DEI rocks

[ThreePointTakedown]

5 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Says the groomer supporter.  You’re worse than the kid that thinks they’re in the wrong body because you agree with them and then help them alter things.  You’re n the wrong side skippy.  Psychotherapy would help you. 
 

I’m stating facts and you wokesters don’t like facts.  Quotas are 110% prevalent in corporate America. 

Excellent example of conservative ‘facts’. 
Spout your conspiracy theories then claim as fact without any evidence. 
Got it. 

[ThreePointTakedown]

5 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You can try deny it all you want but every person in charge of hiring people is being graded on doing their part to hit that number.  If they dont hit those targets they will be held accountable.  I’ve seen it happen. 

‘I’m not going to provide the evidence that is, literally everywhere, but if you don’t believe me YOU are the delusional one’

Classic. 

[ThreePointTakedown]

4 hours ago, wrestlingguy said:

Is the fact that they have to create laws that require a certain percentage of hires to be minority hires(target recruitment) not enough to prove that the most qualified candidate isn't always the one hired?

Love the ‘just asking questions’ statement. 

Provide the law. 

When you won’t/can’t will you concede? 

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

‘I’m not going to provide the evidence that is, literally everywhere, but if you don’t believe me YOU are the delusional one’

Classic. 

Finally figured it out.  It’s been everywhere since the 70s.  

[ThreePointTakedown]

What they really mean when they are against Affirmative Action and/or DEI -

 

'What I don't like is how much harder it is for me and others that look like me to get a job or get into college, now that it's illegal to outwardly discriminate against women and minorities in the hiring and admissions processes.' 

 

or

 

'I want my life to be as easy as it was when minorities and women were systematically oppressed for my benefit.' 

[Scouts Honor]

25 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Excellent example of conservative ‘facts’. 
Spout your conspiracy theories then claim as fact without any evidence. 
Got it. 

says the guy who never has evidence just two page pink posts 

[Scouts Honor]

25 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

‘I’m not going to provide the evidence that is, literally everywhere, but if you don’t believe me YOU are the delusional one’

Classic. 

this is incredible coming from you.

you ignore evidence all around you constantly.

[JimmySpeaks]

30 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

‘I’m not going to provide the evidence that is, literally everywhere, but if you don’t believe me YOU are the delusional one’

Classic. 

Ok groomer. 

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

this is incredible coming from you.

you ignore evidence all around you constantly.

This  

[JimmySpeaks]

33 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Excellent example of conservative ‘facts’. 
Spout your conspiracy theories then claim as fact without any evidence. 
Got it. 

Mr pot/kettle speaks. 

[wrestlingguy]

34 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

What they really mean when they are against Affirmative Action and/or DEI -

 

'What I don't like is how much harder it is for me and others that look like me to get a job or get into college, now that it's illegal to outwardly discriminate against women and minorities in the hiring and admissions processes.' 

 

or

 

'I want my life to be as easy as it was when minorities and women were systematically oppressed for my benefit.' 

You aren't going to convince anyone that reverse discrimination is acceptable but go on. 

[ThreePointTakedown]

Scout

says the guy who never has evidence just two page pink posts 

Sorry that my pink pony club text gets your goat. Are there claims that I've made, that I didn't include a url as support, that you need? If you would ask, I would be happy to provide. I know that you are so keen to include evidence when I ask for it. I should have known better than to try to slip one past you without evidence. You are far too diligent to fall for something so diabolical. 

 

this is incredible coming from you.

you ignore evidence all around you constantly.

Seriously, do you believe that all people have your same experiences all the time? When you tell me to 'see the evidence around me' it feels like you're telling me to do YOUR HOMEWORK! That's not how it works. If you make a claim. Which you do all the time. If you really care that is correct or that you want to convince someone, INCLUDE EVIDENCE. 

Other than that you're dumb or lazy. You were convinced by stupid or inadequate evidence and are embarrassed to make public the stupid evidence that convinced you. Or you have such low standards for evidence that you think EVERYONE has the same low standards. Based on the 'the evidence is all around you' that you rely on so much. Its definitely the second one. 

Stop being so effing lazy! 

[ThreePointTakedown]

17 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

You aren't going to convince anyone that reverse discrimination is acceptable but go on. 

Says a privileged person, terrified of equality. 

[wrestlingguy]

11 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Says a privileged person, terrified of equality. 

You don't know me from a hole in the ground. You assuming everyone on this forum is privileged is comical. 

I don't buy your equality BS. You're the type of person that wouldn't be happy until everyone is living in grass huts.

Life isn't fair. I don't expect any billionaires to pay my way because the majority of them have earned it and taken risk that nobody else is willing to take.

[Offthemat]

“Alternatives to Affirmative Action

Concern for the less fortunate is entirely different from imagining that we can do what we cannot do. Nor is the humbling admission of our inherent limitations as human beings a reason for failing to do the considerable number of things which can still be done within those limitations. In America, at least, history has demonstrated dramatically that it can be done because it has already been done.

Americans need only look back to the beginning of the twentieth century to see what enormous social and economic progress has been made by some of the poorest and apparently least promising segments of the population. At the beginning of the twentieth century, only about half of the black population of the United States could read and write. Jews lived packed into slums on the lower east side of New York, with more overcrowding than in any slums in America today. As late as the First World War, the results of mass mental testing of American soldiers led a leading authority on mental tests to conclude that it was a myth that Jews were highly intelligent. The situation of Chinese Americans looked so hopeless that a popular expression of the time described someone facing impossible odds as having “not a Chinaman’s chance.”

