mspart Posted March 13 Posted March 13 I don't think so. I have enough expertise to say you can tell a man's skeleton from 5000 years ago. Heck they identified Lucy from further back than that. No, asked why everyone was laughing at him afterall, he had a PhD and they didn't. He was the expert and they weren't He was wrong on more than just the gender thing. He misspoke a lot. mspart
mspart Posted March 13 Posted March 13 https://www.foxnews.com/media/audience-laughs-professor-telling-riley-gaines-difference-male-female-bone-structure A video went viral of a confrontation during the Leadership Institute event when Gaines asked senior lecturer at the school’s anthropology department Gabby Yearwood, "If you were to dig up two humans one hundred years from now, both man and woman, could you tell the difference, strictly off of bones?" "No!" the professor replied as the room erupted in laughter. The professor then responded to the laughter with shock, wondering how he could be doubted when he was "the expert in the room." "Have any of you been to anthropological sites? Have any of you studied biological anthropology? I’m just saying, I’ve got over 150 years of data, I’m just curious as to why I’m being laughed at," he said before later declaring, "I have a PhD!" The different bone structure between male and female humans has been a mainstay of anthropological study and forensics. He had a PhD and didn't know this basic thing from basic anatomy. He not only made the mistake but fought to have it be accepted. So he doubled down on it, knowing he was wrong and pulling the expert card and the PhD card. That only works when no one knows the truth. When everyone knew the truth, he just looked like more of a tool and a charlatan. mspart
red viking Posted March 14 Posted March 14 1 hour ago, mspart said: https://www.foxnews.com/media/audience-laughs-professor-telling-riley-gaines-difference-male-female-bone-structure A video went viral of a confrontation during the Leadership Institute event when Gaines asked senior lecturer at the school’s anthropology department Gabby Yearwood, "If you were to dig up two humans one hundred years from now, both man and woman, could you tell the difference, strictly off of bones?" "No!" the professor replied as the room erupted in laughter. The professor then responded to the laughter with shock, wondering how he could be doubted when he was "the expert in the room." "Have any of you been to anthropological sites? Have any of you studied biological anthropology? I’m just saying, I’ve got over 150 years of data, I’m just curious as to why I’m being laughed at," he said before later declaring, "I have a PhD!" The different bone structure between male and female humans has been a mainstay of anthropological study and forensics. He had a PhD and didn't know this basic thing from basic anatomy. He not only made the mistake but fought to have it be accepted. So he doubled down on it, knowing he was wrong and pulling the expert card and the PhD card. That only works when no one knows the truth. When everyone knew the truth, he just looked like more of a tool and a charlatan. mspart If he knew he was wrongg, he'd be very unlikely to make that proclamation. It was inevitable that he was gonna be corrected and embarrassed. Unlikely to be dumb enough to knowingly go down that road. Thats MUCH dumber than the incorrect answer itself. Scientific community doesn't accept that stuff, unlike the winger trumptards who don't care what u say as long as it supports the winger agenda. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
mspart Posted March 18 Posted March 18 yeah, he was just a left wing tool that thought his credentials mattered more than the common knowlege known all around him. mspart
mspart Posted March 18 Posted March 18 As a result of his arrogance, everyone in the room laughed at him. You would think he would figure it out right then and there and say, I got that wrong, assuming he is the magnanimous professor you wish him to be. But he doubled down on his idiocy and was laughed at more. But he was doing what he could to uphold the narrative that a man can become a woman and vice versa. That is what he was/is a slave to. Talk about an anti-scientific scientist. mspart
red viking Posted March 18 Posted March 18 50 minutes ago, mspart said: As a result of his arrogance, everyone in the room laughed at him. You would think he would figure it out right then and there and say, I got that wrong, assuming he is the magnanimous professor you wish him to be. But he doubled down on his idiocy and was laughed at more. But he was doing what he could to uphold the narrative that a man can become a woman and vice versa. That is what he was/is a slave to. Talk about an anti-scientific scientist. mspart He's not going to realize he's wrong simply because students mock him. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
mspart Posted March 18 Posted March 18 1 hour ago, red viking said: He's not going to realize he's wrong simply because students mock him. Then when will he? He is an idiot. Deserves to be defrocked. Take away his PhD for idiocy. You don't get any dumber than this. A guy with a PhD that makes a mistake as you say, should be able to recognize it immediately. He is a tool of the tranny left paradigm and goes down with it. mspart
red viking Posted March 19 Posted March 19 2 hours ago, mspart said: Then when will he? He is an idiot. Deserves to be defrocked. Take away his PhD for idiocy. You don't get any dumber than this. A guy with a PhD that makes a mistake as you say, should be able to recognize it immediately. He is a tool of the tranny left paradigm and goes down with it. mspart He had to look it up to realize it. Didn't have time to do that on the spot. Like I said, he's not a physical anthropologist so he was somewhat outside his area. You can't fire a professor for making a mistaken answer in a debate. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
mspart Posted March 19 Posted March 19 This is pretty sad excusing the behavior of a professor when what he says everyone knows is wrong and definitely unscientific. mspart
red viking Posted March 19 Posted March 19 14 hours ago, mspart said: This is pretty sad excusing the behavior of a professor when what he says everyone knows is wrong and definitely unscientific. mspart I'm sure he got some harsh words from his department chair and was very embarrassed later on. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
Lipdrag Posted March 19 Posted March 19 19 minutes ago, red viking said: I'm sure he got some harsh words from his department chair and was very embarrassed later on. That's pretty funny. People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.
