braves121

If anyone on this board could in good faith explain how the VP for the current president deciding to run when the incumbent decides to not run anymore is more of a threat to our democracy than a president who lost an election having slates of fake electors and calling to find more votes I will never post again

Shit posts instead of tackling the point sounds about right lmao how can people on the right call us a republic and not a democracy yet are crying about our democracy? Pls make it make sense i want to know

Cool that still doesn’t change the fact that people On this board post contradictory things like we are not a democracy but our democracy is threatened

What hasn’t she done as AG? DJT donated to her reelection campaign for AG so he thought she was being tough on crime. What didn’t she do that is the responsibility of VP? The VPs job is to break a tie in the senate lol can you share some things that Pence did as VP to compare what Harris has done?

lol for pointing out someone contradicting their own beliefs? Guy says we are not a democracy but posts tweets about how our democracy is doomed

Every primary voter who voted for Biden also voted for Harris since she was his vp. Hard to imagine ever single Biden voter is disenfranchised and upset that his vp got his endorsement. The DNC hasn’t even happened and Biden has not accepted the nomination yet no one knows what the plan to pick the candidate is

So why would you post about a link something being a threat to our democracy when we are a republic?

A lot of people on this board would argue we are actually a republic not a democracy

Why would you place blame from blm riots on Biden? He wasn’t even the democrat candidate at the time

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-donated-to-kamala-harris-twice-as-private-citizen-2020-8?amp&utm_source=reddit.com Kamala Harris is DJT approved he has donated to her a couple of times

My guy you literally typed out and posted that trump will get pardoned but Biden will not. What are you on about?

Don’t think the really even need too you can see everything he believes in his twitter but sure hope so

So in this situation you yourself made up trump and Biden did the same thing but Biden goes to jail? The mental gymnastics is crazy

You mean like when he returned them compared to trump hid them in a bathroom people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones

You have no idea what you are talking about and lack reading comprehension i blame lead poisoning

Well good news the SC rules presidents have immunity especially in this specific example so he’s not a criminal

she ruled it unconstitutional because she says the AG can’t appoint special counsels even though that’s been happening for 30 years she ruled that the no statute grants an attorney general authority to appoint a federal officer with the kind of prosecution nail power wielded by special council smith. where is the difference in our 2 statements? What is so different that what you said is nothing close to what i said?

Thanks for reiterating everything i just wrote. That’s also not the same as no vetting lmao

I’ll educate ya a little she ruled it unconstitutional because she says the AG can’t appoint special counsels even though that’s been happening for 30 years. Wow this means that even Robert hur and his report were unconstitutional

What crime has Biden committed?

Do you not read the news or documents people put out to the media lmao?

There is a 2 tiered justice system for sure if any of us plebs on the board had classified documents laying out we would be rotting in prison but the person who appointed the judge presiding over his case has no repercussions this country is such a joke lmao

Her decision to dismiss the case had nothing to with vetting? She stated the appointment in itself was unconstitutional even though it has been settled law for 30 plus years.

A judge that was appointed by the defendant throwing out the case and disregarding 30 years of settled law is certainly a choice. This opens up to hunters conviction getting thrown out due to that prosecutor being a special counsel as well

Quick google search shows people are against the fact that this bill has the verbiage that it doesn’t matter if the offender does not know if the victim is a minor or not. This means that if you go to an 18+ venue, pick up a girl who got in with a fake id, sleep with her, you are going to be hit with a felony and 4 years in prison for something a venue should have made sure. Not really seeing lgbt be the main people complaining. The lawmakers just amended it to not include that anyway so ur link is a nothing burger as non lgbt people prefer the amended version anyway