Jump to content

braves121

Members
  • Posts

    675
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by braves121

  1. We are the party of law and order!!! Oh wait our guys a convicted felon? Nvm Back the blue! Except for the fbi defund them! my body my choice!! Except for women wanting to get abortions Lock her up!!! We shouldn’t use the legal system to go after political opponents we are the party of small government! Gives the president the most power anyone has ever had in this country they say one thing and mean other
  2. Same thing as a ruiling
  3. There is no wording about congress at all regarding an official act. Official act" for the purposes of Section 201(b) and (c) is defined to mean: "Any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official's official capacity, or in such official's place of trust or profit.” https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-2044-particular-elements in the ruling they just use the words “ core constitutional power” but according to this ruling the president has immunity so he could theoretically sign an executive order giving him extra powers and legally there’s nothing could be done because that had nothing to do with congress it was done by executive In theory Biden could sign an EO suspending habeas corpus and that’s within his new immunity rights
  4. I think it’s more so that trumps lawyers argued that assassinating a political rival is an official act and now the sc rules that as an official act is immune to law.just using the same arguments trumps lawyers used for this
  5. They also stated that the plebes who are experts in their fields are no longer qualified to regulate government agencies such ans the fda and osha, only people who are elected like those who couldn’t name the 3 branches of the government. Asbestos in water and child labor are back on the menu for us plebes gotta love it
  6. When the party of small government applauds at giving the government even more power
  7. What would you call it when a leader gets a dangerous amount of power and is unable to be held accountable?
  8. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked Sauer, “If the president decides that his rival is a corrupt person and he orders the military to assassinate him, is that within his official acts to which he has immunity?” “That could well be an official act,” Sauer responded. what is the much broader context that trumps lawyers were using?
  9. This decision opens a can of worms. Trumps lawyers literally argued that political assassinations could be views as official acts so why are you acting that it is an impossibility? Theoretically this does in fact make the president a monarch because he has immunity with “ official acts” Biden could go ahead and have the fbi lock up trump for any reason and say it’s an official act. Biden could say is suspending all elections as an official act. It’s not about R v D it’s about recognizing this is no good lol
  10. An official act is going to be whatever the lawyers say is an official act we have seen this happen before in other countries…
  11. So Biden can not be prosecuted for the border stuff like everyone’s calling for now since they were all official acts correct?
  12. Conversely trumps lawyers argued that ordering an assignation of a political opponent would be an official act, Biden has an opportunity to try something
  13. The court really didn’t rule on anything they just are punting it because it was presumed every president has immunity. Now they will need to distinguish in courts what they believe is official and unofficial acts. In my opinion the overturning of chevron and the fact that the SC ruled that they can receive kickbacks for rulings present far greater implications for the country as a whole than this case
  14. how was he not a co defendant in the law suit?
  15. the right when bill gates and bill clinton are on epsteins list: LOCK THEM UP THOSE PEDOPHILES the right when Trump is on epsteins list, mutliple photos of them and ghislane maxwell together, and was listed as a co defendant on a child rape case: he did nothing wrong
  16. I thought everyone on here was a judicial system genius thanks to the trump trial. the law suit was still filed, she withdrew for whatever reason we will never know but the guy is known to pay hush money so. The fact that it was withdrawn does not change the fact that he was named as a co defendant. the legal filings are all still there as documentation.
  17. When the party of law and order and “protecting the children” does mental gymnastics to defend a guy who is a known Epstein associate and a known co defendant on a child rape case with a convicted pedophile lmao
  18. I sense the goal posts are now moving lol see above response
  19. I just gave multiple articles reporting on it. that kind of is the definition of the media reporting on this. The victim withdrew her suit probably for a multitude of reasons just like a majority of rape victims never report. Trump is no stranger at throwing money at people to get them to be quite so that's another possibility along with all the other dangers of bringing millionaires to court, don't act so naïve. It doesn't change the fact Trump was in fact a co defendant in a child rape case with epstein himself
  20. is the legal document that was filed an opinion piece? the file that you have to download is the legal suit document
  21. https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Johnson_TrumpEpstein_Lawsuit.pdf https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped https://www.scribd.com/document/326057168/Jane-Doe-Declaration-as-Filed https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/04/donald-trump-teenage-rape-accusations-lawsuit-dropped https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/11/3/13501364/trump-rape-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation Take your pick
  22. https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-26b6-dda3-afd8-b6fe46f40000 yes you are correct here it is
  23. These people have been claiming for years about this stuff on the laptop and say they have copies and proof yet never show proof lmao if its not disinformation sack up and post the evidence you say you have
  24. Asylum is a legal way of immigration it doesn't matter if you think its chaos or not, it is a legal way of immigrating here. Biden is decreasing the amount of asylum claims so less people will come than before this and you are still mad. Sounds you are more so against immigration as a whole whether it be legal or not. Fastest way to stop illegal immigration is to use E verify and not hire undocumented people but both sides of the aisle prefer cheap labor so that won't happen
  25. Lmao if they believed the stuff they spew they would release it. Its like saying lock her up then not doing anything for 4 years and saying you will put out a healthcare plan better than ACA and never bring it up again these people lie lol
×
×
  • Create New...