Yeah I don’t have much issue with 4 wins beating 6 in a dual. 3 over 7 I would. I totally get the “they would have wrestled differently” argument, but I feel like for the most part that doesn’t usually come into play until the last few matches at most. Or is the argument that this scoring system would make the matches more exciting because guys would want to win by more? I’d understand that argument more than “the current scoring is confusing and arbitrary”
Cornhole has “arbitrary” scoring too.
And if we’re talking about confusion, I agree the scoring at NCAA’s would be a much bigger issue.
But if the question is what can we do to get wrestling on TV more, I just think changing the dual meet scoring format would be pretty far down my priority list. Not to derail the thread but off the top of my head IMO all of the below would be more beneficial:
1. Get rid of singlets
2. Cauliflower ear (make guys wear headgear in practice)
3. 3-point takedown and/or pushout rule
4. Get rid of riding time - it encourages stalling and is also confusing to casual fans (IMO moreso than the scoring system)
5. Consistent stalling calls/make it actually a rule that top guy needs to work for a fall