Not even most optimists would have predicted at that time how much all these groups would rise over the next half century—before there were preferences or quotas. Even for blacks, at the center of current controversies about affirmative action, the decline in their poverty and their rise in the professions were both more dramatic before the federal government created affirmative action in the 1970s. With all these American ethnic groups—and others—what happened was not a transfer of benefits from the rest of the population, but a rising contribution from these minorities to the growing prosperity of American society as a whole, from which both they and the larger society benefited, as the less educated became more educated, as farm laborers and domestic servants acquired the skills and experience to take on more challenging work. This was not a zero-sum process, while redistribution is at best a zero-sum process, if it somehow manages to avoid disincentive effects and intergroup turmoil.

Why is this social process, with a proven track record, so little appreciated, or even noticed—and sometimes dismissed as a policy of “doing nothing”? Perhaps that is because, whatever its economic and social benefits, it offers few rewards to politicians, activists, and intellectuals or to those who wish to seem morally superior by denouncing society. The heroes of these groups’ rise are anonymous individuals, not public figures. Here is some history worth repeating—but only if the goal is the advancement of the less fortunate, rather than the aggrandizement of those who would be their guardians or spokesmen or elected officials.“
 

https://www.hoover.org/research/affirmative-action-around-world

[JimmySpeaks]

Minorities have it better in America than anywhere on the planet. Most don’t want help from DEI.   It’s the white wokster bleeding heart liberals that push it so they can feel morally right.  The reality is anyone in this country has the opportunity to make whatever they want to out of themselves.  Self accountability and self respect is all it takes.   Cue the “youre privileged” libtards to come play “the card”. 

[Scouts Honor]

hey pony boy

get a clue.

you dont' have to experience it.

we post it for you constantly.

homework done.

you just can't read.

or its just willful blindness.

i suspect both.

[Offthemat]

1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

 

“Alternatives to Affirmative Action

Concern for the less fortunate is entirely different from imagining that we can do what we cannot do. Nor is the humbling admission of our inherent limitations as human beings a reason for failing to do the considerable number of things which can still be done within those limitations. In America, at least, history has demonstrated dramatically that it can be done because it has already been done.

Americans need only look back to the beginning of the twentieth century to see what enormous social and economic progress has been made by some of the poorest and apparently least promising segments of the population. At the beginning of the twentieth century, only about half of the black population of the United States could read and write. Jews lived packed into slums on the lower east side of New York, with more overcrowding than in any slums in America today. As late as the First World War, the results of mass mental testing of American soldiers led a leading authority on mental tests to conclude that it was a myth that Jews were highly intelligent. The situation of Chinese Americans looked so hopeless that a popular expression of the time described someone facing impossible odds as having “not a Chinaman’s chance.”

Not even most optimists would have predicted at that time how much all these groups would rise over the next half century—before there were preferences or quotas. Even for blacks, at the center of current controversies about affirmative action, the decline in their poverty and their rise in the professions were both more dramatic before the federal government created affirmative action in the 1970s. With all these American ethnic groups—and others—what happened was not a transfer of benefits from the rest of the population, but a rising contribution from these minorities to the growing prosperity of American society as a whole, from which both they and the larger society benefited, as the less educated became more educated, as farm laborers and domestic servants acquired the skills and experience to take on more challenging work. This was not a zero-sum process, while redistribution is at best a zero-sum process, if it somehow manages to avoid disincentive effects and intergroup turmoil.

Why is this social process, with a proven track record, so little appreciated, or even noticed—and sometimes dismissed as a policy of “doing nothing”? Perhaps that is because, whatever its economic and social benefits, it offers few rewards to politicians, activists, and intellectuals or to those who wish to seem morally superior by denouncing society. The heroes of these groups’ rise are anonymous individuals, not public figures. Here is some history worth repeating—but only if the goal is the advancement of the less fortunate, rather than the aggrandizement of those who would be their guardians or spokesmen or elected officials.“
 

https://www.hoover.org/research/affirmative-action-around-world

@Doublehalf and @ThreePointTakedown   Read a book.

[Lipdrag]

Explicit numbers from an official corporate publication.  Which 110% does not exist, of course, despite there being a Headquarters location that accepts mail.

 

[JimmySpeaks]

4 hours ago, Lipdrag said:

Explicit numbers from an official corporate publication.  Which 110% does not exist, of course, despite there being a Headquarters location that accepts mail.

 

Stop with the facts.  Wokesters don’t know what to do with them.  

[Scouts Honor]

 

[JimmySpeaks]

The wokester libtards need to learn what a quota actually is. 

[Bigbrog]

19 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

What they really mean when they are against Affirmative Action and/or DEI -

 

'What I don't like is how much harder it is for me and others that look like me to get a job or get into college, now that it's illegal to outwardly discriminate against women and minorities in the hiring and admissions processes.' 

 

or

 

'I want my life to be as easy as it was when minorities and women were systematically oppressed for my benefit.' 

There he/she/they goes again, diagnosing and telling people what they feel and think without knowing them from a hole in the wall.  How does one learn to do that?  Did you read about it in a book?  Did a "professor" tell you how to do that?  Mommy and Daddy?  Or maybe just Mommy?

[Caveira]

On 2/19/2026 at 7:12 PM, red viking said:

Like I said, these quotas are almost completely non existent. Another bs winger scare tactic. 

 

[Lipdrag]

15 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

The University of Toronto does not exist even though it does have an address and a leader and other aspects of existence that  'Tifa does not.  Yet, because no DEI explicit hiring rules exist we can be 110% sure this university is only an imaginary one.