braves121

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-donated-to-kamala-harris-twice-as-private-citizen-2020-8?amp&utm_source=reddit.com Kamala Harris is DJT approved he has donated to her a couple of times

My guy you literally typed out and posted that trump will get pardoned but Biden will not. What are you on about?

Don’t think the really even need too you can see everything he believes in his twitter but sure hope so

So in this situation you yourself made up trump and Biden did the same thing but Biden goes to jail? The mental gymnastics is crazy

You mean like when he returned them compared to trump hid them in a bathroom people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones

You have no idea what you are talking about and lack reading comprehension i blame lead poisoning

Well good news the SC rules presidents have immunity especially in this specific example so he’s not a criminal

she ruled it unconstitutional because she says the AG can’t appoint special counsels even though that’s been happening for 30 years she ruled that the no statute grants an attorney general authority to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecution nail power wielded by special council smith. where is the difference in our 2 statements? What is so different that what you said is nothing close to what i said?

Thanks for reiterating everything i just wrote. That’s also not the same as no vetting lmao

I’ll educate ya a little she ruled it unconstitutional because she says the AG can’t appoint special counsels even though that’s been happening for 30 years. Wow this means that even Robert hur and his report were unconstitutional

What crime has Biden committed?

Do you not read the news or documents people put out to the media lmao?

There is a 2 tiered justice system for sure if any of us plebs on the board had classified documents laying out we would be rotting in prison but the person who appointed the judge presiding over his case has no repercussions this country is such a joke lmao

Her decision to dismiss the case had nothing to with vetting? She stated the appointment in itself was unconstitutional even though it has been settled law for 30 plus years.

A judge that was appointed by the defendant throwing out the case and disregarding 30 years of settled law is certainly a choice. This opens up to hunters conviction getting thrown out due to that prosecutor being a special counsel as well

Quick google search shows people are against the fact that this bill has the verbiage that it doesn’t matter if the offender does not know if the victim is a minor or not. This means that if you go to an 18+ venue, pick up a girl who got in with a fake id, sleep with her, you are going to be hit with a felony and 4 years in prison for something a venue should have made sure. Not really seeing lgbt be the main people complaining. The lawmakers just amended it to not include that anyway so ur link is a nothing burger as non lgbt people prefer the amended version anyway

Do you have any data showing lgbt people have higher arrests for sex crimes?

So what good would introducing a bill that makes an already illegal act illegal? It’s an oxymoron and pointless. There are plenty of issues that congress can actually make better but they waste time introducing legislation that was already signed into law almost 30 years ago it’s why people say the right can not govern. Before anyone tries to do whataboutism the left can also not govern

That law was already passed in 1996 lmao it’s already against the law for non citizens to vote in federal elections

When a public school only require posting of religious documents of one religion, that is establishing a religion. This will be struck down in the courts as unconstitutional

https://www.npr.org/2024/06/27/nx-s1-5021971/oklahoma-state-superintendent-says-schools-must-assimilate-the-bible-into-curriculum here is no paywall, i mention the superintendent of OK making public schools teach from the vibe because it’s related to the Ten Commandments law. So every person who voted yes for the law in LA was gop, this superintendent in another state forcing the Bible is gop, trump who is gop supports the Ten Commandments bill, and AZ gop introduced the same bill. So 4 different groups od republicans in 4 different we states support this but you say it’s not a party issue?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof aka separation of church and state

here is another example, the leader of the gop actually endorses this bill https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-supports-louisiana-ten-commandments-law-in-schools-evangelicals/

I have given you 2 other examples of republicans in different states introducing or mandating the same or similar bills

So a party passing an unconstitutional anti 1A bill isn’t going too far?