RockLobster

Glass? I didn't say anything about glass. Neither did Mr. Wray. That's a strange comment. Why would you think any alleged shrapnel would come from glass? Here's a critical thinking question. Do you honestly think you and your fellow minion posters know more about the shooting than the FBI? Serious question.

And you're the one calling me a conspiracy theorist? That's not what he said at all. Neither is it what I necessarily think - but, at this point, it is among the possibilities. Don't take it personally. It's not about you. It's about "critical thinking" and not easily buying into what we hear. What really happened at the shooting matters. That's why the House voted yesterday to form a task force to investigate the shooting. (Yes, it's considered a 'shooting' - no, still not classified as an "assassination attempt." It has yet to be established that the shooter was trying to kill Trump - although so many simply believe it because that's what they're told.) Is it Democrats or Republicans voting for this? Both. the legislation passed unanimously, 416-0. And the task force will consist of both D's and R's. Turns out everybody in the House wants to find out the truth rather than blindly go along with what they're told... and that they all agree with what I'm saying. That there are big questions that haven't been answered. I don't know what your point is. That I shouldn't be questioning mainstream media? Well, then your opinion doesn't matter.

FBI Director Christopher Wray testified on Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee. Did you watch it? Or do you get all your information by just making it up and then posting like a jerk? I did watch it. Christopher Wray, when answering questions from Jim Jordan stated: That is consistent with my working explanation (from the beginning) - I don't believe Trump was shot in the ear at all. I look at the facts, the evidence, and most importantly - the lack of evidence - and then I carefully draw conclusions and am particularly careful not to draw conclusions from media talking points and untrustworthy sources that aren't necessarily rooted in factual evidence. The media and Trump and Trump's campaign says Trump was shot. So some of you blindly believe it. I don't. No need to get angry with me about it. It just appears that I'm more careful with what I believe than you, sheep or lemmings.

Your post is incorrect, I'm not sure exactly why.

If you "can't spell the guys name" ... we have a clear and obvious problem here. How much effort are you expending before making a post? It appears... near zero. Try harder. A lot harder. I don't intend to be critical, but you 100% absolutely suck as a poster if you can't bother with any semblance of knowledge or intelligence.

You obviously have me confused with Trump. (I'm much younger, smarter, and better looking than the orange turd you refer to.)

The older nut bags who believe in whatever political illusion they choose to. All political parties included.

Yuck. Those are some sick, sick people. The radicals of politics deserve a kick in the tail. There are levels of basic decency. Doesn't matter which side, basic decency shouldn't be disregarded.

Not at all Scoot, I didn't realize you needed it explained - otherwise I would have posted this earlier: A “working explanation” refers to a preliminary or provisional explanation that is good enough to be useful for the time being, even if it is not complete or final. It is often used as a basis for further investigation or research.

Are you OK? You just quoted one of my posts twice for no explicable reason, Then seemed sleepy. If anybody knows Rasta's contact info, maybe check on him?

OK, wait a sec - that was jumbled. Let's try this again: She did not inform them or the American Public with updates of the details of the ongoing investigation. Inexcusable. OK. That is absolutely correct. The public should be getting updates on details. She has resigned under pressure - which seems like the right thing to do here. Now that the Director is gone... The big question is who will perform these duties? Who will provide updates of the details of the ongoing investigation? If the answer is 'nobody' - than THAT is inexcusable This is the type of trick the Devil pulls on unsuspecting targets: Pull someone with a damaged message, and replace them with someone with no message at all. I'll reserve judgement until the public starts hearing regular updates on the details of the investigation. No more excuses

I wouldn't argue with you on that. NY politician are consistently big mouths, but I have yet to see one that is trustworthy (either party.)

