Well I specifically said to penalize Teemer for missing the dual against Miller, so I am being consistent.
Keep in mind H2H is only one consideration, and again with no defined criteria there is nothing saying it needs to be the most important consideration. Primarily it can be used when the 2 guys being compared have similar resumes (generally if they’re not comparable the better guy will have won the H2H except in the case of sitting out).
If you look at the matches Teemer missed, other than Miller the only other guy with an argument over him when looking at the rest of their resumes is Taylor, and yes I probably would put Taylor above Teemer. Last night was the first B10 dual Kasak missed, and the balance of Cannon’s resume (if he’s their starter) doesn’t give him an argument over Kasak IMO. And I wouldn’t even necessarily give Blaze credit for a “win” against Miller, I’d just keep that in consideration when looking at the total resume.
If I had a vote, here is how I’d vote for the top 4:
1. Kasak (undefeated except for the injury default, placed 3rd at 149 and beat Teemer this year who was last year’s finalist)
2. Miller (undefeated, Teemer didn’t show)
3. Taylor (only B10 loss is to Kasak, beat Askey, Teemer didn’t show)
4. Teemer (returning finalist, beat Askey)
So in reality this probably still works out for Miller with Kasak and Teemer on the same side.
5 & 6 is probably the biggest tossup to me. Blaze’s only loss to a B10 opponent is to Miller, and Askey’s only B10 losses are to Taylor and Teemer. An interesting tidbit with these 2 is that Askey lost to Jared Hill of Wyoming, and Blaze MFF’d to Hill. If Blaze had beat Hill that’d probably give him clear criteria over Askey IMO.
At first glance it seems the only dual remaining with major implications for this weight is Nebraska/Purdue but not sure if I missed any.