red viking Posted March 19 Posted March 19 5 minutes ago, Lipdrag said: That's pretty funny. 110% guaranteed. Fellow scientists hate it when scientists claim to know something when they don't. They lose respect every time that happens. Opposite of politicians. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
Lipdrag Posted March 20 Posted March 20 9 hours ago, red viking said: 110% guaranteed. Fellow scientists hate it when scientists claim to know something when they don't. They lose respect every time that happens. Opposite of politicians. Except for gender and climate "scientists" and their department heads. They double down on what they don't know but love to proclaim. 1 People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.
red viking Posted March 20 Posted March 20 46 minutes ago, Lipdrag said: Except for gender and climate "scientists" and their department heads. They double down on what they don't know but love to proclaim. Climate scientists are generally excellent. Manmade global warming is WAY beyond having been proven w 110% certainty. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
JimmySpeaks Posted March 20 Posted March 20 1 hour ago, red viking said: Climate scientists are generally excellent. Manmade global warming is WAY beyond having been proven w 110% certainty. Now prove when we’re all going to die because of it. LIVING the dream in the GREATEST COUNTRY on the planet!!!!
ionel Posted March 20 Posted March 20 12 hours ago, red viking said: 110% guaranteed. Fellow scientists hate it when scientists claim to know something when they don't. They lose respect every time that happens. Opposite of politicians. Any true scientist knows there are no guarantees and any mathematical scientists know there is no such thing as 110% truth. So what do we call these folks who claim to know something they don't and claim to be scientists when they aren't? .
Lipdrag Posted March 20 Posted March 20 9 hours ago, ionel said: Any true scientist knows there are no guarantees and any mathematical scientists know there is no such thing as 110% truth. So what do we call these folks who claim to know something they don't and claim to be scientists when they aren't? Geologists. People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.
