Your argument is historical which there is no argument here about Lamont's accomplishments...I am talking about now - today. Lamont has digressed over the last few years. He is not wrestling well this year either. Do you disagree with that? I was also very clear with the words "so far" which also implies that my statements are to be taken now, today, but that could change later. If Burwick and LaMont wrestle on January 29th and Lamont wins a close match, then I was correct (the difference between the two is not much). If Burwick wins I am correct (if any). You would be correct if LaMont wins that match comfortably. Was it a mistake to choose LaMont over Burwick? Is that change going to get Wisonsin a trophy?