jross

I’ve been wondering, what if we could analyze our comments to understand our personalities? A tool could examine what we write here, looking at our words to create a profile. It might show if we’re calm, critical, or thorough, perhaps linking to traits like the Big Five. With AI, it could find patterns we’d overlook. It wouldn’t be exact, since online behavior differs from real life, but it’s an intriguing concept.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 237(a)(4)(B) does not violate the Constitution. This is part of the United States Code that outlines the grounds for deporting green card holders. Text of INA Section 237(a)(4)(B) Section 237(a)(4)(B) - Terrorist Activities: “Any alien who has engaged, is engaged, or at any time after admission engages in any terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) of this title) is deportable.” Cross-Reference: “Terrorist activity” is defined in INA Section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) [8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv)], including acts like providing “material support” to a terrorist organization (e.g., Hamas), which can cover funding, logistics, or even speech that aids their goals. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1227

Khalil is a leader of Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD). He was a lead organizer and negotiator during the Gaza Solidarity Encampment. This protest disrupted campus operations to demand divestment and a Gaza ceasefire. He was in direct talks with university administrators, making him a public face of the movement. CUAD members broke into the Hamilton Hall building, smashed a glass door, and barricaded it with furniture and bike locks, renaming it “Hind’s Hall” to honor a Palestinian child killed in Gaza. CUAD members chant "From the river to the sea." CUAD flyers with pro Hamas at rallies that Kahlil organized... He was on TV and didn't condemn what CUAD was doing... Don't care if he is "charged" with a crime. He is a security risk and not welcome here.

but… but… midwit

Ooze

Quadruple the police in the high crime blocks where the gun violence happens. Pay the cops well.

of course

Which president actually wore a diaper? I believe in subsidizing college with taxpayer dollars. I've voted Democrat before.

I believe taxpayers should subsidize college education.

True

All the moderates I know are pumped about the transparency and cuts to spending. There is a concern to where the mistakes are impactful and understanding to gov workers but they support it overall.

Letter delivery is dead. USPS is costing taxpayers a fortune in pensions. USPS bends over backwards for Amazon because it has no work otherwise. $65 billion lost in 10 years. Shut it down.

I’m asking because I don’t know anyone local who’s losing sleep over Russia or Ukraine. Just got back from my annual fishing trip with high school buddies (all in our 40s) plus one’s dad, uncle, and their crew (70s)—a mix of Dems, Indies, and Repubs. All they want is peace; the rest is just noise. Inflation and costs? Yep they care. But the state of foreign countries? Nobody gives a damn. So if seven of us. Real people, not poll stats, don’t care. Why should I care what a C-grade pollster’s selling?

What's the scoop on Ipsos polls? They have a Trump blind spot in election polls. Why? Who knows? They state they weigh respondents to match the census while they do not publish the raw numbers across demographics and party lines.

Technology steals presence.

Yes Trump lies, exaggerates, uses rhetoric, etc. Which example do you refer? And midwits keep midwitting...

We have a problem with loserthink and midwit behavior. Moderately smart people overcomplicate simple truths and nitpick. If I say "Asians are good at math," the midwit says... "Well, it depends on what you mean by 'Asians?' Are we talking East Asians, South Asians, or Southeast Asians? Do you mean arithmetic, calculus, or theoretical math?" The midwit overthinks and fixates on semantics... "Actually, not all Asians are good at math. My friend from South Korea failed algebra..." When we should focus on whether the larger pattern is true and why that is. AND this is what's happening in this conversation... "THE greatest vs ONE OF the greatest vs Great." I do this too... calling it to those doing it here.

Trump messed up his Covid response in the first term. And he is an asshole. Funny. But an asshole. Can't be THE greatest. He can be one of the greatest depending on his second term execution. Starting out on fire.

I stand by the claim that Biden was claimed as one of the greatest ever, and this topic has been proven.

The first 10 laid the ground work for Words are Tyranny. It shows how a biased survey was used as a foundation for MSM to associate Biden with Greatness. The next set shows one small sampling of how this is directly manifested across social media. I shouldn't need to post 1000 examples of people referring to Biden as great in the MSM and Social media to prove what some of already know. You are not following logic... and that's a strong signal of a certain party favor...

Alright, let’s roll with the wrestling comp. Ronald Reagan is Kyle Dake on the political mat. Dake swept four NCAA titles. Reagan swept 49 states in the election. Biden is ranked ahead of Regan... so better than Dake? Imagine the top 46 wrestlers from all NCAA history, every weight, every era. Biden at 14th isn’t topping Sanderson, but he’s in the mix... think Aaron Brooks or Ed Banach (3 titles, 73 pins). One of the greatest! There are 33 qualifiers at the NCAAs. Biden is better than 32 other presidents. Being better than 32 others at the NCAA means you stand on top of the podium.

You are smarter than this. I showed how to admit when one is wrong just today in a post to Fishbane. But you... My goodness. We're telling you that Biden's Great Presidency was pushed as a narrative on 'us.' Because that was what we 'felt' when reading newlines and listening to media. Yea there were criticisms... You can't be more stubbornly wrong to dismiss what we're saying here and backing up with data. You are acting like a .... democrat. Not the moderate kind.

Semantics. It's not research on 'transgender mice.' It is research on the affects of giving male hormones to female mice in support of human transgender care. $2.5M to study how testosterone impacts ovarian function in female mice. Review the history of payouts https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10619517 Reproductive Consequences of Steroid Hormone Administration Recent data estimates 1.4 million transgender adults and 150,000 transgender adolescents live in the United States, many of whom are on cross-sex hormone therapy with estradiol or testosterone (T)... Project started May 1, 2019 with end date of April 2025. Payouts of $500K annual over multiple years... The study focused on administering steroid hormones like testosterone to female mice and observing the effects on their reproductive systems. This aligns with efforts to model the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), such as testosterone use in transgender men, to understand potential impacts on fertility...

THE POINT IS THE LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION of 'Biden to Great' and 'Trump to Worst'. Get it?