red viking Posted March 20 Posted March 20 9 hours ago, ionel said: Any true scientist knows there are no guarantees and any mathematical scientists know there is no such thing as 110% truth. So what do we call these folks who claim to know something they don't and claim to be scientists when they aren't? Ok. I was exaggerating. How about 99.9999% proven to be more accurate. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
red viking Posted March 20 Posted March 20 10 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said: Now prove when we’re all going to die because of it. Zero scientists have said that. Another strawman and example of your constant dishonesty Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
Caveira Posted March 20 Posted March 20 20 minutes ago, red viking said: Zero scientists have said that. Another strawman and example of your constant dishonesty Zero is a small number James Lovelock Independent scientist, environmental thinker “Billions of us will die…” 2. James Hansen Former head of NASA GISS “We’re toast if we don’t…” 3. Johan Rockström Director, Potsdam Institute “A 3 degree world is not livable.” 4. Stefan Rahmstorf Potsdam Institute researcher “An existential threat to human civilization.” 5. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber Founder, Potsdam Institute World may be “fatally wounded.” 6. William J Ripple Co-author, “World Scientists’ Warning” “Life on planet Earth is under siege.” 7. Christopher Wolf Co-author with Ripple “Uncharted territory… time is up.” 8. Tim Lenton University of Exeter Warns of “tipping points” causing irreversible shifts 9. Peter Kalmus Climate scientist & activist Has warned of “collapse” risks (public statements referenced) 10. Will Steffen Former IGBP director Helped warn of potential “planetary emergency” framing 11. Kevin Anderson Climate policy expert Known for warning of “incompatible with organized society” scenarios 12. Sir David King Former UK Chief Scientific Adviser Has called climate change a “far greater threat than terrorism” 13. Julia K Steinberger IPCC contributor Warns of systemic collapse risks (cited in climate warnings list) 14. Lonnie Thompson Ice core researcher Warned impacts could be “abrupt and catastrophic” (widely cited) 15. Ove Hoegh-Guldberg Coral reef expert Ecosystems “unrecognisable” at high warming 16. Lesley Hughes Climate impacts researcher Major ecological collapse scenarios at 3°C 17. Michael E Mann “Hockey stick” graph Warns of “dangerous” and potentially catastrophic warming 18. Wallace Smith Broecker Early climate pioneer Warned climate system could shift abruptly (referenced in literature) 19. Michael Oppenheimer IPCC contributor Warns of “catastrophic” unknown risks 20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change World’s top scientific authority “Final warning… brink of irreversible damage”
red viking Posted March 20 Posted March 20 (edited) 1 hour ago, Caveira said: Zero is a small number James Lovelock Independent scientist, environmental thinker “Billions of us will die…” 2. James Hansen Former head of NASA GISS “We’re toast if we don’t…” 3. Johan Rockström Director, Potsdam Institute “A 3 degree world is not livable.” 4. Stefan Rahmstorf Potsdam Institute researcher “An existential threat to human civilization.” 5. Hans Joachim Schellnhuber Founder, Potsdam Institute World may be “fatally wounded.” 6. William J Ripple Co-author, “World Scientists’ Warning” “Life on planet Earth is under siege.” 7. Christopher Wolf Co-author with Ripple “Uncharted territory… time is up.” 8. Tim Lenton University of Exeter Warns of “tipping points” causing irreversible shifts 9. Peter Kalmus Climate scientist & activist Has warned of “collapse” risks (public statements referenced) 10. Will Steffen Former IGBP director Helped warn of potential “planetary emergency” framing 11. Kevin Anderson Climate policy expert Known for warning of “incompatible with organized society” scenarios 12. Sir David King Former UK Chief Scientific Adviser Has called climate change a “far greater threat than terrorism” 13. Julia K Steinberger IPCC contributor Warns of systemic collapse risks (cited in climate warnings list) 14. Lonnie Thompson Ice core researcher Warned impacts could be “abrupt and catastrophic” (widely cited) 15. Ove Hoegh-Guldberg Coral reef expert Ecosystems “unrecognisable” at high warming 16. Lesley Hughes Climate impacts researcher Major ecological collapse scenarios at 3°C 17. Michael E Mann “Hockey stick” graph Warns of “dangerous” and potentially catastrophic warming 18. Wallace Smith Broecker Early climate pioneer Warned climate system could shift abruptly (referenced in literature) 19. Michael Oppenheimer IPCC contributor Warns of “catastrophic” unknown risks 20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change World’s top scientific authority “Final warning… brink of irreversible damage” NONE of them said that were all going to die. Are any of them even PhD climatologists? Edited March 20 by red viking Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
Caveira Posted March 20 Posted March 20 34 minutes ago, red viking said: NONE of them said that were all going to die. Are any of them even PhD climatologists? The are bs alarmist scientists….. scaring the kids these days into thinking doom and gloom is coming 1
mspart Posted March 20 Posted March 20 3. Johan Rockström Director, Potsdam Institute “A 3 degree world is not livable.” This I believe. If this world were at 3 degrees ( I assume Kelvin), there would be no life anywhere. mspart
JimmySpeaks Posted March 21 Posted March 21 14 hours ago, red viking said: Zero scientists have said that. Another strawman and example of your constant dishonesty Zero? Speaking of lying LIVING the dream in the GREATEST COUNTRY on the planet!!!!
Jadon Dinwiddie Downers Grove South, Illinois Class of 2027 Committed to Wisconsin Parkside Projected Weight: 141
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now