RockLobster

Facts like these are often boring. Because we all know them to be true, and have for a long time. The thing about it is that it's true. You may be bored - but that doesn't change a thing.

How about the idea that some of the local law enforcement was in on it? Since they were the ones who were responsible for security for the area outside-the-fence? (Where the shooter was.) I'm not saying it's true, but I am advancing it as a possibility. One that shouldn't be immediately dismissed. At least not until we've got more answers than we have now. Oh, and the idea that Trump was in on it does make quite a bit of sense. If you think you know Trump and can predict him, you are lying to yourself. He's a spinning top randomly bouncing off objects.

Link to any video where this was actually discussed as actual factual evidence instead of the usual BS from Offthemat and that basket of imbeciles? There hasn't been one posted on this thread yet - just the usual BS. And, don't forget. The outside-the-fence area was the responsibility of the local police (on the left) The inside-the-fence area was the responsibility of the SS (on the right) These are two different areas of security responsibility I've posted often that something stinks here. But to see folks trying to blame the SS Director. That's lazy garbage given the circumstances. It's starting to stink even more now.

Or someone so incredibly vapid that they bring someone into the conversation who has nothing to do with it. Don't stop there. Might as well bring in Hilary, too. Start a 'lock her up' chant. No limits to stupidity. Why not bring Obama into it as well, and ask about his birth certificate. We're discussing a current event with the people who are directly involved - but don't let that stop you. Go nuts.

It's not that simple. You, on the other hand, do appear to be exactly that simple.

That sounds like a legitimate thing to say EXCEPT... You (twit #1) continue to post twit #2 (Offthemat) continues to post It appears neither of you are waiting at all Paul158 and Bigbrog and the rest of the "most of us" you refer to, are still posting You tried to fake a meaningful post, but you've been betrayed by your little basket of muttonheads.

Oh, great. Mr. Originality is back. Calling me the same name yet again... Dig deep, find some creativity. Use a thesaurus (or look up what that is.) Think synonym (or look that up too.)

Been asked and answered... and you're even more pathetic this time around (which is astonishing.)

So you say.. and yet all you have is to keep repeating the weird 'Doodle' quip. It may have been OK once or twice, but it's been far too many times - it's pathetic.

UR Still dumb as dirt - you rattle on with your useless comments and pretend others need to show proof. Go to the Senior Center and sign up for some oldster classes. You might learn to not big as big of a dirt bag.

Basic facts are that : Trump is a giant wuss. There isn't anything about him that is tough. He doesn't have a tough bone in his body. This is simply true. Everything else is politics... the others will argue endlessly, yet they won't change the basic facts.

At least they should find it's a "screen" name instead of a "chart" name or "bird" name.

I can understand that, would seem to be a good gig. Even if you're a pawn of Offthemat around here like the other minions.

In my experience, Asian people tend to be more direct and a bit more age conscious than Americans. That seems to fit your post profile. Not really a "Wow" type comment. Just basic logic. Has nothing to do with good or bad - just logic. Maybe best for you to reconsider your cringe comments about older people looking old. We all get old and it isn't really something that anyone needs to point out as if they've discovered something original. It's something we've all known all along.

You sound extremely Asian - that is a familiar Asian sentiment. The idea that old people should stay out of the public. Never made sense to me when I spent time there. Hmmm.. you're not from Florida at all. Either China or North Korea is my guess - I'm leaning toward NK, but it's almost an even horse race. All this time you've fooled some of us. Then again, most of your group here already knew. All in all - you get no better than a grade of 'D'. It's not an 'F', but it's not much better. You're bad at this.

...ouch, that was a cringe post. Really not super great. We all get old, and we all experience degradation in attractiveness on the way. To single out a person and point out it happened to them is... cringe bad. (We disagree on things from time to time, but generally we seem to agree. Not here.)

"Some platform called Discord"? Ha! OK oldster. That does explain a lot about your persistent old-man anger. (And, yes, they already got full access to his phone.)

...cool that twit #2 has decided to chime in like a muppet. Still no evidence on any of the claims. Unlike these two I am able to use reason and admit a change of opinion based on the introduction of new evidence if it is strong enough to influence my perspective. I invite and welcome any and all evidence that is contrary to my opinion. But without any evidence... I'm left with nothing more than a couple twits.

C'mon smart guy... that's all you can muster? You'll need to put your back into it if you want me to think you are a legitimate poster. Chop chop.

... and here that same muttonhead now decides the exact same post wasn't conspiracy stuff but instead old news. You can't make this stuff up. This poster is dumber than dirt. Scroll up and read them both about 5 or so posts above. Hard to believe he pretends to be an even halfway logical poster.

According to this muttonhead, here I'm reporting conspiracy stuff. Then (scroll down to next post.)

Already been asked and answered. Don't be a twit and continue to claim you know what Trump was looking at. You don't.

Whoa! They were? The FBI is in the early phase of investigation hasn't released any of their findings yet. Who is your source - and which ones did they indicate were in the "line of fire"? This would be good information for the FBI to know if, in fact, you know this to be true.

Not true. 1st - It does matter in terms of the conversation. I was making the point there was no screen (how many times do I have to repeat that?) Which is still true. There appears to have been a chart/sign - but in the photos and videos I've reviewed it appears to be on Trump's LEFT. There may well be another one on his right and just I haven't seen proof of that yet. (See how I admit what I know vs what I don't know? You should try that.) 2nd - "It's what trump was looking at" is absolute 100% pure guesswork by you. There is no video evidence to show what he was looking at. He could have been looking at the shooter, or a sign, or a bird, or a signal from someone off-camera (but not a screen, since there wasn't one there.) We know he was looking at something, we just don't know what. Everybody reading this is aware that you don't know what Trump was looking at any more than anyone else. And that you are making up a fact because it suits you (again.)

Sounds like the SS and local police split up duties. The SS being responsible for the actual rally grounds, and the police responsible for the area outside the fence (where the shooter was.) That alone starts to clarify things a bit.