Not a theory. More of a working explanation. We need one, because authorities have yet to give us one that makes sense. Details are coming out like sludge through a funnel. I hadn't anticipated how slowly these gears would turn. But it doesn't reflect well on the FBI, local Police (LP), or the SS (nor does the resignation of the SS Director.) Until we start getting more facts, I'm inclined to think the SS was not in on it. That they were likely duped. It would appear the kid was recruited to take some shots and duck. Maybe he hit some people, maybe he didn't, we need the ballistics to know for sure. In any case, the LP must have been in on it. They let him wander around, climb on the roof, hang out on the roof, and they even made contact with him on the roof (although we still don't know how the LP was able to climb up to the roof without a ladder... just as we don't know how the kid got on the roof without a ladder either. Perhaps the same ladder that was in the building they were both occupying?) From the audio evidence, there was a 3rd gun - belonging to an LP sniper that... missed. Hmm. We all know kids, when the adrenaline starts rushing they are basically impossible to predict. Maybe he wanted to take one more impulsive look over the roof to see what was happening? Understandable, but if so, a fatal mistake. One other consideration would be if the kid could keep the secret? Come November, the expectation at the time was that Trump was going to easily win - even without the boost the "assassination attempt" would bring him as planned. He'd be able to pardon the kid and all of the LP involved. Wouldn't have to worry about anybody breaking down and fessing up. Then again - maybe someone leaked the kid shooter information to the SS at the last minute to tie up loose ends? The rest of it is still an incomplete picture. But, even at a snail's pace, it keeps moving along. We'll get there.

That's a rather large load of crap (even from you.) Ahem... let's boil this down to something concise. In my personal experience, reading your replies and reactions to my posts you are consistently hateful and angry with your comments. No doubt, in the 99%+ range. It's fine - you can be as hateful and angry as you like. There is no law against it. Proceed as you will. But, I do have the right to call you out for it. Because you are a hateful and angry poster, and you've proven that. And, here, you've proven it again.

I'm not sure I understand UB. Your take is that I should somehow duck my head and join the rank and file and be whatever 'normal' you think is - rather than expressing myself honestly? That's an interesting take. But I won't be doing that anytime soon.

Read your own post dum-dum. The part where it says "Certain words or phrases can also be given special meaning with the use of quotation marks." Yes - that part. The part that explains my specific use. If anyone is full of shit here, it's you. Here's the relevant part from Wikipedia as well as the link to the article. Do better Rasta. We've got more than enough dummies in the world. Aspire to better things, don't sink to lower ones. Link to the Wikipedia article: Quotation marks in English - Wikipedia

Not a new concept - but it will be interesting to see the ballistics report to find out what matches what. That is of course, expecting that we'll see some transparency in all of this.

I have to say it... You're posting like a rotten little hateful bastard. Can't bring yourself to have a meaningful post without insulting the other participants in the election. It's pathetic. In no world, and in no conceivable way, does a shitty post insulting the 'other' party improve anything or anyone in any meaningful way. It's become obvious. You aren't looking for positivity, you're just a hateful bastard trying to stir up trouble that helps nobody in the US. What country did you say you were from, again?

That DOES sound like something a retiree might say

That is a lot of fluff that seems mainly to serve as a way for you to vent. It doesn't sound like you have an actual point to make here. If you have something real to say, say it. Let's simplify this a bit: Twits, by the handful, make dull minded posts against me and you're take is what exactly? That I'm not nice to them? And that you seem to think that somehow that makes me disconnected and projecting? C'mon dum-dum. Take the time to spend a few minutes and put together a serious post that actually makes sense.

Notice I used the word retired in quotes. Do you know what that means here? Apparently you do not. Let me help you here...

I get it, you're always in attack mode. Just as the rest of the MAGA world. Driven by hate and always angry.

Why not? What problem do you have with someone who discourages negative, dangerous, disgusting things. And, instead, encourages people to be better and learn more? What about that message bothers you exactly? You've been so salty with me for a while, but push that aside. What's the problem with something that makes sense and has the goal of making everyone better? What feeds your obvious need to block the idea of making everyone better? It's weird that you continue to do it.

If you are that sensitive... Then this is simply not the place for you.