mspart

He's a player all right. mspart

There are no charges against Joe, he is the sitting President. That will come from the impeachment committee if they ever get that far. I am talking about election interference in government and social media's attempts to stifle information that probably would have changed the election results as noted by the article I posted saying 1 in 6 Biden voters would have changed their vote if they had known about this. You can deny all you want. The laptop is Hunter's and implicates him in federal offenses and implicates his father that the impeachment committtee is looking into along with other information gathered as a result of the laptop. It is good that Hunter is being held accountable is it not? mspart

It means nothing to you because that is what you want it to mean. mspart

Do that and both of us will be in trouble. We also cannot change ownership of firearms without filling out some form or other. I expect these will get found unconstitutional soon. mspart

What has been verified? 1. The laptop is Hunter Biden's. 2. The info on the laptop is not Russian Disinformation. 3. The information on the laptop shows Hunter's corruption 4. Twitter suspended NYPs account based on their article which showed the above true. 5. Twitter took similar action with other accounts that retweeted the NYP story. 6. Hunter gun possession while using drugs, a federal offense. 7. Hunger using drugs which is technically a federal offense. 8. Hunter's financial shennigans. Truth is Plasi, the information on that laptop has been verified to be true and all the above is a result of the information or the result of the story describing the information. To your assertion that Twitter couldn't censor the article, that is true, but they did not allow it on their site due to government pressure. The NYP published the article but Twitter actively used its power to discredit, not disseminate it, and call it Russian disinformation. Right before the election. The election where 1 of 6 Biden voters said if they had known about this they would not have voted for Biden. mspart

At the hearing with Presidents of MIT, Harvard and Penn, were deplorable. https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/06/investing/bill-ackman-harvard-penn-antisemitism/index.html In response to Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik asking whether calling for the genocide of Jews would violate Penn’s code of conduct, Penn President Magill said: “It is a context dependent decision.” Stefanik responded with shock. “That’s your testimony today? Calling for the genocide of Jews is dependent on the context? That is not bullying or harassment? This is the easiest question to answer yes for,” Stefanik said. The other two Presidents responded to similar questions from Stefanik the same way. Now if the question had been about genocide of blacks, gays, or trans folks, it would not have depended on context or if actual actions had happened as a result. We have all seen this. You say something bad about any of those groups you are rushed off campus. But with Jews, it is context based and no resulting actions happened from the speech. Be consistent. If not, then stop with all this safe space crap, free speech as long as it is not against favored minorities crap. The hyporcrisy is evident here and these three should be fired immediately. mspart

Sounds like good news for Musk. mspart

We can't get those here in WA anymore. mspart

Of course he does. It is free speech when the right people do it. It is censor-able and rightly so when the wrong people do it. NYP puts out an article in Oct 2020 about the laptop, which has since all been verified. The twitter files are all about how government officials contacted Twitter to get rid of this stuff, and Twitter took out NYPs account. Anyone that posted anything from that NYP article on Twitter was either banned or censored. Twitter would not allow discussion of it. The letter from the 51 officials (or ex officials) was just pushing harder on this construct and gave cover because the letter implicated Russia interference. Of course that was not the case. As Morell said in jross's post, he did this because he wanted Biden elected. If this whole construct does not equate to election interference, it would be difficult to say what would. mspart

Wow. So why were they removed from competition before? Waste of time and effort. mspart

That's what we get for assuming. mspart

Ah yes the perks of being the assistant. Like the asst is the right hand and the head coach is the left hand. mspart

So my assumption was correct. Johnny D ( I assume Yianni) will go against Lee. That was my assumption. I said nothing about results. mspart

You got my attention!! mspart

So who is johnny D? mspart

I choose where to waste my time. Such a quiz is not one of them. But this board is wasting time, I have to agree. But it is fun nonetheless. mspart

You and me ionel. You and me. mspart

Yeah maybe. mspart

If you read the words and believe him. So here are his words again regarding retribution: Hannity - We almost have to go to a break. I want to go back to this one issue, though, because the media has been focused on this and attacking you. Under no circumstances, you are promising America tonight, you would never abuse power as retribution against anybody. Trump - Except for day one. Hannity -Except for? Trump -He’s going crazy. Except for day one. Hannity -Meaning? Trump -I want to close the border and I want to drill. ... Hannity -That’s not retribution. Trump -I’m going to be… He keeps… We love this guy. He says you’re not going to be a dictator, are you? I said, no, no, no. Other than day one. We’re closing the border and we’re drilling, drilling, drilling. After that, I’m not a dictator. Okay? Hannity - That sounds to me like you’re going back to the policies when you were president. Is that clear enough Vak. Read and understand and believe him. Hannity even says after that that's not retribution but going back to the policies Trump had when he was president. Read and understand and believe him. Where do you read retribution in there? Where do you read he is going to be a dictator in there? Let me interpret for you. He will close the border and drill to get retribution on what Biden did to his policies. And he will do that with EO's just like Biden did to get rid of those policies. Clear as can be. You said all you have to do is read and believe him. He's saying right there and you are not believing him. TDS runs deep. mspart

So now you are saying Trump is right in there with Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, and Idi Amin? TDS on steroids. There is no way this happens. It doesn't happen. He showed no such inclination before. This is grasping at straws with no evidence to back it up. mspart

I think this talk of him being or becoming a dictator are way overblown. It is TDS on steroids. He has never dictated anything as President that anyone can bring up. Unless you count EOs. He did use them. Just like Obama and Biden used them. Just like Bush. Every President uses them. So unless there is other evidence, I say this is overblown hysteria by hysterical people. mspart

Yes, it does seems strange no one is challenging Richards. Good luck to Richards and winner of D ( Yianni I assume) and Lee. mspart

Marianetti of Illinois Urbana. Beat McIravy in the finals. Great match. mspart

Looks like Cox beat Moore in 2021 WTT finals 4-0 and 5-0. Not blowouts but unscored on. mspart

You are the one that chose to vent on the chat board. So I chatted. It was unwelcome. Which really is quite strange on a chat board. Thoughts and prayers to you neutral. Just kidding. Or not. mspart