RockLobster

Except that Trump doesn't know binary or hex or even Base10. He's a dinosaur with criminal history/tendencies and dementia. At this point, he's nothing more than a puppet. He will become the president, but will remain a puppet to his wealthy donors. (This isn't something I am celebrating, it is the sad reality of where we currently are.) I suspect it was "president-elect Musk" or his team that replied here. He jumped in and took the reigns at just the right time. He can't legally be elected president, but he can buy the influence. And Trump would rather accept his cash and go golf, then take a nap than pretend he really wants to be any kind of leader (we all witnessed that his last go 'round.) We'll transition to "President Musk" in early January - maybe not formally, but all signs indicate he'll be calling the shots. So many folks in leadership positions in the highest levels of the federal government took an oath to uphold the Constitution. Yet so few of them care about that oath at all. Welcome to the swamp. Same swamp as in 2016 - but 10 times bigger. And Musk and his money is the fattest alligator in it.

This, in a nutshell, explains all of your sophomoric posts. You see the parties as some kind of 'team blue' vs 'team red' competition. Which is exactly why, whether you realize it or not, you are part of the problem. You dumb it down and oversimplify it to the point that it's nothing more than a simple competition of blue vs red (or in your quote, blue vs orange man.) I don't blame you, I blame all of those sources - and there are many... and, then, of course I blame you a little for being hoodwinked by them. Which is exactly why there are so many of them, they encourage the blue vs red hate, and hook suckers like you all day long. Put a red jersey on you and you'll run around cheering Let's go Red! for eternity. Even if you have no idea what you're actually cheering about. Yikes. Uninformed, ignorant people like you scare me.

That is debatable.

Well, you seem to have taken a childish view here. That's OK - we all have our limits. This is one of yours. As I already posted earlier to you specifically. Murder is wrong, do you disagree? You didn't answer my post. Instead, you've typed quite a lot of buffoonery to somehow agree what I've posted clearly. (I guess I should take your childish rant as a compliment - that you agreed with me so strongly.) And the part where You can only push people so far, do you disagree? Is also true. People have limits and you can only push them so far. But - that is not, and I mean zero, excuse for murder. You do understand that, child? You misinterpreted what was said. That's not on her. That's on you. Before you go on yet another childish rant, understand that these things are true... but what's true is not the same as what is absolutely true. So much gray area, so little B&W. In life there are very few absolute truths. Death retains the #1 spot. The rest jockey for position.

Now you're bickering about which quote was about which quote. Move it along, dummy.

Have you? The reason I ask is that there is a significant financial barrier that wasn't erected by accident. If you'd like to meet Trump it will cost you quite a lot of money. It's by design for Trump's financial gain. Consider it a filter. What's interesting here is that if you follow Trump, he only references the billionaires he's known and has met. No matter how bright and shiny you are, you won't make a dent in his circle of billionaires and multi-billionaires. He's always and only about piles of money. 99% of us don't have that kind of money. Which is unfortunate. He's only about the 1%. I don't need to attempt to belittle him with name calling. The facts speak for themselves.

My last post was nothing about you. It was far bigger than you. Whatever your problem is - pay attention, and move it along, dummy.

Or maybe we heavily tax compute processing by AI, crypto-mining, and driverless car tech. All interesting, and all very energy draining. Yet none proven to actually provide anything useful to society other than as a drain. We can all breath for a very long time without concern if wasteful technologies are identified and managed. There's a reason China banned crypto-mining in 2021. And, yes mspart, I agree that plants should be around. Plants should be a much higher priority than tech.

In case anyone hasn't figured out the point I was trying to make... The entire schtick of "show me proof" as a response to a post is getting tiresome. This is a community of somewhat like-minded wrestling fans. We can share ideas, comments, perspectives, and everything else. As much as we disagree on some things, we largely agree on many more things. I like it here, and I mostly enjoy the community. It isn't a court of law. Posts don't require links to "proof." Demanding "proof" of fellow posters is silly. If you need more information, maybe it would be best to try to honestly use google first before politely asking other posters for assistance. That route is so much better than demanding others use google for you. Just a thought - in the interest of civil conversation (which is why we're all here - last time I checked.)

