RockLobster

Exactly. HE SAID means nearly nothing. Pinch the top of your ear. You'll find out there are very few nerve endings there. Could the nerve endings from the top of your ear clearly differentiate between a small caliber bullet and a fragment of a small caliber bullet fired at high speed? No. It's simply not possible to make that differentiation based on feel. (Not that reality would ever stop a phony like HIM to make an outlandish claim that he wants to be true.)

You target me specifically with petty little post, and now you want to defend it as if it didn't happen. I don't have a problem with you as a poster - except your unwillingness to take any responsibility. No projection. You posted what you posted. Why run and hide from it.

You're confusing me with... you.

She was willing to bend over backwards to make him look good... yet he wouldn't let her help him. He'd be much better at golfing in retirement than anything he's doing now.

I'd tend to agree with you. But you've been posting like such a hateful dipshit so much lately. Yes, in particular, toward me for no valid reason. You're completely untrustworthy and post like POS with a broken compass. I agree with the Israeli cause, but I don't agree that it excuses you from posting like a complete nonstop a**hole. If you'd like to be part of joining US citizens with Israel support... as I do... get your shit together. Put a collar on that mindless hate.

For you dummies in the back, Wray made it clear it was either a bullet or shrapnel that hit Trump. (Some dope here mentioned glass, he's a dummy.) As of this moment, we still don't know if it was a bullet or shrapnel from a bullet. We'll eventually know. (The interview between the FBI and Trump is forthcoming.) The important question right now is... Why are these anonymous internet dummies in such a hurry to try to report something as true that isn't yet proven true? Some are children, some have the mental equivalency of children, and others are state sponsored posters just here to try to disrupt logical conversation and push nonsense. It isn't always easy to sort these bad guys out - some are worse than others - but they are all bad and the worst usually appear as the biggest argumentative dipshits.

As I said, it is true that 'nothing factual changed.' You should feel free to discuss this topic with me and all others here. But, child... 'lol' is neither debate nor discussion.

Nobody, and I mean, nobody knows what he will say or do. He's a loose cannon - he's where senile meets half-crazy. That's what you get with a nearly 80 year old fossil - the oldest nominated presidential candidate in history. This old dude farts dust. We will make a choice to do better than a half-crazy, senile old dust farter.

Maybe think about stopping useless comments like a twit. If you want to actually participate in the conversation, bring something to add that isn't crap.

Did you read my post? The "argument" was already there, you must have missed it. Early in his video, he seems to make sense. Then later in the video, he turns into a biased anti-democrat. Blatantly and obviously. Read it again, it's all there. Feel free to ask questions here or DM me if you are still confused by any of this.

Who is this turd? Watch a little bit and he'll appear to make a lot of sense... watch more and he reveals himself as just another anti-democrat blaming weirdo. I'd be willing to bet he has a bunch of cats and no kids.

Ah, finally an attempt at conversation. That is a welcome change. I don't back terrorists. Why would you claim that I do?

That was a bad attempt at misdirection, and more blah from you. (Perhaps you've been drinking and projecting?) Back to the question I asked. Why are you and your basket of muttonheads backing Israel? What's the plan?

I originally suggested (it's all above for those wiling to scroll back), that it was a WWE wrestling move. Not with "fake blood from a prop" but with a staged real razor and real blood on the ear. As the evidence is rolled out, that doesn't appear to be the case. It still can't be 100% disregarded - but it is looking to be unlikely at this point. After waiting for the FBI to release (at least some of) their investigation findings - It would appear that it is still a legitimate question as to if it was a bullet or fragments from a bullet from the "shooter's" rifle actually hit the ex-president. This could be an important distinction. As I've been saying all along, we'll have to wait for the FBI's investigation to reveal more facts. We'll get closer... (The biggest problem I see right now is politicians interfering with the FBI investigations. I trust the FBI - and basically nobody trusts politicians. That's not an accident. It's based on many decades of experience.)

Yah, all that crap you said above as all BS. Child level dumb. But I do wonder - why are you and your clown show muppets backing Israel? What's the plan?

Today's earlier update from the FBI confirmed what Wray had already said. It was either a bullet or debris from a bullet. It's still the same thing we've already been discussing here. Not a factual thing has changed. (The GOP did pressure the FBI into releasing this updated statement - except the FBI didn't change anything in their 'updated' statement. Nor should they have.) But it does seem to placate those with limited critical thinking capacity. Which is, I would guess, the GOP is after.

I didn't see any debris from the video either... but the FBI investigation revealed bits of metal debris on the stage. So, you may be unsure what to believe. Your eyes viewing an internet video the FBI's forensic investigation team's findings after nearly a week of investigation and interviews with hundreds of eyewitnesses. I'm leaning pretty heavily toward the FBI on this one.

... and then you jump in and contribute 4 lines of insults. Bad - just bad. I would invite you to the discussion - as this is a "discussion" board. Something you should understand. Maybe get your head out of your ass and start contributing to the discussion instead of making useless insults.

What's happening isn't really about "what the Olympics are turning into." It really isn't. It's more about the goal of the Olympics to mirror what the sporting world is doing in order to stay in touch. To stay relevant, to keep getting ad sponsors, and to keep existing are the end goals for those behind the Olympics effort. The Olympics have always been somewhat of a mirror of what was currently popular in sporting events. That hasn't changed.

That sounds like at least two different questions. And, no, we're not moving on from either of them until our evidence guides us there.

Hold on their Mspart... who cleared what up, exactly? An Xwitter post from someone named "OSINTdefender"... and you just believe that post? Whoever OSINTdefender is, they are just some rando to me. Nothing has been cleared up. The FBI has disclosed that multiple metal fragments were found on the stage Trump was standing on. It's not a stretch at all to think one of those fragments grazed his ear. In fact, it's more a stretch to think it was a bullet. (By the way, thanks for the effort at actual discussion. I appreciate that. The others here are little more than gnats.)

All true. Basic and simple points. But this contributes nothing to the point of the thread. Why the SS director resigned is an entirely different topic. But it's good to hear your opinion on that matter.

Yes, I do wonder sometimes. Homeless people I see on the street or under bridges, etc. Thugs who start trouble with other thugs after bar close for no good reason. Older people who are struggling to maintain a basic quality of life. And also - you, Scoot, and Offthemat. Just angry little pukes who are looking for a fight instead of a conversation.

BZZZZZZ. INCORRECT. That is NOT "critical thinking." Feel free to try again.