up finishing 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th (two of those by major) he was/is most definitely better at heavyweight, but was injured during NCAA’s last year.
Looking at this season, you’ve also got Isaac Trumble, best finish R16 at 197, currently ranked #5 at heavyweight.
Other past examples:
Lucas Davison: best finish R16 at 197, 3x AA and 1x finalist at heavyweight
Cassar: backup at 197, champ at heavyweight
Derek White: slightly over .500 at 197, R12 then NCAA finals at heavyweight
Jacob Kasper: 1-2 at NCAA’s at 184, 2x AA at heavyweight
As a lightweight guy, I would actually disagree that “125’s often do better at 133.” If anything that might be the jump guys struggle with the most. Looking back in the wrestlestat era unless I missed it I don’t see a single guy such as the above that wrestled 125 as a non-redshirt and failed to AA, then bumped up to 133 and AA’d. Sure lots of guys that did well at 125 also do well at 133 though.
Closest example might be Vito who went from 3rd & 4th at 125 to a 2x champ at 133, but if you use that example then you’d also have to use Kyle Snyder in the first list considering he had 4 losses at 197 and only 1 over the next 3 years at heavyweight.