Document that. I won't acknowledge it unless it meets with my approval.

Document that. I won't acknowledge it unless it meets with my approval.

Document that. I won't acknowledge it unless it meets with my approval.

Document that. I won't acknowledge it unless it meets with my approval.

Document that. I won't acknowledge it unless it meets with my approval.

Document that. I won't acknowledge it unless it meets with my approval.

Clarify. What, exactly is your specific problem here? Murder is wrong, do you disagree? You can only push people so far, do you disagree? What part of what was said made you think that you should belittle her? I'll start: I disagree with you using 'Pocahontas' to attempt to belittle someone you've never even met. Keep in mind that she doesn't know you, has never met you personally, and knows nothing about you at all. I do know you, at least from internet forum interactions, and I'd trust her 100% more than you. You suck at this.

Easy there young buck. It's just past time to put the bottle down. And, when you're sober, time to rethink trusting tiktok videos. They are like little bits of video cancer sent directly to you from China. Unless you trust the Chinese government, it's time to do away with that crap entirely.

Good story. I'm interested, tell me more. (But, put the bottle down first, you've obviously had more than enough.)

Yes, exactly. Somehow, now that some of the J6 crowd were willing to accept money for information. They've suddenly turned into paid FBI agents in some peoples' (so-called) minds. (It's almost as if 50% of adults here can't read at an 8th grade level.)

You made it clear that you copied and pasted the information from your included link. What is just as obvious is that you didn't actually take the time to digest the "facts and data" that you were posting. It's as if you found something on the internet and blindly trusted it. Which, by the way, is is a literacy function... one that you failed. So using the information you posted as being actual facts: Let's check some math: #1 - 14% of adults can't read 258m adults in total = so roughly 36m can't read #3 - 19% of high school graduates can't read roughly 90% of adults have a HS diploma 258m adults in total = so roughly 44m can't read see: Census Bureau Releases New Educational Attainment Data These stats appear to be off by 8 million'ish - which is unacceptable BS. Another math check: #2 - 21% of adults read below 5th grade level 258m adults in total = so roughly 54m adults #6 - 45m adults are functionally illiterate (below 5th grade level, per your link) These stats appear to be off by 9 million'ish - which is unacceptable BS. Last one, and not a math check this time: #7 - 50% of adults can't read a book written at 8th grade level Given the way the last election went, I can almost believe this one. Almost. Just another friendly reminder. Don't believe everything you read on the internet. Oh - and one last thing - How do these incorrect stats figure in with the Department of Education? They don't. Another literacy (and logical) function that you failed. Without the DOE, it is very possible the stats would have been worse. The relationship isn't directly causal.

Whoever you claim "we" are. Your words mean nothing. You are anonymous. Just another internet nobody.

If you back up and look at it from a bigger perspective, you might just realize that a "kill all Muslims" chanting guy leading the Pentagon is a bad thing. Not a good thing. So, so many more qualified people for the position. Let it go. This guy has no chance. Save your arguments for the next candidate.

Cool. Because it isn't a single day type thing, it's "always." Fox News sux balls always. Glad you enjoyed the post.

Who are "we"? Who are you speaking for, exactly? You are full of it, that much is a given. But who is it that you represent?

Levels here: Butter on pop tarts is legit Waiting and spitting gum is legit when the interviewer is CP. Then maybe even wait longer and spit two or three times. It's CP, doesn't matter. Eating during the interview = doesn't matter. It's just CP. Feel free. CP is the ultimate softball interviewer. And really, he has no case to crack. Never has. If you're offended by a CP interview. Open Google News and see how little your opinion matters in the world view.